Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health. 2015;12:57.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Torloni MR, Gülmezoglu AM, Betran AP. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: A worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG. 2016;123(5):745–53.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sobhy S, Arroyo-Manzano D, Murugesu N, Karthikeyan G, Kumar V, Kaur I, et al. Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019;393(10184):1973–82.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Esteves-Pereira AP, Deneux-Tharaux C, Nakamura-Pereira M, Saucedo M, Bouvier-Colle MH, Do Carmo Leal M. Caesarean delivery and postpartum maternal mortality: A population-based case control study in Brazil. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153396.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

De Mucio B, Serruya S, Alemán A, Castellano G, Sosa CG. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cesarean delivery and other uterine surgery as risk factors for placenta accreta. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2019;147(3):281–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bjellmo S, Andersen GL, Hjelle S, Klungsøyr K, Krebs L, Lydersen S, et al. Does caesarean delivery in the first pregnancy increase the risk for adverse outcome in the second? A registry-based cohort study on first and second singleton births in Norway. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e037717.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349–57.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cardwell CR, Stene LC, Joner G, Cinek O, Svensson J, Goldacre MJ, et al. Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetologia. 2008;51(5):726–35.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang L, Chen Q, Zhao Y, Wang W, Fang F, Bao Y. Is elective cesarean section associated with a higher risk of asthma? A meta-analysis J Asthma. 2015;52(1):16–25.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barros FC, De Lyra Rabello Neto D, Villar J, Kennedy SH, Silveira MF, DIaz-Rossello JL, et al. Caesarean sections and the prevalence of preterm and early-term births in Brazil: Secondary analyses of national birth registration. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e021538.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Do Carmo Leal M, Esteves-Pereira AP, Nakamura-Pereira M, Torres JA, Theme-Filha M, Domingues RMSM, et al. Prevalence and risk factors related to preterm birth in Brazil. Reprod Health. 2016;

Leal MDC, Esteves-Pereira AP, Nakamura-Pereira M, Domingues RMSM, Dias MAB, Moreira ME, et al. Burden of early-term birth on adverse infant outcomes: A population-based cohort study in Brazil. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e017789.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brazil health M from. Information System on Live Births in Brazil. 2019. Available from: http://www2.datasus.gov.br/DATASUS/index.php?area=0205.

Souza JP, Betran AP, Dumont A, De Mucio B, Gibbs Pickens CM, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al. A global reference for caesarean section rates (C-Model): A multicountry cross-sectional study. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(3):427–36.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Djulbegovic B. A framework to bridge the gaps between evidence-based medicine, health outcomes, and improvement and implementation science. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(3):200–2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Torres JA, Leal M do C, Domingues RMSM, Esteves-Pereira Ana Paula, Andreza Rodrigues Nakano MLG, Figueiró AC, Marcos Nakamura-Pereira de O EFV, et al. Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):194.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

ANS. Parto Adequado [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.ans.gov.br/prestadores/parto-adequado.

The Breakthrough Series: IHI’s Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement | IHI - Institute for Healthcare Improvement. [cited 2022 Sep 13]. Available from: https://www.ihi.org/resources/pages/ihiwhitepapers/thebreakthroughseriesihiscollaborativemodelforachievingbreakthroughimprovement.aspx.

Borem P, de Cássia SR, Torres J, Delgado P, Petenate AJ, Peres D, et al. A Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase the Frequency of Vaginal Delivery in Brazilian Hospitals. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(2):415–25.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chaillet N, Dumont A. Evidence-based strategies for reducing cesarean section rates: A meta-analysis. Birth. 2007;34(1):53–64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Torres JA, Domingues RMSM, Sandall J, Hartz Z, da Gama SGN, Filha MMT, et al. Caesarean section and neonatal outcomes in private hospitals in Brazil: Comparative study of two different perinatal models of care. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30(Suppl 1):S1-12.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Borem P, Ferreira JBB, da Silva UJ, ValérioJúnior J, Orlanda CMB. Increasing the percentage of vaginal birth in the private sector in Brazil through the redesign of care model. Rev Bras Ginecol e Obs. 2015;37(10):446–54.

Article  Google Scholar 

MAIA, MB. Assistência à saúde e ao parto no Brasil. In: Humanização do parto: política pública, comportamento organizacional e ethos profissional [online]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FIOCRUZ; 2010, pp. 19–49.

Nagarajan R, Scutari M, Lèbre S. Bayesian Networks in R: with Applications in Systems Biology. Bayesian Networks in R: with Applications in Systems Biology. 2013.

Heckerman D, Geiger D, Chickering DM. Learning Bayesian Networks: The Combination of Knowledge and Statistical Data. Mach Learn. 1995;

Yeaton J, Sechrest L. Evaluating health care. Am Behav Sci. 1985;28(4):527–42.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brousselle A, Champagne F, Contandriopoulos A-P, Hartz Z. A análise de implantação. In: Avaliação: Conceitos e métodos. 2011. p. 291.

Nakamura-Pereira M, Do Carmo Leal M, Esteves-Pereira AP, Domingues RMSM, Torres JA, Dias MAB, et al. Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: The role of source of payment for childbirth. Reprod Health. 2016;13(Suppl 3):128.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Betrán AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni MR, et al. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. The Lancet. 2018.

World Health Organization W. Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience [Internet]. 2018. 212 p. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/260178/1/9789241550215-eng.pdf?ua=1%0Ahttp://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/intrapartum-care-guidelines/en/.

Vedam S, Stoll K, Taiwo TK, Rubashkin N, Cheyney M, Strauss N, et al. The Giving Voice to Mothers study: Inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States. Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 11 [cited 2022 Sep 13];16(1):1–18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2.

Attanasio LB, Hardeman RR. Declined care and discrimination during the childbirth hospitalization. Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul 1 [cited 2022 Sep 13];232:270–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31112918/.

Sudhinaraset M, Giessler K, Golub G, Afulani P. Providers and women’s perspectives on person-centered maternity care: A mixed methods study in Kenya. Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 10 [cited 2022 Sep 13];18(1):1–15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0980-8.

Afulani PA, Afulani PA, Buback L, Kelly AM, Kirumbi L, Cohen CR, et al. Providers’ perceptions of communication and women’s autonomy during childbirth: A mixed methods study in Kenya. Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 3 [cited 2022 Sep 13];17(1):1–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0909-0.

Olza I, Leahy-Warren P, Benyamini Y, Kazmierczak M, Karlsdottir SI, Spyridou A, et al. Women’s psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: a meta-synthesis. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2018 Oct 1 [cited 2022 Sep 13];8(10). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30341110/.

Passos HR, Machado M, Id F, Bozlak CT, Shaw BA, Rene I. Brazilian women ’ s use of evidence-based practices in childbirth after participating in the Senses of Birth intervention : A mixed- methods study. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(4):1–28.

Google Scholar 

Phadungkiatwattana P, Tongsakul N. Analyzing the impact of private service on the cesarean section rate in public hospital Thailand. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2011.

A. A. Health reform and cesarean sections in the private sector: The experience of Peru. Health Policy (New York). 2011;

Lutomski JE, Murphy M, Devane D, Meaney S, Greene RA. Private health care coverage and increased risk of obstetric intervention. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:13.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. The Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rebelo F, Da Rocha CMME, Cortes TR, Dutra CL, Kac G. High cesarean prevalence in a national population-based study in Brazil: The role of private practice. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(7):903–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taljaard M, Donner A, Villar J, Wojdyla D, Faundes A, Zavaleta N, et al. Understanding the factors associated with differences in caesarean section rates at hospital level: The case of Latin America. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009;23(6):574–81.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Soltani H, Sandall J. Organisation of maternity care and choices of mode of birth: A worldwide view. Midwifery. 2012;28(2):146–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hodnett ED, Downe S, Walsh D. Alternative versus conventional institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;2012(8):CD000012.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brocklehurst P, Hardy P, Hollowell J, Linsell L, Macfarlane A, McCourt C, et al. Perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: The Birthplace in England national prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012;343:d7400.

Google Scholar 

Jackson DJ, Lang JM, Swartz WH, Ganiats TG, Fullerton J, Ecker J, et al. Outcomes, Safety, and Resource Utilization in a Collaborative Care Birth Center Program Compared with Traditional Physician-Based Perinatal Care. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(6):999–1006.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;4(4):CD004667.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tracy SK, Hartz DL, Tracy MB, Allen J, Forti A, Hall B, et al. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9906):1723–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Negrini R, da Silva Ferreira RD, Guimarães DZ. Value-based care in obstetrics: comparison between vaginal birth and caesarean section. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Dec 1 [cited 2022 Sep 13];21(1):1–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03798-2.

Entringer AP, Pinto M, Gomes MA de SM. Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health. Rev Saude Publica. 2018;52:91.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Domingues RMSM, Luz P, Ayres BV, Torres J, Leal M do carmo. Cost effectiveness analysis of a quality improvement program to reduce cesarean sections in Brazilian private hospitals: a case study. ReprodHealth. 2021;18(1):93.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Leal MDC, Bittencourt SA, Esteves-Pereira AP, Ayres BVDS, Silva LBRAA, Thomaz EBAF, et al. Progress in childbirth care in Brazil: preliminary results of two evaluation studies [Avanços na assistência ao parto no Brasil: resultados preliminares de dois estudos avaliativos]. Cad Saude Publica. 2019;35(7):e00223018.

Article