Ali, M.S., Groenwold, R.H., Klungel, O.H.: Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: propensity score methods in clinical nutrition research-3. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. (2016). https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.125914

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ali, M.S., Prieto-Alhambra, D., Lopes, L.C., Ramos, D., Nivea, N., Ichihara, M.Y., Pescarini, J.M., Williamson, E., Fiaccone, R.L., Barreto, M.L., Smeeth, L.: Propensity score methods in health technology assessment: principles, extended applications, and recent advances. Front. Pharmacol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2019.00973

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Austin, P.C.: A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat. Med. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3150

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Austin, P.C.: An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar. Behav. Res. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786

Article  Google Scholar 

Bryson, A., Dorsett, R., Purdon, S.: The use of propensity score matching in the evaluation of active labour market policies. (2002). http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/4993/1/The_use_of_propensity_score_matching_in_the_evaluation_of_active_labour_market_policies.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2022.

Caliendo, M., Kopeinig, S.: Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J. Econ. Surv. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Chan, K.C.G., Yam, S.C.P., Zhang, Z.: Globally efficient nonparametric inference of average treatment effects by empirical balancing calibration weighting. J. R. Stat. Soc. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12129

Article  Google Scholar 

Cochran, W.G.: The planning of observational studies of human populations. J. R. Stat. Soc. (1965). https://doi.org/10.2307/2344179

Article  Google Scholar 

Cochran, W.G.: The effectiveness of adjustment by subclassification in removing bias in observational studies. Biometrics (1968). https://doi.org/10.2307/2528036

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cole, S.R., Hernan, M.A.: Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. Am. J. Epidemiol. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn164

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Desai, R.J., Rothman, K.J., Bateman, B.T., Hernandez-Diaz, S., Huybrechts, K.F.: A propensity-score-based fine stratification approach for confounding adjustment when exposure is infrequent. Epidemiology 28(2), 249–257 (2017)

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fienberg, S.E., Meyer, M.M.: Iterative Proportion Fitting. (1981). https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA102618.pdf. Accessed 27 April 2022

Hainmueller, J.: Entropy balancing for causal effects: a multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Polit. Anal. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr025

Article  Google Scholar 

Hansen, B.B.: Full matching in an observational study of coaching for the SAT. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1198/016214504000000647

Article  Google Scholar 

Hansen, B.B., Klopfer, S.O.: Optimal full matching and related designs via network flows. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X137047

Article  Google Scholar 

Iacus, S.M., King, G., Porro, G.: Multivariate matching methods that are monotonic imbalance bounding. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2011.tm09599

Article  Google Scholar 

Imai, K., King, G., Stuart, E.A.: Misunderstandings between experimentalists and observationalists about causal inference. J. R. Stat. Soc. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2007.00527.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Kang, J.D.Y., Schafer, J.L.: Demystifying double robustness: a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data. Stat. Sci. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1214/07-STS227

Article  Google Scholar 

King, G., Nielsen, R.: Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Polit. Anal. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.11

Article  Google Scholar 

Kolenikov, S.: Calibrating survey data using iterative proportional fitting (raking). Stata J. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1401400104

Article  Google Scholar 

Lechner, M.: A note on the common support problem in applied evaluation studies. Ann. Econ. Stat. (2008). https://doi.org/10.2307/27917246

Article  Google Scholar 

Lee, B.K., Lessler, J., Stuart, E.A.: Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning. Stat. Med. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3782

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lomax, N., Norman, P.: Estimating population attribute values in a table: “get me started in” iterative proportional fitting. Prof. Geogr. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2015.1099449

Article  Google Scholar 

Myers, J.A., Rassen, J.A., Gagne, J.J., Huybrechts, K.F., Schneeweiss, S., Rothman, K.J., Joffe, M.M., Glynn, R.J.: Effects of adjusting for instrumental variables on bias and precision of effect estimates. Am. J. Epidemiol. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr364

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ripollone, J.E., Huybrechts, K.F., Rothman, K.J., Ferguson, R.E., Franklin, J.M.: Evaluating the utility of coarsened exact matching for pharmacoepidemiology using real and simulated claims data. Am. J. Epidemiol. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwz268

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1), 41–55 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41

Article  Google Scholar 

Santacatterina, M., Bottai, M.: Optimal probability weights for inference with constrained precision. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1375932

Article  Google Scholar 

Serdar, C.C., Cihan, M., Yucel, D., Serdar, M.A.: Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem. Med. 31(1), 27–53 (2021)

Article  Google Scholar 

Westreich, D., Lessler, J., Funk, M.J.: Propensity score estimation: neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (cart), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 63(8), 826–833 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.020

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zubizarreta, J.R.: Stable weights that balance covariates for estimation with incomplete outcome data. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 110(511), 910–922 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2015.1023805

Article  CAS  Google Scholar