Wang J, Hu K, Wang Y, Wu Y, Bao E, Wang J, Tan C, Tang T (2023) Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Robot Surg 17(6):2617–2631

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haney CM, Kowalewski KF, Westhoff N, Holze S, Checcuci E, Neuberger M, Haapiainen H, Egen L, Antti K, Porpiglia F, Stolzenburg JU (2023) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur Urol Focus 9(6):930–937

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bernardes MFVG, de Chagas SC, de Izidoro LCR, Veloso DFM, Chianca TCM, da Mata LRF (2019) Impact of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of individuals undergoing radical prostatectomy. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2757.3131

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, Strada E, Petralia G, Bramerio M, Ascione A, Gambacorta M, Bocciardi AM (2013) Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥1 year of follow-up. Eur Urol 64(6):974–980

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Covas Moschovas M, Bhat S, Onol FF, Rogers T, Roof S, Mazzone E, Mottrie A, Patel V (2020) Modified apical dissection and lateral prostatic fascia preservation improves early postoperative functional recovery in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a propensity score–matched analysis. Eur Urol 78(6):875–884

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arroyo C, Martini A, Wang J, Tewari AK (2019) Anatomical, surgical and technical factors influencing continence after radical prostatectomy. Ther Adv Urol 8(11):175628721881378

Article  Google Scholar 

Kang HE, Bin KS, Il NT, Shim JS, Kang SH, Cheon J, Tae JH, Patel VR, Kang SG (2022) Modified apical dissection improves early continence in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: comparative study between modified apical dissection and anterior suspension stitch. Investig Clin Urol 63(6):639

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A (2016) Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 5(1):210

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hróbjartsson A, Kirkham J, Jüni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schünemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 12:i4919

Article  Google Scholar 

The Cochrane Collaboration (2020) Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.4

Li H, Yang C, Liao Z, Wang K, Zhang Y, Cao R (2023) Modified anterior approach preserving Retzius space versus standard anterior approach robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a matched-pair analysis. Front Oncol 2:13

Google Scholar 

Shimmura H, Banno T, Nakamura K, Murayama A, Shigeta H, Sawano T, Kouchi Y, Ozaki A, Yamabe F, Iizuka J, Takagi T (2023) A single-center retrospective comparative analysis of urinary continence in robotic prostatectomy with a combination of umbilical ligament preservation and Hood technique. Int J Urol 30(10):889–895

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kucuk EV, Sobay R, Tahra A (2023) Ultrapreservation in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy provides early continence recovery. JSLS : J Soc Laparosc Robot Surg 27(1):e2022.00077

Article  Google Scholar 

Wagaskar VG, Mittal A, Sobotka S, Ratnani P, Lantz A, Falagario UG, Martini A, Dovey Z, Treacy PJ, Pathak P, Nair S, Roy B, Chakravarty D, Lewis S, Haines K, Wiklund P, Tewari A (2021) Hood technique for robotic radical prostatectomy—preserving periurethral anatomical structures in the space of Retzius and sparing the pouch of douglas, enabling early return of continence without compromising surgical margin rates. Eur Urol 80(2):213–221

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang H, Ning Z, Jia G, Zhang G, Wang J, Liu H, Tao B, Wang C (2023) Modified hood technique for single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy contributes to early recovery of continence. Front Surg 3:10

CAS  Google Scholar 

de Carvalho PA, Barbosa JABA, Guglielmetti GB, Cordeiro MD, Rocco B, Nahas WC, Patel V, Coelho RF (2020) Retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle with preservation of dorsal venous complex during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: optimizing functional outcomes. Eur Urol 77(5):628–635

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT (2021) Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods 12(1):55–61

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barakat B, Othman H, Gauger U, Wolff I, Hadaschik B, Rehme C (2022) Retzius sparing radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which technique is more beneficial for prostate cancer patients (MASTER study)? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 8(4):1060–1071

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosenberg JE, Jung JH, Edgerton Z, Lee H, Lee S, Bakker CJ, Dahm P (2020) Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013641.pub2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar