Relationship between serial serum neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients

Kidney and Blood Pressure Research

Abstract

Background It is believed that the excessive cardiovascular (CV) burden of patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) is closely associated with chronic inflammation. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inflammatory marker that was shown to correlate with CV outcomes. However, little is known about the significance of serial monitoring of serum NLR. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of serial NLR on all-cause mortality and CV mortality in PD patients. Methods Serial measurement of NLR was obtained from 225 incident PD patients in a single center, with each measurement one year apart. Patients were divided into two groups (‘high’ versus ‘low’) by the median value of NLR. The primary and secondary outcome measure was all-cause and CV mortality respectively. Results After a median of follow up for 43.9 months, patients with lower baseline NLR demonstrated a higher survival rate (p=0.01). Patients with persistently high NLR values on serial measurement had the lowest survival rate (p=0.03). Multivariate Cox regression showed that this group of patients had significantly higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.74, 95%CI 1.09 to 2.79, p=0.02). However, the NLR failed to demonstrate a statistically significant relationship with CV mortality. Conclusions While baseline NLR was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in PD patients, persistent elevation in NLR appeared to further amplify the risk. Regular monitoring of serial serum NLR may enable early identification of patients who are at risk of adverse outcome.

The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif