Wen D, et al. Characteristics of publicly available skin cancer image datasets: a systematic review. The Lancet Digital Health. 2022;4(1):e64-74.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Torrelo A. Atopic dermatitis in different skin types. What is to know?. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28:2–4.

Yang Y, et al. Enhancing fairness in face detection in computer vision systems by demographic bias mitigation. In: Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM conference on AI, ethics, and society. 2022. pp. 813–22.

Laurikkala J. Improving identification of difficult small classes by balancing class distribution. In: Artificial intelligence in medicine: 8th conference on artificial intelligence in medicine in Europe, AIME 2001 Cascais, Portugal, July 1–4, 2001, proceedings 8. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2001. pp. 63–6.

Poolsawad N, Kambhampati C, Cleland J. Balancing class for performance of classification with a clinical dataset. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering. 2014. vol. 1, pp. 1–6.

Kostick-Quenet KM, et al. Mitigating racial bias in machine learning. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2022;50(1):92–100.

Article  Google Scholar 

Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366(6464):447–53.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Norori N, et al. Addressing bias in big data and AI for health care: a call for open science. Patterns. 2021;2(10).

Fuchs DJ. The dangers of human-like bias in machine-learning algorithms. Missouri S&T’s Peer to Peer. 2018;2(1):1.

Google Scholar 

Jordan P. Why an AI-judged beauty contest picked nearly all white winners. Motherboard. 2016. Available from: https://www.vice.com/en/article/78k7de/why-an-ai-judged-beauty-contest-picked-nearly-all-white-winners.

Khalil A, Ahmed SG, Khattak AM, Al-Qirim N. Investigating bias in facial analysis systems: A systematic review. IEEE Access. 2020;8:130751–61.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wilson B, Hoffman J, Morgenstern J. Predictive inequity in object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.11097. 2019.

Lu B, Chen JC, Castillo CD, Chellappa R. An experimental evaluation of covariates effects on unconstrained face verification. IEEE Transactions on Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science. 2019;1(1):42–55.

Article  Google Scholar 

Howard A, Borenstein J. The ugly truth about ourselves and our robot creations: the problem of bias and social inequity. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24:1521–36.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kamulegeya L, et al. Using artificial intelligence on dermatology conditions in Uganda: A case for diversity in training data sets for machine learning. Afr Health Sci. 2023;23(2):753–63.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pipek LZ, et al. Comparison of SpO2 and heart rate values on Apple Watch and conventional commercial oximeters devices in patients with lung disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):18901.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Myers West S. Discriminating systems: gender, race, and power in artificial intelligence. 2020.

Diepgen TL, Mahler V. The epidemiology of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146(s61):1–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gloster HM Jr, Neal K. Skin cancer in skin of color. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(5):741–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hudson K, Lifton R, Patrick-Lake B, Burchard EG, Coles T, Collins R, Conrad A. The precision medicine initiative cohort program—Building a research foundation for 21st century medicine. Precision Medicine Initiative (PMI) Working Group Report to the Advisory Committee to the Director, ed. 2015.

Betancourt JR, Tan-McGrory A, Flores E, López D. Racial and ethnic disparities in radiology: a call to action. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(4):547–53.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

FitzGerald C, Hurst S. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 2017;18(1):1–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Crutchley M. Book Review: Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. London, England: SAGE Publications Sage UK; 2021.

Book  Google Scholar 

Kraehe AM, Herman D Jr. Racial encounters, ruptures, and reckonings: Art curriculum futurity in the wake of Black Lives Matter. Art Education. 2020;73(5):4–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Marcus G, Davis E. Rebooting AI: building artificial intelligence we can trust. Vintage. 2019.

Groh M, Harris C, Soenksen L, Lau F, Han R, Kim A, Koochek A, Badri O. Evaluating deep neural networks trained on clinical images in dermatology with the fitzpatrick 17k dataset. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2021. pp. 1820–28.

Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sunreactive skin types I through VI. Arehives of Dermatology. 1997;124:868.

Google Scholar 

Buolamwini J, Gebru T. Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. PMLR. 2018. pp. 77–91.

Karkkainen K, Joo J. Fairface: face attribute dataset for balanced race, gender, and age for bias measurement and mitigation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision 2021. 2021. pp. 1548–58.

McDuff D, Cheng R, Kapoor A. Identifying bias in AI using simulation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.00471. 2018.

Xu H, Sarkar A, Abbott AL. Color invariant skin segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2022. pp. 2906–15.

Monk EP Jr. Skin tone stratification among Black Americans, 2001–2003. Soc Forces. 2014;92(4):1313–37.

Article  Google Scholar 

Porgali B, Albiero V, Ryda J, Ferrer CC, Hazirbas C. The casual conversations v2 dataset. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2023. pp. 10–17.

Daneshjou R, et al. Skincon: A skin disease dataset densely annotated by domain experts for fine-grained debugging and analysis. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2022;35:18157–67.

Google Scholar 

Daneshjou R, et al. Disparities in dermatology AI performance on a diverse, curated clinical image set. Sci Adv. 2022;8(31):eabq6147.

Pacheco AG, et al. PAD-UFES-20: A skin lesion dataset composed of patient data and clinical images collected from smartphones. Data Brief. 2020;32: 106221.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Daneshjou R, et al. Lack of transparency and potential bias in artificial intelligence data sets and algorithms: a scoping review. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(11):1362–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chang CC et al. Robust skin type classification using convolutional neural networks. In: 2018 13th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA). IEEE; 2018. pp. 2011–4.

Musselwhite LW, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in cervical cancer screening and outcomes. Acta Cytol. 2016;60(6):518–26.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Williams DR, Cooper LA. Reducing racial inequities in health: using what we already know to take action. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(4):606.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yu L, Chen H, Dou Q, Qin J, Heng PA. Automated melanoma recognition in dermoscopy images via very deep residual networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;36(4):994–1004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg. 2021;88: 105906.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

TPH Mendonça. PH 2-A dermoscopic image database for research and benchmarking. In: 2013, 35th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE; 2013. pp. 5437–40.

Saez A, Serrano C, Acha B. Model-based classification methods of global patterns in dermoscopic images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014;33(5):1137–47.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sun X, Yang J, Sun M, Wang K. A benchmark for automatic visual classification of clinical skin disease images. In: Computer vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, proceedings, part VI 14 2016. Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 206–22.

Liao H, Li Y, Luo J. Skin disease classification versus skin lesion characterization: Achieving robust diagnosis using multi-label deep neural networks. In: 2016 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR). IEEE; 2016. pp. 355–60.

Kawahara J, BenTaieb A, Hamarneh G. Deep features to classify skin lesions. In: 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). 2016. IEEE. pp. 1397–1400.

Ge Z et al. Exploiting local and generic features for accurate skin lesions classification using clinical and dermoscopy imaging. In: 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017). IEEE; 2017. pp. 986–90.

Lopez AR, Giro-i-Nieto X, Burdick J, Marques O. Skin lesion classification from dermoscopic images using deep learning techniques. In: 2017 13th IASTED International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (BioMed). IEEE; 2017. pp. 49–54.

Kawahara J, Daneshvar S, Argenziano G, Hamarneh G. Seven-point checklist and skin lesion classification using multitask multimodal neural nets. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018;23(2):538–46.

Article  Google Scholar 

Han SS, Park GH, Lim W, Kim MS, Na JI, Park I, Chang SE. Deep neural networks show an equivalent and often superior performance to dermatologists in onychomycosis diagnosis: Automatic construction of onychomycosis datasets by region-based convolutional deep neural network. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1): e0191493.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gutman D et al. Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection: a challenge at the international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI) 2016, hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC). arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.01397. 2016.

Han SS, Kim MS, Lim W, Park GH, Park I, Chang SE. Classification of the clinical images for benign and malignant cutaneous tumors using a deep learning algorithm. J Investig Dermatol. 2018;138(7):1529–38.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shoieb DA, Youssef SM, An enhanced hybrid model for skin diagnosis using deep convolution neural network. In,. 9th Cairo International Biomedical Engineering Conference (CIBEC). IEEE. 2018;2018:37–40.

Google Scholar 

Goyal M, Yap MH, Hassanpour S, Yap MH. Region of interest detection in dermoscopic images for natural data-augmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.10711. 2018.

Mendes DB, da Silva NC. Skin lesions classification using convolutional neural networks in clinical images. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.02316. 2018.

Gonzalez-Diaz I. Dermaknet: Incorporating the knowledge of dermatologists to convolutional neural networks for skin lesion diagnosis. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018;23(2):547–59.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang J, Wu X, Liang J, Sun X, Cheng MM, Rosin PL, Wang L. Self-paced balance learning for clinical skin disease recognition. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. 2019;31(8):2832–46.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brinker TJ, et al. Deep learning outperformed 136 of 157 dermatologists in a head-to-head dermoscopic melanoma image classification task. Eur J Cancer. 2019;113:47–54.

Article  PubMed