Learning Curve for Endoscopic Combined Intra-Renal Surgery Using Vacuum-Assisted Device

Mazzon G.a· Claps F.Germinale F.Brusa D.c· Choong S.d· Caruso A.a· Pirozzi M.a· Antonelli A.c· Cerruto M.A.c· Celia A.a

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Urology, San Bassiano Hospital, AULSS7 Pedemontana, Bassano del Grappa, Italy
bDepartment of Urology, Cattinara Hospital, ASUGI Department of Medical Surgical and Health Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
cDepartment of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
dInstitute of Urology, University College Hospitals of London, London, UK

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article Organize, annotate and mark up articles Printing and downloading restrictions apply

Start free trial

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Research Article

Received: October 16, 2022
Accepted: December 14, 2022
Published online: February 21, 2023

Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 0042-1138 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0399 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/UIN

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to provide data related to endoscopic combined intra-renal surgery learning curve using minimally invasive techniques with vacuum-assisted devices. Minimal data exist on the learning curve for these techniques. Methods: We conducted a prospective study monitoring the training of a mentored surgeon learning ECIRS with vacuum assistance. We use varied parameters for improvements. After collection of peri-operative data, tendency lines and CUSUM analysis were used to investigate the learning curves. Results: 111 patients have been included. Guy’s Stone Score 3 and 4 stones 51.3% of all cases. The mostly used percutaneous sheath was 16 Fr (87.3%). SFR was 78.4%. 52.3% patients were tubeless, and 38.7% achieved trifecta. High-degree complication rate was 3.6%. Operative time improved after 72 cases. We observed a decrease of complications throughout the case series, with improvement after 17 cases. In terms of trifecta, proficiency was reached after 53 cases. Proficiency seems achievable in a limited number of procedures, but results did not plateau. Higher number of cases might be necessary for excellence. Discussion: A surgeon learning ECIRS with vacuum assistance can obtain proficiency in 17–50 cases. The number of procedures required for excellence remains unclear. Exclusion of more complex cases might positively affect the training, reducing unnecessary complications.

© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel

References Bryniarski P, Paradysz A, Zyczkowski M, Kupilas A, Nowakowski K, Bogacki R. A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter. J Endourol. 2012;26(1):52–7. Yamaguchi A, Skolarikos A, Buchholz NPN, Chomon GB, Grasso M, Saba P, et al. Operating times and bleeding complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparison of tract dilation methods in 5, 537 patients in the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol. 2011;25(6):933–9. Knoll T, Wezel F, Michel MS, Honeck P, Wendt-Nordahl G. Do patients benefit from miniaturized tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A comparative prospective study. J Endourol. 2010;24(7):1075–9. Jackman SV, Hedican SP, Peters CA, Docimo SG. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: experience with a new technique. Urology. 1998;52(4):697–701. Zeng G, Cai C, Duan X, Xu X, Mao H, Li X, et al. Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a noninferior modality to standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of 20-40mm renal calculi: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2021;79(1):114–21. Li X, He Z, Wu K, Li SK, Zeng G, Yuan J, et al. Chinese minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: the Guangzhou experience. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1693–7. Zeng G, Wan S, Zhao Z, Zhu J, Tuerxun A, Song C, et al. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. BJU Int. 2016;117(4):655–61. Tokas T, Skolarikos A, Herrmann TRW, Nagele U; Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology TRUST-Group. Pressure matters 2: intrarenal pressure ranges during upper-tract endourological procedures. World J Urol. 2019;37(1):133–42. Ibarluzea G, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Poggio M, Porpiglia F, Terrone C, et al. Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int. 2007;100(1):233–6. Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Cossu M, Grande S, Poggio M, Scarpa RM. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol. 2008;54(6):1393–403. Tiselius HG, Andersson A. Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine? Eur Urol. 2003;43(3):275–81. Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM. The Guy’s stone score--grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology. 2011;78(2):277–81. Okhunov Z, Friedlander JI, George AK, Duty BD, Moreira DM, Srinivasan AK, et al. S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi. Urology. 2013;81(6):1154–9. Mazzon G, Choong S, Pavan N, Zeng G, Wu W, Durutovic O, et al. Introducing Trifecta for percutaneous nephrolithotomies: a proposal for standard reporting outcomes after treatment for renal stones. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74(3):351–9. de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, Giusti G, Serrano A, Kandasami SV, et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(2):246–55. Choong S, de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Zeng G, Sarica K, Mazzon G, et al. Classification and standardized reporting of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL): International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus statements. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2021;74(1):110–8. Lim TO, Soraya A, Ding LM, Morad Z. Assessing doctors’ competence: application of CUSUM technique in monitoring doctors’ performance. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14(3):251–8. Cho SY, Choo MS, Jung JH, Jeong CW, Oh S, Lee SB, et al. Cumulative sum analysis for experiences of a single-session retrograde intrarenal stone surgery and analysis of predictors for stone-free status. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84878. Chung KJ, Kim JH, Min GE, Park HK, Li S, Del Giudice F, et al. Changing trends in the treatment of nephrolithiasis in the real world. J Endourol. 2019;33(3):248–53. Ahmad AA, Alhunaidi O, Aziz M, Omar M, Al-Kandari AM, El-Nahas A, et al. Current trends in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an internet-based survey. Ther Adv Urol. 2017;9(9–10):219–26. Cracco CM, Scoffone CM. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) - tips and tricks to improve outcomes: a systematic review. Turk J Urol. 2020;46(Suppl 1):S46–57. Turk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475–82. Zeng G, Zhang T, Agrawal M, He X, Zhang W, Xiao K, et al. Super-Mini Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2018;122(6):1034–40. Pillai SB, Chawla A, de la Rosette J, Laguna P, Guddeti R, Reddy SJ, et al. Super-Mini Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) in the management of renal calculi ≤ 2 cm: a propensity matched study. World J Urol. 2022;40:553–62. Guddeti RS, Hegde P, Chawla A, de la Rosette JJMCH, Laguna Pes MP, Kapadia A. Super-mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus standard PCNL for the management of renal calculi of <2 cm: a randomised controlled study. BJU Int. 2020;126(2):273–9. Zhong W, Wen J, Peng L, Zeng G. Enhanced Super-Mini-PCNL (eSMP): low renal pelvic pressure and high stone removal efficiency in a prospective randomized controlled trial. World J Urol. 2021;39(3):929–34. Zanetti SP, Lievore E, Fontana M, Turetti M, Gallioli A, Longo F, et al. Vacuum-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a new perspective in fragments clearance and intrarenal pressure control. World J Urol. 2021;39(6):1717–23. Tanriverdi O, Boylu U, Kendirci M, Kadihasanoglu M, Horasanli K, Miroglu C. The learning curve in the training of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007;52(1):206–11. Jang WS, Choi KH, Yang SC, Han WK. The learning curve for flank percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a single surgeon’s experience. Korean J Urol. 2011;52(4):284–8. Schilling D, Gakis G, Walcher U, Stenzl A, Nagele U. The learning curve in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: a 1-year retrospective evaluation of a novice and an expert. World J Urol. 2011;29(6):749–53. Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Research Article

Received: October 16, 2022
Accepted: December 14, 2022
Published online: February 21, 2023

Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 0042-1138 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0399 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/UIN

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif