Nongynecologic Cytopathology
Shield P. · Ribu D.L.Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price. Rent via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article Organize, annotate and mark up articles Printing and downloading restrictions apply Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more Select* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication Details AbstractIntroduction Metastatic melanoma (MM) is an uncommon finding in serous effusion specimens with a highly variable cytomorphology. Methods We reviewed specimens submitted over a 19-year period to determine (a) the range of cytologic findings in effusion specimens from melanoma patients and b) the cytologic presentation and immunoprofile of MM in effusion specimens. Results Of 123 serous effusion specimens from patients with clinical notes of melanoma, 59% were reported negative for malignancy; 16% were reported with a non-melanoma malignancy; 19% MM; and 6% atypical, MM not excluded. Pleural fluids were twice as likely to be reported as MM than peritoneal samples. Review of 44 cases with confirmed MM showed the most common cytologic pattern was epithelioid. Most (88%) cases contained mainly dispersed plasmacytoid cells, but many (61%) also contained malignant cells arranged in loose groups. Rare cases also had spindle cells, giant bizarre cells, small lymphoid-like cells or cells with large hard-edged vacuoles, mimicking other metastatic malignancies. MM cases containing predominantly plasmacytoid cells often mimicked reactive mesothelial cells. As well as being composed of cells of similar size, features such as bi- and multi-nucleation, round nuclei, mild anisokaryosis, nucleoli and loose groups were common to both. Features seen more commonly in MM than reactive cells included large nucleoli (95%) and intranuclear cytoplasmic inclusions (41%), binucleate ‘bug-eyed demons’, and small punctate vacuoles on the air-dried preparations. Pigment was identified in 36% of cases. IHC is a valuable aid in confirming the cell type. The sensitivity for the most commonly used melanoma markers was: S100 84% (21/25); pan-Melanoma 100% (19/19); HMB45 92% (11/12); Melan A 92% (11/12); SOX10 91% (10/11). No staining was reported for Calretinin (0/21); AE1/AE3 (0/11); EMA (0/16); Ber-Ep4 (0/13). Discussion: Effusion specimens from patients with a history of melanoma are frequently (40%) malignant, but almost as likely to be reported as a non-melanoma malignancy as MM. The cytology of MM may mimic a wide range of other metastatic malignancies, but also often closely resemble reactive mesothelial cells. It is important to be aware of this latter pattern so that IHC markers can be applied.
S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
留言 (0)