Utility of BAP1, p16 and MTAP immunohistochemistry in cytological and histological samples of pleural mesotheliomas
Abstract
Introduction:
In most cases the diagnostic workup of pleural mesotheliomas (MPM) starts with cytological examination of pleural effusion, but histology is needed to confirm the diagnosis. The introduction of BAP1 and MTAP immunohistochemistry have become a powerful tool to confirm the malignant nature of mesothelial proliferations also in cytological specimens. The objective of this study is to determine the concordance of BAP1, MTAP and p16 expression between cytological and histological samples of patients with MPM.
Methods:
Immunohistochemistry of BAP1, MTAP and p16 was performed on cytological samples and compared with the corresponding histological specimen of 25 patients with MPM. Inflammatory and stromal cells served as positive internal control for all three markers. In addition, samples of 11 patients with reactive mesothelial proliferations served as an external control group.
Results:
Loss of BAP1, MTAP and p16 expression was found in 68%, 72% and 92% of MPM, respectively. Loss of MTAP was associated with loss of p16 expression in all cases. Concordance of BAP1 between cytological and corresponding histological samples was 100% (kappa coefficient 1; p = 0.008). For MTAP and p16 kappa coefficient was 0.9 (p = 0.01) and 0.8 (p = 0.7788), respectively.
Conclusions:
Concordant BAP1, MTAP and p16 expression is found between cytological and corresponding histological samples, indicating that a reliable diagnosis of MPM can be made on cytology only. Of the three markers BAP1 and MTAP are most reliable in distinguishing malignant from reactive mesothelial proliferations
The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
留言 (0)