The Best Exercise Modality and Dose to Reduce Glycosylated Hemoglobin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review with Pairwise, Network, and Dose–Response Meta-Analyses

Marx N, Federici M, Schütt K, Müller-Wieland D, Ajjan RA, Antunes MJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. Eur Heart J. 2023;44:4043–140.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, Pinkepank M, Ogurtsova K, Duncan BB, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183: 109119.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McCowen KC, Smith RJ. Diabetes mellitus: classification and chemical pathology. In: Caballero B, editor. Encyclopedia of human nutrition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2005. p. 543–51.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Selvin E, Marinopoulos S, Berkenblit G, Rami T, Brancati FL, Powe NR, et al. Meta-analysis: glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(6):421–31.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kilpatrick ES, Bloomgarden ZT, Zimmet PZ. Is haemoglobin A1c a step forward for diagnosing diabetes? BMJ. 2009;339: b4432.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yu HJ, Ho M, Liu X, Yang J, Chau PH, Fong DYT. Incidence and temporal trends in type 2 diabetes by weight status: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Global Health. 2023;13:04088.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shan Z, Li Y, Zong G, Guo Y, Li J, Manson JE, et al. Rotating night shift work and adherence to unhealthy lifestyle in predicting risk of type 2 diabetes: results from two large US cohorts of female nurses. BMJ. 2018;363: k4641.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Honda T, Kishimoto H, Mukai N, Hata J, Yoshida D, Hirakawa Y, et al. Objectively measured sedentary time and diabetes mellitus in a general Japanese population: the Hisayama study. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10(3):809–16.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patterson R, McNamara E, Tainio M, de Sá TH, Smith AD, Sharp SJ, et al. Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(9):811–29.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Garcia-Hermoso A, López-Gil JF, Ramírez-Vélez R, Alonso-Martínez AM, Izquierdo M, Ezzatvar Y. Adherence to aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 million participants across 3.2 countries. Br J Sports Med. 2023;57(4):225–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pan B, Ge L, Xun YQ, Chen YJ, Gao CY, Han X, et al. Exercise training modalities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2018;15(1):72.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hou L, Wang Q, Pan B, Li R, Li Y, He J, et al. Exercise modalities for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2023;39(1): e3591.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jayedi A, Emadi A, Shab-Bidar S. Dose-dependent effect of supervised aerobic exercise on HbA(1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sports Med. 2022;52(8):1919–38.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higgins J. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2023. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current. Accessed 7 Jun 2024.

WHO guidelines approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

Google Scholar 

Kamper SJ, Yamato TP, Williams CM. The prevalence, risk factors, prognosis and treatment for back pain in children and adolescents: an overview of systematic reviews. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016;30(6):1021–36.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR Jr, Tudor-Locke C, et al. 2011 Compendium of physical activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1575–81.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades AE, White IR. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):98–110.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2019;366: l4898.

Google Scholar 

Salanti G, Del Giovane C, Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Higgins JP. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7): e99682.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lin L, Chu H, Murad MH, Hong C, Qu Z, Cole SR, et al. Empirical comparison of publication bias tests in meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(8):1260–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–101.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Efthimiou O, Debray TP, van Valkenhoef G, Trelle S, Panayidou K, Moons KG, et al. GetReal in network meta-analysis: a review of the methodology. Res Synth Methods. 2016;7(3):236–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Owen RK, Bradbury N, Xin Y, Cooper N, Sutton A. MetaInsight: an interactive web-based tool for analyzing, interrogating, and visualizing network meta-analyses using R-shiny and netmeta. Res Synth Methods. 2019;10(4):569–81.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mavridis D, Salanti G. A practical introduction to multivariate meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2013;22(2):133–58.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Valkenhoef G, Lu G, de Brock B, Hillege H, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Automating network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(4):285–99.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, Cooper N, Abrams KR, Ades A. Evidence synthesis for decision making in healthcare. Alexandria, VA: Wiley; 2012.

Book  Google Scholar 

Brooks SP, Gelman A. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J Comput Graph Stat. 1998;7(4):434–55.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, Caldwell DM, Lu G, Ades AE. Evidence synthesis for decision making 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(5):641–56.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163–71.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mawdsley D, Bennetts M, Dias S, Boucher M, Welton NJ. Model-based network meta-analysis: a framework for evidence synthesis of clinical trial data. CPT Pharmacometric Syst Pharmacol. 2016;5(8):393–401.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Wheeler DC, Hickson DA, Waller LA. Assessing local model adequacy in Bayesian hierarchical models using the partitioned deviance information criterion. Comput Sata Data Anal. 2010;54(6):1657–71.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ter Veer E, van Oijen MGH, van Laarhoven HWM. The use of (network) meta-analysis in clinical oncology. Front Oncol. 2019;9:822.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pedder H, Dias S, Bennetts M, Boucher M, Welton NJ. Modelling time-course relationships with multiple treatments: model-based network meta-analysis for continuous summary outcomes. Res Synth Methods. 2019;10(2):267–86.

Article 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif