Oweira H, Ramouz A, Ghamarnejad O, Khajeh E, Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh S, Nikbakhsh R, Reißfelder C, Rahbari N, Mehrabi A, Sadeghi M (2022) Risk factors of rejection in renal transplant recipients: a narrative review. J Clin Med 11(5):1392

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rocca, X., O. Espinoza, F. Hidalgo, and F. Gonzalez. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: safe and comfortable surgical alternative for living donors and for good results of graft function. In Transplantation proceedings. 2005. Elsevier.

Mehrabi, A., M. Wiesel, M. Zeier, A. Kashfi, P. Schemmer, T. Kraus, M.W. Büchler, and J. Schmidt, Results of renal transplantation using kidneys harvested from living donors at the University of Heidelberg. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2004. 19(suppl_4): p. iv48-iv54.

Rudow DL, Warburton KM (2016) Selection and postoperative care of the living donor. Medical Clinics 100(3):599–611

Google Scholar 

Xiao Q, Fu B, Song K, Chen S, Li J, Xiao J (2020) Comparison of Surgical Techniques in Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. Ann Transplant 25:e926677–e926681

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yuan, H., L. Liu, S. Zheng, L. Yang, C. Pu, Q. Wei, and P. Han. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis. in Transplantation Proceedings. 2013. Elsevier.

Wilson, C.H., A. Sanni, D.A. Rix, and N.A. Soomro, Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011(11).

Wang H, Chen R, Li T, Peng L (2019) Robot-assisted laparoscopic vs laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: A meta-analysis. Clin Transplant 33(1):e13451

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giacomoni A, Di Sandro S, Lauterio A, Concone G, Buscemi V, Rossetti O, De Carlis L (2016) Robotic nephrectomy for living donation: surgical technique and literature systematic review. The American Journal of Surgery 211(6):1135–1142

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dumlu EG, Kılınç İ, Parlak Ö, Özsoy M, Demirci B, Kilic M (2021) Effect of learning curve on the perioperative course of robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy compared with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Rev Assoc Med Bras 67:1033–1037

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lecoanet, P., M.F. Chammas Jr, W.N. Sime, F. Guillemin, G. Karam, M. Ladrière, P. Eschwège, A.I. Mitre, L. Frimat, and J. Hubert. Minimally Invasive and Open Donor Nephrectomy: Lessons Learned From a French Multicenter Experience. in Transplantation Proceedings. 2022. Elsevier.

Zeuschner P, Hennig L, Peters R, Saar M, Linxweiler J, Siemer S, Magheli A, Kramer J, Liefeldt L, Budde K (2020) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison of 250 cases. J Clin Med 9(6):1610

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Windisch, O.L., M. Matter, M. Pascual, P. Sun, D. Benamran, L. Bühler, and C.E. Iselin, Robotic versus hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: comparison of two minimally invasive techniques in kidney transplantation. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022: p. 1–11.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev 10(1):1–11

Article  Google Scholar 

Kalkum E, Klotz R, Seide S, Hüttner FJ, Kowalewski K-F, Nickel F, Khajeh E, Knebel P, Diener MK, Probst P (2021) Systematic reviews in surgery—recommendations from the Study Center of the German Society of Surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 406(6):1723–1731

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sterne, J.A., M.A. Hernán, B.C. Reeves, J. Savović, N.D. Berkman, M. Viswanathan, D. Henry, D.G. Altman, M.T. Ansari, and I. Boutron, ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. bmj, 2016. 355.

Fonouni H, Mehrabi A, Golriz M, Zeier M, Müller-Stich B, Schemmer P, Werner J (2014) Comparison of the laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy: an overview of surgical complications and outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399(5):543–551

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kulu Y, Fathi P, Golriz M, Khajeh E, Sabagh M, Ghamarnejad O, Mieth M, Ulrich A, Hackert T, Müller-Stich BP (2019) Impact of surgeon’s experience on vascular and haemorrhagic complications after kidney transplantation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 57(1):139–149

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Weitz J, Koch M, Mehrabi A, Schemmer P, Zeier M, Beimler J, Büchler M, Schmidt J (2006) Living-donor kidney transplantation: risks of the donor–benefits of the recipient. Clin Transplant 20:13–16

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Özdemir-van Brunschot, D.M., G.G. Koning, K.C. van Laarhoven, M. Ergün, S.B. van Horne, M.M. Rovers, and M.C. Warle, A comparison of technique modifications in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2015. 10(3): p. e0121131.

Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C, Borysiewicz CA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP, Papalois VE (2008) Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 247(1):58–70

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mamode N, Johnson RJ, Hadjianastassiou VG (2011) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy does not compromise outcomes for pediatric transplant recipients. Transplantation 91(9):1005–1009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Troppmann C, McBride MA, Baker TJ, Perez RV (2005) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A risk factor for delayed function and rejection in pediatric kidney recipients? A UNOS analysis. Am J Transplant 5(1):175–182

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mehrabi, A., M. Golriz, E. Khajeh, O. Ghamarnejad, Y. Kulu, M. Wiesel, T. Müller, A. Majlesara, C. Schmitt, and B. Tönshoff, Surgical outcomes after pediatric kidney transplantation at the University of Heidelberg. Journal of Pediatric Urology, 2019. 15(3): p. 221. e1–221. e8.

Kulu Y, Müller-Stich BP, Ghamarnejad O, Khajeh E, Polychronidis G, Golriz M, Nickel F, Benner L, Knebel P, Diener M (2018) Hand-Assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy PERiumbilical versus Pfannenstiel incision and return to normal physical ACTivity (HAPERPACT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 19(1):1–9

Article  Google Scholar 

Giacomoni A, Concone G, Di Sandro S, Lauterio A, De Carlis L (2014) The meaning of surgeon’s comfort in robotic surgery. Am J Surg 208(5):871–872

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Corrigan, N., H. Marshall, J. Croft, J. Copeland, D. Jayne, and J. Brown, Exploring and adjusting for potential learning effects in ROLARR: a randomised controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection. Trials, 2018. 19(1): p. 1–11.

Bhattu AS, Ganpule A, Sabnis RB, Murali V, Mishra S, Desai M (2015) Robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a prospective randomized comparative study. J Endourol 29(12):1334–1340

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang, A., N. Barman, E. Chin, D. Herron, A. Arvelakis, D. LaPointe Rudow, S.S. Florman, and M.A. Palese, Robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a retrospective comparison of perioperative course and postoperative outcome after 1 year. Journal of robotic surgery, 2018. 12(2): p. 343–350.

Horgan S, Vanuno D, Sileri P, Cicalese L, Benedetti E (2002) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Transplantation 73(9):1474–1479

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Geffner S, Klaassen Z, Tichauer M, Chamberlain RS, Paragi PR (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomies: early experience and review of the literature. J Robot Surg 5(2):115–120

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu XS, Narins HW, Maley WR, Frank AM, Lallas CD (2012) Robotic-assistance does not enhance standard laparoscopic technique for right-sided donor nephrectomy. Jsls 16(2):202–207

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Monn MF, Gramm AR, Bahler CD, Yang DY, Sundaram CP (2014) Economic and utilization analysis of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Endourol 28(7):780–783

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cohen AJ, Williams DS, Bohorquez H, Bruce DS, Carmody IC, Reichman T, Loss GE Jr (2015) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: decreasing length of stay. Ochsner J 15(1):19–24

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Janki, S., K.W.J. Klop, S.M. Hagen, T. Terkivatan, M.G.H. Betjes, T.C.K. Tran, and J.N.M. Ijzermans, Robotic surgery rapidly and successfully implemented in a high volume laparoscopic center on living kidney donation. Int J Med Robot, 2017. 13(2).

Luke, P.P., S. Aquil, B. Alharbi, H. Sharma, and A. Sener, First Canadian experience with robotic laparoendoscopic single-site vs. standard laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: A prospective comparative study. Can Urol Assoc J, 2018. 12(11): p. E440-e446.

Shin TY, Lee YS (2019) Robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: surgical feasibility and technique. Heliyon 5(8):e02204

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Achit H, Guillemin F, Karam G, Ladrière M, Baumann C, Frimat L, Hosseini K, Hubert J (2020) Cost-effectiveness of four living-donor nephrectomy techniques from a hospital perspective. Nephrol Dial Transplant 35(11):2004–2012

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Takagi K, Kimenai H, Terkivatan T, Tran KTC, Ijzermans JNM, Minnee RC (2021) Learning curves of minimally invasive donor nephrectomy in a high-volume center: A cohort study of 1895 consecutive living donors. Int J Surg 86:7–12

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thai MS, Chau QT, Hoang KC, Ngo XT, Tran TT, Nguyen TH, Thai KL, Vu DH, Dinh LQV, Pham DM, Tiong HY, Nguyen TT (2022) Introducing robot-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy after experience in retroperitoneal endoscopic approach: a matched propensity score analysis. ANZ J Surg 92(3):531–537

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar