Blumenthal S, Courtois EC, Griffin CW et al (2023) Incidence of implant removal or revision surgery after cervical total disc replacement in a consecutive series of 1,615 patients beginning with the first case experience in 2003. Spine J 23(9):S141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2023.06.295

Article  Google Scholar 

Blumenthal SL, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Zigler JE (2013) Re-operations in Cervical Total Disc Replacement Compared with Anterior Cervical Fusion: Results Compiled from Multiple Prospective FDA IDE Trials Conducted at a Single Site. Spine 38(14):1177–1182

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wellington IJ, Kia C, Coskun E et al (2022) Cervical and Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Implant Design and Outcomes. Bioengineering (Basel) 9(5):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9050227

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hacker FM, Babcock RM, Hacker RJ (2013) Very Late Complications of Cervical Arthroplasty: Results of 2 Controlled Randomized Prospective Studies From a Single Investigator Site. Spine 38(26):2223–2226

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shin JJ, Kim KR, Son DW et al (2022) Radiological Changes in Adjacent and Index Levels after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty. Yonsei Med J 63(1):72–81. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2022.63.1.72

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Virk S, Phillips F, Khan S, Qureshi S (2021) A cross-sectional analysis of 1347 complications for cervical disc replacements from medical device reports maintained by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Spine J 21(2):265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2020.09.005

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scott-Young M, Rathbone E, Grierson L (2022) Midterm osteolysis-induced aseptic failure of the M6-C™ cervical total disc replacement secondary to polyethylene wear debris. Eur Spine J 31(5):1273–1282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07094-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tumialan LM, Gluf WM (2011) Progressive vertebral body osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine 36(14):E973–E978

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Parish JM, Asher AM, Coric D (2020) Complications and Complication Avoidance With Cervical Total Disc Replacement. Int J Spine Surg 14(s2):S50–S56. https://doi.org/10.14444/7091

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Guidance Document for the Preparation of IDEs for Spinal Systems (2000) Docket Number: FDA-2020-D-0957. Issued by: Center for Devices and Radiological Health on Janurary 13, 2000

Alves ÓL (2021) Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Expanded Indications. Neurosurg Clin N Am 32(4):437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2021.05.002

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pandey PK, Pawar I, Gupta J, Verma RR (2017) Comparison of Outcomes of Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion and Single-Level Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement for Single-Level Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease. Spine 42(1):E41–E49. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001696

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Davis RJ, Nunley PD, Kim KD et al (2015) Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg Spine 22(1):15–25

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Witiw CD, Smieliauskas F, Ham SA, Traynelis VC (2020) Cervical disc replacement: examining “real-world” utilization of an emerging technology. J Neurosurg Spine 32:689–695. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.10.Spine19919

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jackson RJ, Bae HW, Davis RJ, Hisey MS, Kim KD, Nunley PD (2014) Subsequent Surgery Rates after Treatment with TDR or ACDF at One or Two Levels: Results from an IDE Clinical Trial with Five Years Follow-Up. The Spine Journal 14(11):S22–S23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.08.063

Article  Google Scholar 

Salari B, McAfee PC (2012) Cervical total disk replacement: complications and avoidance. Orthop Clin North Am 43(1):97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2011.08.006

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Onken J, Reinke A, Radke J et al (2017) Revision surgery for cervical artificial disc: Surgical technique and clinical results. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 152:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.10.021

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blumenthal SL, Griffin C, Courtois EC et al (2024) Removals and Revisions of Cervical Total Disc Replacement Devices in a Consecutive Series of 1,626 Patients Beginning with the First Case Experience in 2003. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000005039

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steib JP, Dufour T, Beaurain J, Bernard P, Observational HJ (2023) Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with Mobi-C® in the Treatment of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease Results at 10 Years Follow-up. Spine 48(7):452–459. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000004536

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park JB, Chang H, Yeom JS, Suk KS, Lee DH, Lee JC (2016) Revision surgeries following artificial disc replacement of cervical spine. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 50(6):610–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.04.004

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Clark NJ, Francois EL, Freedman BA, Currier B (2020) Early Implant Failure of a 2-Level M6-Cervical Total Disc Replacement: A Case Report. JBJS Case Connect Jul-Sep 10(3):e1900644. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.Cc.19.00644

Article  Google Scholar 

Urgent Product Defect Correction; And Implant Hazard Alert (Australian Government Department of Health Therapeutic Goods Administration) (2020) RC-2020-RN-00478-1. Sponsor: Life Healthcare Pty Ltd. https://www.tga.gov.au

Wahbeh JM, Park SH, Campbell P, Ebramzadeh E, Sangiorgio SN (2022) The lexicon for periprosthetic bone loss versus osteolysis after cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 31(4):830–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07092-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Häckel S, Gaff J, Pabbruwe M et al (2024) Heterotopic ossification, osteolysis and implant failure following cervical total disc replacement with the M6-C™ artificial disc. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08129-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deng Y, Wang B, Hong Y et al (2023) Anterior bone loss: A common phenomenon which should be considered as bone remodeling process existed not only in patients underwent cervical disk replacement but also those with anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J 32(3):977–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07504-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thaler M, Hartmann S, Gstottner M, Lechner R, Gabl M, Bach C (2013) Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J 22(4):759–765

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen C, Zhang X, Ma X (2017) Durability of cervical disc arthroplasties and its influence factors: A systematic review and a network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(6):e5947. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000005947

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zigler JE, Guyer RD, Blumenthal SL, Ohnmeiss DD (2020) Analysis of re-operations after cervical total disc replacement in a consecutive series of 535 patients receiving the ProDisc-C device. Eur Spine J 29(11):2683–2687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06399-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guyer RD, Coric D, Nunley PD, Ohnmeiss DD (2022) Cervical Total Disk Replacement: Available Implant Size Matters. Clin Spine Surg 35(4):166–169. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000001314

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Satin AM, Rogers-LaVanne MP, Derman PB (2023) Cervical Disk Arthroplasty and Range of Motion at 7 Years: Impact on Adjacent Level Degeneration. Clin Spine Surg 36(3):83–89. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000001446

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pettine K (2011) Clinical Significance of Hypermobility in Cervical Artificial Disc Replacements. Spine J 11(10):S106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2011.08.264

Article  Google Scholar 

Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Phillips FM et al (2024) Prosthesis Design and Likelihood of Achieving Physiological Range of Motion After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Analysis of ROM data from 1,173 patients from 7 IDE clinical trials. Spine J 24(6):969–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.01.015

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kerferd JW, Abi-Hanna D, Phan K, Rao P, Mobbs RJ (2017) Focal hypermobility observed in cervical arthroplasty with Mobi-C. J Spine Surg 3(4):693–696. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2017.08.19

Article