Hattie J. Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London and New York: Routledge; 2009.

Google Scholar 

Vygotsky LS. Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.

Google Scholar 

Shute V. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2008;2008(78):153–89.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77:81–112.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wood D, Bruner JS, Ross G. Role of tutoring in problem-solving. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013;17:89–100.

Article  Google Scholar 

van den Bergh L, Ros A, Beijaard D. Teacher feedback during active learning: Current practices in primary schools. Br J Educ Psychol. 2013;83(Pt 2):341–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02073.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kelly E, Richards JB. Medical education: Giving feedback to doctors in training. BMJ. 2019;366:l4523. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4523.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ramani S, Krackov SK. Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment. Med Teach. 2012;34(10):787–91. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.684916.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bangeranye C, Lim YS. How to use cognitively diagnostic assessments of student performance as a method for monitoring and managing the instructional quality in undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 2020;95(1):145–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002954.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rupp AA, Templin JL, Henson RA. Diagnostic measurement. Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Guilford; 2010.

de la Torre J, van der Ark A, Rossi G. Analysis of clinical data from a cognitive diagnosis modeling framework. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2018;51(4):281–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1327286.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sessoms J, Henson RA. Applications of diagnostic classification models: a literature review and critical commentary. Measure: Interdisc Res Perspect. 2018;16(1):1–17.

Lim YS, Drasgow F. Nonparametric calibration of item by attribute matrix in cognitive diagnosis. Multivar Behav Res. 2017;52:562–75.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen Y, Culpepper SA, Chen Y, Douglas J. Bayesian estimation of DINA Q matrix. Psychometrika. 2018;83:89–108.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tatsuoka KK. A probabilistic model for diagnosing misconception in the pattern classification approach. J Educ Behav Stat. 1985;12:55–73.

Article  Google Scholar 

Junker BW, Sijtsma K. Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Appl Psychol Meas. 2001;25:258–72.

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu R, Huggins-Manley AC, Bulut O. Retrofitting diagnostic classification models to responses from IRT-based assessment forms. Educ Psychol Measur. 2018;78(3):357–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416685599.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen J, de la Torre J, Zhang Z. Relative and absolute fit evaluation in cognitive diagnosis modeling. J Educ Meas. 2013;50(2):123–40.

Article  Google Scholar 

Robitzsch A, Kiefer T, George AC, Uenlue A. CDM: cognitive diagnosis modeling [R package]. Version 7.5-15. 2020. https://cran.r-project.org/package=CDM. Accessed 1 Mar 2021.

Ma W, de la Torre J. GDINA: the generalized DINA model framework [R Package]. Version 2.7.9. 2020. https://cran.r-project.org/package=GDINA. Accessed 1 Mar 2021.