Rights Are Necessary but Insufficient for the Achievement of the Full Inclusion of People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Abella, J. (2017). Poem analysis. https://poemanalysis.com/john-donne/holy-sonnet-17-xvii/. Accessed 15 June 2023

Arnardóttir, O. M., & Quinn, G. (2009). The UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: European and Scandinavian perspectives. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.789_3.x

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2012). Intellectual disability, Australia, 2012 (Cat. no. 4433.0.55.003). https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4433.0.55.003main+features45201. Accessed 12 June 2023

Australian Government. (2022). Royal Commission report on abuse, neglect and exploitation of people with disability. https://disability.royalcommission.gov.au/node/7457. Accessed 5 June 2023

Australian Productivity Commission. (2011). Disability care and support. Inquiry report. Inquiry report - Disability Care and Support - Productivity Commission (pc.gov.au))

Google Scholar 

Badetti, L. (2020). Toward an encounter model of disability: Jean Vanier’s work in communication with disability models and disability studies. Journal of Disability and Religion. https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2020.1718574

Beiser, F. C. (2011). Savigny and the historical school of law: The German historist tradition (pp. 214–252). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691555.003.0006

Book  Google Scholar 

Bickenbach, J. (2016). From manifesto to action. Transforming the aspiration of disability rights into accountable government action. In J. S. Gordon, J.-C. Poder, & H. Burckhart (Eds.), Human rights and disability: Interdisciplinary perceptions (pp. 111–113). Routledge.

Google Scholar 

Bill of Rights. (1689). https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bill-of-Rights-British-history. Accessed 13 June 2023

Bill of Rights in United States Constitution. (1791). https://www.britannica.com/topic/Bill-of-Rights-United-States-Constitution. Accessed 7 June 2023

Carlson, L. (2010). Philosophers of intellectual disability: a taxonomy. In E. F. Kittay & L. Carlson (Eds.), Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy (pp. 315–329). John Wiley Sons.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Centre of Research Excellence in Disability and Health (2021). Nature and extent of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation against people with disability in Australia. https://disability.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/nature-and-extent-violence-abuse-neglect-and-exploitation-against-people-disability-australia. Accessed 10 June 2023

Clapton, J. (2009). A transformatory ethic of inclusion. Rupturing concepts of disability and inclusion. Sense Publishers.

Book  Google Scholar 

Clapton, J. (2011). Inclusion: illusion or confusion. An applied ethics analysis of individualized funding. In H. S. Reinders (Ed.), Authenticity and community. Essays in honor of Herman Meininger (pp. 67–86). Garant.

Google Scholar 

Clifford Simplican, S. (2015). The capacity contract: intellectual disability and the question of citizenship. University of Minnesota Press.

Book  Google Scholar 

Cocks, R. (2004). Sir Henry Maine: a study in Victorian jurisprudence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558399

Book  Google Scholar 

Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. (1789). https://www.britannica.com/topic/Declaration-of-the-Rights-of-Man-and-of-the-Citizen. Accessed 7 June 2023

Degener, T. (2017). A new human rights model of disability. In V. Della Fina, R. Cera, & G. Palmisano (Eds.), The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary (pp. 41–59). Springer International Publishing.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Degener T, & Quinn G. (2002) A survey of international, comparative and regional disability law reform. In: S. Yee &, M.L. Breslin (eds) Disability rights law and policy: International and national perspectives (pp. 3-128). Transnational.

Di Rita, P. A., Parmenter, T. R., & Stanclife, R. J. (2008). Utility, economic rationalism and the circumscription of agency. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52(7), 618–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01069

Article  Google Scholar 

Didi, A., Soldatic, K., Frohmader, C., & Dowse, L. (2016). Violence against women with disabilities: is Australia meeting its human rights obligations? Australian Journal of Human Rights, 22(1), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323-238X.2016.11882162

Article  Google Scholar 

Dokecki, P. R. (1992). Ethics and mental retardation: steps toward the ethics of community. In L. Rowitz (Ed.), Mental retardation in the year 2000 (pp. 39–51). SpringerVerlag.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Edwards, S. D. (1997). The moral status of intellectually disabled individuals. Journal of Medical Philosophy, 22, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/22.1.29

Article  Google Scholar 

Escamilla, M. (2008). Rights and utilitarianism: John Stuart Mill’s role in its history. https://doi.org/10.4000/etudes-benthamiennes.192

Book  Google Scholar 

Francis, L. P., & Silvers, A. (2010). Thinking about the good: reconfiguring liberal metaphysics (or not) for people with cognitive disabilities. In E. F. Kittay & L. Carlson (Eds.), Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy (pp. 237–260). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444322781.ch14

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Gomez, L. E., Monsalve, A., Lucia Moran, M., Angeles Alcedo, M., Lombardi, M., & Schalock, R. L. (2020). Measurable indicators of CRPD for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities within the quality of life framework. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5123), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/jerph17145123

Article  Google Scholar 

Hammarberg, T. (2011). Disability rights: from charity to equality. European Human Rights Law Review, 6, 638–641.

Google Scholar 

Hammer, E. (Ed.). (2007). German Idealism. Contemporary Perspectives. Routledge.

Google Scholar 

Harris, S. P., Owen, R., Fisher, K. R., & Gould, R. (2014). Human rights and neoliberalism in Australian welfare to work policy: experiences and perceptions of people with disabilities and disability stakeholders. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v34i4.3992

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Blackwell.

Google Scholar 

Hillman, A., Donelly, M., Whitaker, L., & Parmenter, T. R. (2012). Experiencing rights within positive, person-centred support networks of people with intellectual disability in Australia. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(11), 1065–1075. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01647

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hughes, K., Bellis, M. A., Jones, L., Wood, S., Bates, G., Eckley, L., McCoy, E., Mikton, C., Shakespeare, T., & Officer, A. (2012). Prevalence and risk of violence against adults with disabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. The Lancet, 379(9826), 1621–1629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61851-5

Article  Google Scholar 

Kayess, R., & French, P. (2008). Out of darkness into light? Human Rights Law Review, 1, 1–24.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kittay, E. F. (2010). The personal is philosophical: a philosopher and mother of a cognitively disabled person sends notes from the battlefield. In E. F. Kittay & L. Carlson (Eds.), Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy (pp. 393–413). Wiley-Blackwell.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Kittay, E. F., & Carlston, L. (Eds.). (2010). Cognitive disability and its challenge to moral philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell.

Google Scholar 

Langford, M. (2018). Critiques of human rights. Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, 14, 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113807

Article  Google Scholar 

Lawson, A., & Beckett, A. (2021). The social and human rights models of disability: towards a complementarity thesis. The International Journal of Hum Rights, 25(2), 348–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987/2020.1783533

Article  Google Scholar 

Llewellyn, J & Thompson, S, (2020). Nationalism as a cause of World War I. Alpha History. http://alphahistory.com/worldwarI1/nationalism.

Lombardi, M., Vandenbussche, H., Claes, C., Schalock, R. L., De Maeyer, J., & Vandevelde, S. (2019). The concept of quality of life as framework for implementing the UNCRPD. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 16(3), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12279

Article  Google Scholar 

McCallum, R. (2020). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: An assessment of Australia’s level of compliance. Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities - An Assessment of Australia’s Level of Compliance | Royal Commission into Violence, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability.

Google Scholar 

McVilly, K. R., Stancliffe, R. J., Parmenter, T. R., & Burton-Smith, R. M. (2006). ‘I get by with a little help from my friends’: Adults with intellectual disability discuss loneliness. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 19, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2005.00261.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Mitchell, D., & Snyder, S. (2013). Minority model: from liberal to neoliberal futures of disability. In Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 42–50). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203144114-10

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Mitra, S. (2006). The capability approach and disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16(4), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073060160040501

Article  Google Scholar 

Mittler, P. (2015). The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: implementing a paradigm shift. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 12(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12118

Article  Google Scholar 

Mladenov, T. (2012a). The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and its interpretation. ALTER: European Journal of Disability Research, 7(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2012.08.010

Article  Google Scholar 

Mladenov, T. (2012b). Personal assistance for disabled people and the understanding of human being. Critical Social Policy, 32(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018311430454

Article  Google Scholar 

Mladenov, T. (2015). Neoliberalism, postsocialism, disability. Disability & Society, 30(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1021758

Article  Google Scholar 

Morán, L., Gómez, L. E., Verdugo, M. Á., & Schalock, R. L. (2023). The quality of life supports model as a vehicle for implementing rights. Behavioral Sciences, 13, 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050365

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Morris, J. (2004). Independent living and community care: a disempowering framework. Disability & Society, 19(5), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759042000235280

Article  Google Scholar 

Nickel, J. (2006). Making sense of human rights(2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Google Scholar 

Nirje, B. (1985). The basis and logic of the normalization principle. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disability, 11(2), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668258509008747

Article  Google Scholar 

Nussbaum, M. (2009). The capabilities of people with cognitive disabilities. Metaphilosophy, 40(3), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01606.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.

Book  Google Scholar 

O’Cinneide, C. (2009). Extracting protection for the rights of persons with disabilities from human rights frameworks: established limits and new possibilities. In O. M. Arnardóttir & G. Quinn (Eds.), The UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives (pp. 163–198). Martinus Nijhoff Publis.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Oliver, M. (2004). The social model in action: if I had a hammer. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research (pp. 18–31). The Disability Press.

Google Scholar 

Organization for Economic and Community Development (OECD). (2011). How’s life? OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264121164-en

Book  Google Scholar 

Parker Harris, S., Owen, R., Fisher, K. R., & Gould, R. (2014). Human rights and neoliberalism in Australian welfare to work policy: experiences and perceptions of people with disabilities and disability stakeholders. Disability Studies Quarterly, Archives, 34(4), 10.18061/dsq.v34i4.

Google Scholar 

Parmenter, T. R. (2001). Intellectual disabilities. Quo vadis? In G. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 267–296). Sage.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Parmenter, T. R. (2011). Promoting training and employment opportunities for people with intellectual disabilities: International experience. International Labour Organisation, Working Paper Number 103. ISBN: 9789221254973;9789221254980 (web pdf)[ISBN.

Google Scholar 

Parmenter, T. R. (2014). Inclusion and quality of life: Are we there yet? International Public Health Journal., 6(4), 413–428.

Google Scholar 

Quinones, J., & Lajka, A. (2017). "What kind of society do you want to live in?": inside the country where Down syndrome is disappearing. CBSN On Assignment. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/down-syndrome-iceland/. Accessed 10 June 2023

Reinders, H. S. (1999). The limits of the rights discourse. Paper presented at the roundtable of the special interest research group (SIRG) on ethics. International Association Scientific Study Intellectual Disabilities.

Google Scholar 

Reinders, H. S. (2000). The future of the disabled in liberal society. An ethical analysis. University of Notre Dame Press.

Google Scholar 

Reinders, H. S. (2008a). The transformation of human services. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52(7), 564–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01079.x

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif