Difrisco J, Love AC, Wagner GP, Wetenschappelijk F, John O. The hierarchical basis of serial homology and evolutionary novelty. J Morphol. 2023;284:e21531.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hall BK, Kerney R. Levels of biological organization and the origin of novelty. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2012;318:428–37.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pigliucci M. What, if anything, is an evolutionary novelty? Philos Sci. 2008;75:887–98.

Article  Google Scholar 

Casewell NR, Wüster W, Vonk FJ, Harrison RA, Fry BG. Complex cocktails: the evolutionary novelty of venoms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013;28:219–29.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

DiFrisco J, Wagner GP, Love AC. Reframing research on evolutionary novelty and co-option: character identity mechanisms versus deep homology. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2023;145:3–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wagner GP. Evolutionary innovations and novelties: let us get down to business! Zoologischer Anzeiger. 2015;256:75–81.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wagner GP. Homology, genes, and evolutionary innovation. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2014.

Schendel V, Rash LD, Jenner RA, Undheim EAB. The diversity of venom: the importance of behavior and venom system morphology in understanding its ecology and evolution. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11:666.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fusco G. Serial homology. Biol Theory. 2022;17:114–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Edgecombe GD, Giribet G. Evolutionary biology of centipedes (Myriapoda: Chilopoda). Annu Rev Entomol. 2007;52:151–70.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Edgecombe GD. Arthropod phylogeny: an overview from the perspectives of morphology, molecular data and the fossil record. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2010;39:74–87.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fernández R, Edgecombe GD, Giribet G. Exploring phylogenetic relationships within Myriapoda and the effects of matrix composition and occupancy on phylogenomic reconstruction. Syst Biol. 2016;65:871–89.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Haug JT, Haug C, Schweigert G, Sombke A. The evolution of centipede venom claws - open questions and possible answers. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2014;43:5–16.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Undheim EAB, Fry BG, King GF. Centipede venom: recent discoveries and current state of knowledge. Toxins (Basel). 2015;7:679–704.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosenberg J, Hilken G. Fine structural organization of the poison gland of Lithobius forficatus (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha). Nor J Entomol. 2006;53:119–27.

Google Scholar 

Antoniazzi MM, Pedroso CM, Knysak I, Martins R, Guizze SPG, Jared C, et al. Comparative morphological study of the venom glands of the centipede Cryptops iheringi, Otostigmus pradoi and Scolopendra viridicornis. Toxicon. 2009;53:367–74.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dass CMS, Jangi BS. Ultrastructural organization of the poison gland of the centipede Scolopendra morsitans Linn. Indian J Exp Biol. 1978;16:748–57.

Google Scholar 

Dugon MM, Arthur W. Comparative studies on the structure and development of the venom-delivery system of centipedes, and a hypothesis on the origin of this evolutionary novelty. Evol Dev. 2012;14:128–37.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ménez A, Zimmerman K, Zimmerman S, Heatwole H. Venom apparatus and toxicity of the centipede Ethmostigmus rubripes (Chilopoda, Scolopendridae). J Morphol. 1990;206:303–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dugon MM, Hayden L, Black A, Arthur W. Development of the venom ducts in the centipede Scolopendra: an example of recapitulation. Evol Dev. 2012;14:515–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kenning M, Müller CHG, Sombke A. The ultimate legs of Chilopoda (Myriapoda): a review on their morphological disparity and functional variability. PeerJ. 2017;5:e4023.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kenning M, Schendel V, Müller CHG, Sombke A. Comparative morphology of ultimate and walking legs in the centipede Lithobius forficatus (Myriapoda) with functional implications. Zool Lett. 2019;5:3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sombke A, Müller CHG. When SEM becomes a deceptive tool of analysis: the unexpected discovery of epidermal glands with stalked ducts on the ultimate legs of geophilomorph centipedes. Front Zool. 2021;18:17.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Blower G. Epidermal glands in centipedes. Nature. 1952;170:166–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Edgecombe GD, Giribet G. Adding mitochondrial sequence data (16S rRNA and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I) to the phylogeny of centipedes (Myriapoda: Chilopoda): an analysis of morphology and four molecular loci. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 2004;42:89–134.

Article  Google Scholar 

Keil T. Die Antennensinnes- und Hautdrüsenorgane von Lithobius forficatus L. Berlin: Freie Univesität Berlin; 1975.

Lewis JGE, Yeung PCS. The appearance and disappearance of telopodal glands during the development of Lithobius microps (Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae). Bull Bri Myr Grp. 1995;11:59–62.

Google Scholar 

Verhoeff KW. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Steinläufer, Lithobiiden. In: Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie und Biologie der Tiere. München; 1905. p. 124–58.

Verhoeff KW. Abteilung Gliederfüssler: Arthropoda Klasse Chilopoda. In: Bronn’s Klassen und Ordnungen des Tier-Reichs. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft; 1902. p. 725.

Simon HR. Zum Abwehrverhalten von Lithobius forficatus (Myriapoda, Chilopoda). Entomol Z. 1964;74:114–8.

Google Scholar 

Panic J. Das Verhalten von Ameisen gegenüber bodenbewohnenden Kleinarthropoden. Pedobiologia (Jena). 1963;2:223–34.

Article  Google Scholar 

Müller CHG, Rosenberg J, Hilken G. Ultrastructure, functional morphology and evolution of recto-canal epidermal glands in Myriapoda. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2014;43:43–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Farkaš R. Apocrine secretion: new insights into an old phenomenon. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2015;1850:1740–50.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sosinka A, Rost-Roszkowska MM, Vilimova J, Tajovský K, Kszuk-Jendrysik M, Chajec T, et al. The ultrastructure of the midgut epithelium in millipedes (Myriapoda, Diplopoda). Arthropod Struct Dev. 2014;43:477–92.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chajec Ł, Sonakowska L, Rost-Roszkowska MM. The fine structure of the midgut epithelium in a centipede, Scolopendra cingulata (Chilopoda, Scolopendridae), with the special emphasis on epithelial regeneration. Arthropod Struct Dev. 2014;43:27–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rost-Roszkowska MM, Kszuk-Jendrysik M, Marchewka A, Poprawa I. Fine structure of the midgut epithelium in the millipede Telodeinopus aoutii (Myriapoda, Diplopoda) with special emphasis on epithelial regeneration. Protoplasma. 2018;255:43–55.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jenner RA, von Reumont BM, Campbell LI, Undheim EAB. Parallel evolution of complex centipede venoms revealed by comparative proteotranscriptomic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 2019;36:2748–63. Data set. Centipede venom evolution. Natural History Museum; 2019. https://doi.org/10.5519/0025128 .

Undheim EAB, Jones A, Clauser KR, Holland JW, Pineda SS, King GF, et al. Clawing through evolution: toxin diversification and convergence in the ancient lineage Chilopoda (centipedes). Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31:2124–48.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Smith CF, Nikolakis ZL, Ivey K, Perry BW, Schield DR, Balchan NR, et al. Snakes on a plain: biotic and abiotic factors determine venom compositional variation in a wide-ranging generalist rattlesnake. BMC Biol. 2023;21:1–19.

Article  Google Scholar 

Strickland JL, Smith CF, Mason AJ, Schield DR, Borja M, Castañeda-Gaytán G, et al. Evidence for divergent patterns of local selection driving venom variation in Mojave Rattlesnakes (Crotalus scutulatus). Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–15.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Casewell NR, Jackson TNW, Laustsen AH, Sunagar K. Causes and consequences of snake venom variation. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2020;41:570–81.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Walker AA,