Ban, H., H. Yamamoto, T. Hanakawa, S. Urayama, T. Aso, H. Fukuyama, and Y. Ejima. 2013. Topographic representation of an occluded object and the effects of spatiotemporal context in human early visual areas. Journal of Neuroscience 33: 16992–17007.

Article  Google Scholar 

Briscoe, R. E. 2018. Superimposed mental imagery: on the uses of make-perceive. In Perceptual imagination and perceptual memory, eds. F. Macpherson, and F. Dorsch. 161–185. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar 

Burge, T. 2018. Iconic representation: maps, pictures and perception. In The map and the territory, eds. S. Wuppuluri, and A. Doria. 79–100. Springer International Publishing.

Camp, E. 2007. Thinking with maps. Philosophical Perspectives 21: 145–182.

Article  Google Scholar 

Clarke, S. 2022. Mapping the visual icon. The Philosophical Quarterly 72: 552–577.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cooper, L. A. 1990. Mental representation of three-dimensional objects in visual problem solving and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 16: 1097–1106.

Google Scholar 

Corballis, P. M., R. Fendrich, R. M. Shapley, and M. S. Gazzaniga. 1999. Illusory contour perception and amodal boundary completion: evidence of a dissociation following callosotomy. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11: 459–466.

Article  Google Scholar 

de Haas, B., and D. S. Schwarzkopf. 2018. Spatially selective responses to Kanizsa and occlusion stimuli in human visual cortex. Scientific Reports 8: 611.

Article  Google Scholar 

de Wit, T. C. J., M. Bauer, R. Oostenveld, P. Fries and R. van Lier. 2006. Cortical responses to contextual influences in amodal completion. Neuroimage 32: 1815–1825.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dunn, F., and I. Parberry. 2011. 3D math primer for graphics and game development. New York: A K Peters/CRC.

Book  Google Scholar 

Gerbino, W., and D. Salmaso. 1987. The effect of amodal completion on visual matching. Acta Psychologica 65: 25–46.

Article  Google Scholar 

Green, E. J. 2019. On the perception of structure. Noûs 53: 564–592.

Article  Google Scholar 

Guan, C., and C. Firestone. 2020. Seeing what’s possible: disconnected visual parts are confused for their potential wholes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 149: 590–598.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hafri, A., and C. Firestone. 2021. The perception of relations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25: 475–492.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hazenberg, S. J., and R. van Lier. 2016. Disentangling effects of structure and knowledge in perceiving partly occluded shapes: an ERP study. Vision Research 126: 109–119.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hazenberg, S. J., M. L. Jongsma, A. Koning, and R. van Lier. 2013. Differential familiarity effects in amodal completion: support from behavioral and electrophysiological measurements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40: 669–684.

Google Scholar 

Hiew, S., J. Roothans, H. Eldebakey, J. Volkmann, D. Zeller, and M. M. Reich. 2023. Imagining the spin: disentangling the core processes underlying mental rotation by network mapping of data from meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 150.

Isaac, A. 2013. Objective similarity and mental representation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91: 683–704.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kellman, P. J., and T. F. Shipley. 1991. A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology 23: 141–221.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim, J., K. Jang, and B. L. Anderson. 2014. Amodal completion is modulated by lightness similarity. Attention Perception and Psychophysics 76: 98–111.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kind, A. 2018. Imaginative presence. In Phenomenal Presence, eds. F. Dorsch, and F. Macpherson. 165–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar 

Lande, K. J. 2020. Mental structures. Noûs 55: 649–677.

Lande., K. J. 2023a. Contours of vision: towards a compositional semantics of perception. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1086/725094.

Lande, K. J. 2023b. Seeing and visual reference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 106: 402–433.

Article  Google Scholar 

Marr, D. 1982. Vision. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

Google Scholar 

Marr, D., and H. K. Nishihara. 1978. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 200, 269–294.

Metzler, J., and R. N. Shepard. 1974. Transformational studies of the internal representation of three-dimensional objects. In Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium, ed. R. L. Solso, 147–201. Potomac, Maryland: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Morales, J., A. Bax, and C. Firestone. 2020. Sustained representation of perspectival shape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117: 14873–14882.

Morgan, A. T., L. S. Petro, and L. Muckli. 2019. Scene representations conveyed by cortical feedback to early visual cortex can be described by line drawings. The Journal of Neuroscience 39: 9410–9423.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nanay, B. 2010. Perception and imagination: amodal perception as mental imagery. Philosophical Studies 150: 239–254.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nanay, B. 2018. The importance of amodal completion in everyday practice. I-Perception 9: 1–16.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nanay, B. 2023. Mental imagery: philosophy, psychology, neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Book  Google Scholar 

Paulun, V. C., F. Schmidt, J. J. R. van Assen, and R. W. Fleming. 2017. Shape, motion, and optical cues to stiffness of elastic objects. Journal of Vision 17: 1–22.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pinker, S. 1980. Mental imagery and the third dimension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 109: 354–371.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pinker, S., and R. A. Finke. 1980. Emergent two-dimensional patterns in images rotated in depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6: 244–264.

Google Scholar 

Qiu, F., and von der Heydt, R. 2005. Figure and ground in the visual cortex: V2 combines stereoscopic cues with gestalt rules. Neuron 47: 155–166.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rauschenberger, R., and S. Yantis. 2001. Masking unveils pre-amodal completion representation in visual search. Nature 410: 369–372.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rauschenberger, R., T. Liu, S. D. Slotnick, and S. Yantis. 2006. Temporally unfolding neural representation of pictorial occlusion. Psychological Science 17: 358–364.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rescorla, Michael. 2009. Cognitive maps and the language of thought. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 377–407.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rock, I., D. Wheeler, and L. Tudor. 1989. Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints? Cognitive Psychology 91: 185–210.

Article  Google Scholar 

Schmidt, F., F. Phillips, and R. W. Fleming. 2019. Visual perception of shape-transforming processes: ‘shape scission’. Cognition 189: 167–180.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sekuler, A. B., and S. E. Palmer. 1992. Perception of partly occluded objects: a microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121: 95–111.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shepard, R. N. 1975. Form, formation, and transformation of internal representations. In Information processing and cognition, ed. R. L. Solso. 87–122. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

Google Scholar 

Shepard, R. N., and S. Chipman. 1970. Second-order isomorphism of internal representations: shapes of states. Cognitive Psychology 1: 1–17.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shepard, R. N., and C. Feng. 1972. A chronometric study of mental paper folding. Cognitive Psychology 3: 228–243.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shepard, R. N., and S. A. Judd. 1976. Perceptual illusion of rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 191: 952–954.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shepard, R. N., and J. Metzler. 1971. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171: 701–703.

Article  Google Scholar 

Spröte, P., and R. W. Fleming. 2016. Bent out of shape: the visual inference of non-rigid shape transformations applied to objects. Vision Research 126: 330–336.

Article  Google Scholar 

Thielen, J., S. E. Bosch, Tessa M. van Leeuwen, M. A. J. van Gerven, and R. van Lier. 2019. Neuroimaging findings on a modal completion: a review. i–Perception 10: 1–25.

Article  Google Scholar 

van Lier, R., and J. Wagemans. 1999. From images to objects: global and local completions of self-occluded parts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25: 1721–1741.

Google Scholar 

van Lier, R. J., P. A. van der Helm, and E. L. J. Leeuwenberg. 1995. Competing global and local completions in visual occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21: 571–583.

Google Scholar 

Vrins, S., T. C. J. De Wit, and R. Van Lier. 2009. Bricks, butter, and slices of cucumber: investigating semantic influences in amodal completion. Perception 38: 17–29.

Article  Google Scholar 

Weigelt, S., W. Singer, and L. Muckli. 2007. Separate cortical stages in amodal completion revealed by functional magnetic resonance adaptation. BMC Neuroscience 8: 70.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yamane, Y., E. T. Carlson, K. C. Bowman, Z. Wang, and C. E. Connor. 2008. A neural code for three-dimensional object shape in macaque inferotemporal cortex. Nature Neuroscience 11: 1352–1360.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yun, X., S. J. Hazenberg, and R. van Lier. 2018a. Temporal properties of amodal completion: influences of knowledge. Vision Research 145: 21–30.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yun, X., S. J. Hazenberg, and R. van Lier. 2018b. Investigation local and global effects of surface colours and contours in amodal completion. Visual Cognition 26: 608–623.