Ellingson BM, Salamon N, Holly LT (2015) Advances in MR imaging for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 24(2):197–208

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karadimas SK, Gatzounis G, Fehlings MG (2015) Pathobiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J 24(2):132–138

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martin AR, Aleksanderek I, Cohen-Adad J et al (2016) Translating state-of-the-art spinal cord MRI techniques to clinical use: a systematic review of clinical studies utilizing DTI, MT, MWF, MRS, and fMRI. NeuroImage Clin 10:192–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.11.019

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alshareef M, Krishna V, Ferdous J et al (2014) Effect of spinal cord compression on local vascular blood flow and perfusion capacity. PLoS ONE 9(9):e108820

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ozawa H, Sato T, Hyodo H et al (2009) Clinical significance of intramedullary Gd-DTPA enhancement in cervical myelopathy. Spin Cord 48(5):415–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.152

Article  Google Scholar 

Uemura K, Matsumura A, Isobe T et al (2006) Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurol Med Chir 46(12):581–588

Article  Google Scholar 

Romano A, Rossi Espagnet MC, Calabria LF, Coppola V, Figà Talamanca L, Cipriani V, Minniti G, Pierallini A, Fantozzi LM, Bozzao A (2012) Clinical applications of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted MR imaging in brain tumours. Radiol Med (Torino) 117(3):445–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-011-0715-4

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Law M, Young R, Babb J et al (2006) Comparing Perfusion Metrics obtained from a single compartment versus pharmacokinetic modeling methods using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(9):1975–1982

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang S, Martinez-Lage M, Sakai Y et al (2016) Differentiating tumor progression from pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastomas using diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Am J Neuroradiol 37(1):28–36. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4474

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang S, Kim S, Chawla S et al (2011) Differentiation between glioblastomas, solitary brain metastases, and primary cerebral lymphomas using diffusion tensor and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 32(3):507–514

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Viallon M, Cuvinciuc V, Delattre B et al (2015) State-of-the-art MRI techniques in neuroradiology: principles, pitfalls, and clinical applications. Neuroradiology 57(5):441–467

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smith AM, Grandin CB, Duprez T et al (2000) Whole brain quantitative CBF, CBV, and MTT measurements using MRI bolus tracking: Implementation and application to data acquired from hyperacute stroke patients. J Magn Reson Imaging Jmri 12(3):400

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Leener B, Levy S, Dupont SM et al (2017) SCT: spinal cord toolbox, an open-source software for processing spinal cord MRI data. Neuroimage 145:24–43

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang C, Han X, Ma X, Jiang W, Wang J, Li S, Guo H, Tian W, Chen H (2024) Spinal cord perfusion is associated with microstructural damage in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty. Eur Radiol 34(2):1349–1357

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bouyagoub S (2024) A glimpse into the future: perfusion and diffusion MRI techniques for the assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Radiol 34(2):1346–1348

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wolford LM, Wardrop RW, Hartog JM (1987) Coralline porous hydroxylapatite as a bone graft substitute in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45(12):1034–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(87)90160-1

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chien A, Lai D-M, Cheng C-H, Wang S-F, Hsu W-L, Wang J-L (2014) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of a Chinese version of the Japanese orthopaedic association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire. Spine 39(12):963–970. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000313

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K et al (2001) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese orthopaedic association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 26(17):1890–1894

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chinchure S, Thomas B, Wangju S et al (2011) Mean intensity curve on dynamic contrast enhanced susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging—review of a new parameter to differentiate intracranial tumors. J Neuroradiol 38(4):199–206

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McCormick JR, Sama AJ, Schiller NC et al (2020) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a guide to diagnosis and management. Spine J 33(2):303–313

Google Scholar 

Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Riew KD, Middleton JW, Wang JC (2017) A clinical practice guideline for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy: introduction, rationale, and scope. Glob Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217703088

Article  Google Scholar 

Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Riew KD et al (2017) A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: recommendations for patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease and nonmyelopathic patients with evidence of cord compression. Glob Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217701914

Article  Google Scholar 

Donnally CJ 3rd, Patel PD, Canseco JA, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK (2022) Current management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Spine Surg 35(1):E68–E76

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen X, Shan T, Li Y (2022) Prognostic effect of increased postoperative MRI T2WI high signal intensity in degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine J 22(12):1964–1973

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tetreault LA, Dettori JR, Wilson JR et al (2013) Systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging characteristics that affect treatment decision making and predict clinical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 38:S89–S110. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7eae0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nam TH, Lee JW, Yeom JS et al (2021) Increased signal intensity on postoperative T2-weighted axial images in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of changes and associated impact on outcomes. J Clin Neurosci 90:244–250

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ozawa H, Aizawa T, Tateda S, Hashimoto K, Kanno H, Ishizuka M (2018) Spinal cord swelling after surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: relationship with intramedullary Gd-DTPA enhancement on MRI. Clin Spine Surg 31(7):E363–E367

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wei L, Cao P, Xu C et al (2018) comparison of the prognostic value of different quantitative measurements of increased signal Intensity on T2-weighted MRI in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. W Neurosurg 118:e505–e512

Article  Google Scholar 

Ellingson BM, Woodworth DC, Leu K, Salamon N, Holly LT (2019) Spinal cord perfusion mr imaging implicates both ischemia and hypoxia in the pathogenesis of cervical spondylosis. W Neurosurg 128:e773–e781

Article  Google Scholar 

Yang Y, Yang Y, Wu X et al (2020) Adding DSC PWI and DWI to BT-RADS can help identify postoperative recurrence in patients with high-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol 146(2):363–371

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smith AM, Grandin CB, Duprez T, Mataigne F, Cosnard G (2000) Whole brain quantitative CBF, CBV, and MTT measurements using MRI bolus tracking: implementation and application to data acquired from hyperacute stroke patients. J Magn Reson Imaging 12(3):400–410

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kurokawa R, Murata H, Ogino M, Ueki K, Kim P (2011) Altered blood flow distribution in the rat spinal cord under chronic compression. Spine 36(13):1006–1009. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eaf33d

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dewey BE, Xu X, Knutsson L et al (2021) MTT and blood-brain barrier disruption within asymptomatic vascular WM lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 42(8):1396–1402

Article