Vitorino RWS, Fornaziero CC, Fernandes EV. Evaluation of performance and perception of learning in teaching human anatomy: traditional method vs constructivist method. Int J Morphol. 2020;38:74–7. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022020000100074.

Article  Google Scholar 

Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat. 2016;208:151–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.02.010.

Article  Google Scholar 

Singal A. Transforming anatomy education: then and now. Anat Sci Int. 2022;97(2):230–1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-021-00645-4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Davis CR, Bates AS, Ellis H, Roberts AM. Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(4):262–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1424.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kurt E, Yurdakul SE, Ataç A. An overview of the technologies used for anatomy education in terms of medical history. Procedia - Social Behav Sci. 2013;103:109–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.314.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hamasaki MY, Mendes C, Neto JP. Body projection: an accessible tool for human anatomy teaching. Educ Health. 2021;34(1):37–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.EfH_52_20.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bhat GM, Bhat IH, Shahdad S, Rashid S, Khan MA, Patloo AA. Analysis of feasibility and acceptability of an e-learning module in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(2):376–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2096.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moro C, Phelps C. Smartphone-based augmented reality physiology and anatomy laboratories. Med Educ. 2022;56(5):575–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14756.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mustafa AG, et al. Teaching Musculoskeletal Module using dissection videos: feedback from medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):604. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03036-5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nakai K, Terada S, Takahara A, Hage D, Tubbs RS, Iwanaga J. Anatomy education for medical students in a virtual reality workspace: a pilot study. Clin Anat. 2022;35(1):40–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23783.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fornaziero CC, Gil CRR. New technologies applied to the teaching of human anatomy. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2003;27(2):141–6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v27.2-009.

Article  Google Scholar 

Clarsen B, Steffen K, Berge HM, Bendiksen F, Fossan B, Fredriksen H, Gjelsvik H, Haugvad L, Kjelsberg M, Ronsen O, Torgalsen T, Walløe A, Bahr R. Methods, challenges and benefits of a health monitoring programme for Norwegian olympic and paralympic athletes: the road from London 2012 to Tokyo 2020. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(23):1342–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-103717.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tong Y, Ye L. Sports health monitoring management system based on artificial intelligence algorithm. Front Phys. 2023;11:1141944. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1141944.

Article  Google Scholar 

Alsaid B. Slide shows vs graphic tablet live drawing for anatomy teaching. Morphologie. 2016;100(331):210–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2016.05.003.

Article  Google Scholar 

Folger D, Merenmies J, Sjöberg L, Pyörälä E. Hurdles for adopting mobile learning devices at the outset of clinical courses. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):594. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03008-9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Do DH, Lakhal S, Bernier M, Bisson J, Bergeron L, St-Onge C. Drivers of iPad use by undergraduate medical students: the technology acceptance model perspective. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03152-w.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bolatli G, Kizil H. The Effect of Mobile learning on student success and anxiety in teaching genital system anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(1):155–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2059.

Article  Google Scholar 

Demir BT, Eşme S, Patat D, Bilecenoğlu B. The effect of mobile applied anatomy learning on students’ academic success, cognitive loads, and attitudes. Med Sci Educ. 2023;33(3):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01787-y.

Article  Google Scholar 

Walsh K. Mobile learning in medical education: review. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2015;25(4):363–6. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v25i4.10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Naseem A, Nizamuddin S, Ghias K. The outcomes of a mobile just-in-time-learning intervention for teaching bioethics in Pakistan. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):674. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03698-9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Taş F, Bolatlı G. A new model in medicine education: smart model education set. Surg Radiol Anat. 2022;44(8):1201–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-02989-6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Krogager ME, Fugleholm K, Mathiesen TI, Spiriev T. Simplified easy-accessible smartphone-based photogrammetry for 3-dimensional anatomy presentation exemplified with a photorealistic cadaver-based model of the intracranial and extracranial course of the facial nerve. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2023;25(2):e71–7. https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000000748.

Article  Google Scholar 

Traser CJ, Hoffman LA, Seifert MF, Wilson AB. Investigating the use of quick response codes in the gross anatomy laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 2015 Sep-Oct;8(5):421–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1499.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mogali SR, et al. Scan and learn: quick response code enabled museum for mobile learning of anatomy and pathology. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(6):664–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1848.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dias NB, de Souza MFE, Krueger E, Fornaziero CC, Fernandes EV. The use of quick response code in teaching musculoskeletal anatomy. Arq Ciênc Saúde Unipar. 2020;24(2):113–6. https://www.revistas.unipar.br/index.php/saude/article/view/7646.

Google Scholar 

Yang MY, Tseng HC, Liu CH, Tsai SY, Chen JH, Chu YH, Li ST, Lee JJ, Liao WC. Effects of the individual three-dimensional printed craniofacial bones with a quick response code on the skull spatial knowledge of undergraduate medical students. Anat Sci Educ 2023 Sep-Oct;16(5):858–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2269.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gurses ME, Gonzalez-Romo NI, Xu Y, Mignucci-Jiménez G, Hanalioglu S, Chang JE, Rafka H, Vaughan KA, Ellegala DB, Lawton MT, Preul MC. Interactive microsurgical anatomy education using photogrammetry 3D models and an augmented reality cube. J Neurosurg 2024 Jan 26:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.10.JNS23516.

Article  Google Scholar 

Karia CT, Hughes A, Carr S. Uses of quick response codes in healthcare education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):456. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1876-4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Küçük S, Kapakin S, Göktaş Y. Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(5):411–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1603.

Article  Google Scholar 

Duarte ML, et al. Learning anatomy by virtual reality and augmented reality. A scope review. Morphologie. 2020;104(347):254–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2020.08.004.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moro C, Birt J, Stromberga Z, Phelps C, Clark J, Glasziou P, Scott AM. Virtual and augmented reality enhancements to medical and science student physiology and anatomy test performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(3):368–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2049.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stepan K, Zeiger J, Hanchuk S, Del Signore A, Shrivastava R, Govindaraj S, Iloreta A. Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7(10):1006–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.21986.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brown KE, et al. A Large-Scale, Multiplayer virtual reality Deployment: a novel approach to distance education in human anatomy. Med Sci Educ. 2023;33(2):409–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01751-w.

Article  Google Scholar 

Saab MM, Hegarty J, Murphy D, Landers M. Incorporating virtual reality in nurse education: a qualitative study of nursing students’ perspectives. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;105:105045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105045.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sutherland J, Belec J, Sheikh A, Chepelev L, Althobaity W, Chow BJW, Mitsouras D, Christensen A, Rybicki FJ, La Russa DJ. Applying modern virtual and augmented reality technologies to medical images and models. J Digit Imaging. 2019;32(1):38–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0122-7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Elsayed M, Kadom N, Ghobadi C, Strauss B, Al Dandan O, Aggarwal A, Anzai Y, Griffith B, Lazarow F, Straus CM, Safdar NM. Virtual and augmented reality: potential applications in radiology. Acta Radiol. 2020;61(9):1258–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185119897362.

Article  Google Scholar 

Izard SG, Juanes Méndez JA, Palomera PR. Virtual reality educational tool for human anatomy. J Med Syst. 2017;41(5):76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-017-0723-6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Erolin C, Reid L, McDougall S. Using virtual reality to complement and enhance anatomy education. J Vis Commun Med. 2019;42(3):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2019.1597626.

Article  Google Scholar 

Silver A. Five innovative ways to use 3D printing in the laboratory. Nature. 2019;565(7737):123–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-07853-5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Smith CF, Tollemache N, Covill D, Johnston M. Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(1):44–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1718.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cai B, Rajendran K, Bay BH, Lee J, Yen CC. The effects of a functional three-dimensional (3D) printed knee joint simulator in improving anatomical spatial knowledge. Anat Sci Educ. 2019;12(6):610–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1847.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ye Z, et al. The role of 3D printed models in the teaching of human anatomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):335. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02242-x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Garas M, Vaccarezza M, Newland G, McVay-Doornbusch K, Hasani J. 3D-Printed specimens as a valuable tool in anatomy education: a pilot study. Ann Anat. 2018;219:57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2018.05.006.

Article  Google Scholar 

Clifton W, Damon A, Soares C, Nottmeier E, Pichelmann M. Investigation of a three-dimensional printed dynamic cervical spine model for anatomy and physiology education. Clin Anat. 2021;34(1):30–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23607.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gadaleta DJ, Huang D, Rankin N, Hsue V, Sakkal M, Bovenzi C, Huntley CT, Willcox T, Pelosi S, Pugliese R, Ku B. 3D printed temporal bone as a tool for otologic surgery simulation. Am J Otolaryngol 2020 May-Jun;41(3):102273.