Retrospective analysis of longitudinal melanonychia: A Chinese experience

Introduction

Longitudinal melanonychia (LM) is longitudinal pigmentation on a fingernail or toenail. It can be gray, brown, or black. LM may appear on more than one finger. It can be caused by fungi, bacteria, nail matrix lentigo, nevi of the nail matrix, hyperplasia, benign activation of melanocytes (1), or traumatic nail disorders (2, 3). The width ranges from a thin band to covering the nail, and the clinical feature is variable. LM diagnosis is based on a thorough history, clinical features, and fungal and bacterial cultures (4). It remains a challenge for dermatologists, and histological examination remains the gold standard (3).

Melanocytic activation and hyperpigmentation of the nail matrix epithelium are common causes of LM in adults (5). Four histologic types explain LM entities: pigmentation, inflammation, nail matrix nevus (NMN), and subungual melanoma (SUM). All but SUM are benign lesions. Clinically, NMN produces regular longitudinal brown or black streaks without worrying features. In children, these features may appear in benign lesions (2).

NMN is the most common type in children with LM (6) and sometimes exhibits clinical features similar to SUM. Some features of NMN resemble acral nevi. In the early stage, freckled structures of melanocytes with irregular cell nests are often seen. Melanocytes may present above the basal layer. It is a worrying feature that melanocytes are found in the nail plate (7). The nail fold epithelium may also be involved.

SUM arises from the nail matrix, appears as a black line in the early stage, and gradually infects the entire nail (8). The general characteristics are Hutchinson's sign, nail plate deformity, and irregular pigmentation pattern (5, 9, 10). Hutchinson's sign is the spread of pigment seen on the adjacent skin and proximal/lateral/distal nail folds. It is considered a risk indicator, indicating the growth of nail melanoma. If present, excisional histopathology should be performed to exclude nail melanoma. SUM accounts for 6% of adult LMs (11) and 1%–3% of melanoma in the white race (12). Some studies report that 19%–40% of acral melanoma is SUM (13–16). Thumb, index finger, and hallux are the most affected (17, 18). SUM diagnosis remains a challenge even for specialists, especially in early lesions. The diagnostic criteria include poor circumscription, density of melanocytes, irregular distribution of melanocytes, cytologic atypia, and lymphocytic infiltrate (7, 19, 20). The differences between SUM and NMN lie in uneven color, blurred boundaries, and expanding trends.

In some cases, dermatoscopy may be a tool for the diagnosis of benign or malignant lesions (6). However, nail plate dermatoscopy fails to find the source of pigment in nail matrix epithelium (20). Melanocytes and melanin pigments are difficult to discern; thus, Fontana staining is required to identify melanin, and immunostaining is used to quantify melanocytes. Due to the poor prognosis of some LM types, LM distinction between children and adults remains unclear, and no consistent treatment principles have been developed. More precise delineation of their characteristics is required. In this retrospective study, we explored the differences between adult and pediatric LM and made some recommendations.

Methods

This was a retrospective study on Chinese patients in a single center. A total of 174 LM nails were treated in our hospital from June 2018 to May 2021. Patients were excluded for having trauma, a history of drug use, fungal melanocychia, or endocrine system disease. Inclusion criteria included clinical presentation, surgery of LM, and available follow-up information. All histopathological diagnoses were made independently by two pathologists (Li DM and Wang GN). Any differences in the assessment were resolved by a consensus conference.

Medical records of age, sex, site involved, color, duration, width, Hutchinson's sign, pathology, and follow-up were reviewed. The follow-up ranged from 12 to 36 months. The cases were divided into two groups: children under 18 years and adults above 18 years.

Statistical methods

All statistical analyses were conducted by SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). The tests were conducted by Pearson's χ2. The p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethical information

The study was approved by the Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan, China. The patients were informed fully, there was no interference in diagnosis and treatment, and medical records were collected. All patients signed the written informed consent stating that the information was used only for research (2018-LW-024).

Results Clinical characteristics

A total of 174 pigmented nails from 172 patients (87 men, 85 women; mean age 21.6 years) were assessed. Two cases had more than one lesion (Figure 1). One boy had one on the left hallux and another on the right ring finger. A woman had an SUM on the left index finger and an NMN on the right thumb. Table 1 lists the results. The course ranged from 1 month to 34 years, with an average of 43.66 months. The mean follow-up time was 11.76 months. The children’s group had 106 patients (56 boys, 50 girls; mean age 5.8 years), and the adults’ group had 66 patients (31 men, 35 women; mean age 37.6 years). The widths in adults were wider than in children (p < 0.001). The correlation coefficient between the width and course reached 0.474, and the significance level was 0.1. There was a significant positive correlation between them.

Figure 1. A woman and one boy had two lesions, respectively.

Table 1. Clinical data.

The locations of all lesions are presented in Table 2. Thumbs were the most infected in both groups, but the proportions (29.9% vs. 50.7%) were different; it was considered statistically significant (χ2 = 7.600, p = 0.006). Little fingers in children were significantly more infected than in adults (13.1% > 3.0%, χ2 = 5.033, p = 0.025).

Table 2. Site data.

Histopathologic analysis

LM was divided into four types according to histopathology: pigmentation, lentigo, NMN, and SUM. (1) Pigmentation means pigment in the cuticle or basal layer without nevus cells. (2) In lentigo, melanocytes proliferate but there is no cell nest. (3) In NMN, nevus cells are evident, forming cell nests. There are three types of nevi according to the location of the nevus cells: compound, junctional, and intradermal. (4) In SUM, malignant melanoma occurs under the nail.

Table 3 presents the numbers of respective types. The prevalence of pigmentation in the children’s group was significantly lower (38.3% < 53.7%) than that in the adults’ group (χ2 = 3.968, p = 0.046). The adults’ group had six SUM cases (9.0%), whereas none in children; the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 7.417, p = 0.006). The percentage of NMN in children was higher (56.1% > 34.3%) than in adults; it was statistically significant (χ2 = 7.810, p = 0.005). In NMN cases, compound nevus accounted for 11.7% in children and 65.2% in adults; the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 24.476, p < 0.001). The contribution of junctional nevus in children was significantly greater than in adults (68.3% > 8.7%, χ2 = 23.685, p < 0.001). In the six SUM cases (Table 4), four cases had undergone a biopsy at their first visit without surgery. Later, they came to our hospital for resection after their conditions deteriorated. We suspect that biopsy stimulates the disease to become malignant.

Table 3. Pathological types.

Table 4. Details of six SUM cases.

Prognosis and appearance

Nineteen patients (10.9%) recurred visible bands, 7 (6.5%) in the children’s group and 12 (17.9%) in the adults’ group. The recurrence rate in adults was significantly higher than in children (χ2 = 5.474, p = 0.019). The appearance variations mainly included nail reduction, nail deformity, and no nail (Figure 2). The width and location of bands are correlated closely with the outcome. When the band is in the middle, the remaining nail pieces would be sutured to shrink the wound. Removal of the nail and nail dystrophy can lead to a scar. If the lesion is close to the side, the remaining nail plate and nail bed will be sutured to the skin. A new nail groove will form, and the nail will become narrower.

Figure 2. Left, nail deformity; middle, scar healing; right, nail reduction.

Discussion

Overall, LM is attributed to melanocytic activation, freckles, nevus, and melanoma (1). Exogenous pigments can cause black nails, and the bands are generally irregular and nonlinear (9). The diagnosis of LM is challenging due to various causes. The treatments of LM depend on the etiology and the patient. Most patients do not like to see a band on their fingers/toes. There is no consensus on the need for biopsy to rule out melanoma in children with LM (14–16). The notion that LM is benign in children is worrisome (17). The correlation analysis between the course and width is found to be positive (r = 0.474), which indicates that LM is a progressive disease.

The answers for benign lesions are wait-and-see or excision. Pigmentation does not require any treatment; even if removed, it often recurs. Some studies reported that two LMs recovered spontaneously in children (12, 13), which may be pigmentation based on pathological analysis. It has been reported that lentigo is prone to malignant transformation in Europe and the USA. There are only a few lentigos in this study and no canceration.

SUM is an atypical melanoma with a high incidence in Asia (5, 10). There are six cases in the adults’ group that need our attention. Assessing the regularity of lines is subjective, and early-stage SUM may appear regular. Dermoscopy may provide useful information but is not a substitute for histopathology. There is no way to distinguish them without pathology. Histopathological diagnosis of early SUM is considered very difficult, and false-positive and false-negative results have been achieved in the biopsy. A biopsy is a primary treatment for bands above 4 mm, and recurrence is the main disadvantage in 70% of cases (8). The nails are deformed after biopsy, which affects the appearance. Direct pathological examination after resection is more appropriate. After excision, reconstruction and repair, as described in this study, can improve the appearance maximally. Surgical treatment for in situ SUM removes the nail unit with phalange preservation (21). The defect can be repaired by a skin graft (22). The procedure results in good cosmetic and functional outcomes, and the prognosis is not changed (23). However, amputation is the best option for invasive SUM, preserving the functionality as more as possible (12).

NMN is the most difficult for deciding upon action. Wait-and-see is unacceptable due to the possibility of malignancy. Despite the fact that nail melanoma is rare in children, it does exist. Most NMN lesions first appearing in childhood are junctional nevi (11). In this study, 56.1% of children and only 34.3% of adults had NMN. No intervention may not benefit children with NMN (24, 25). This study shows that children have a lower recurrence rate. We believe that when children are able to cooperate with surgery, active intervention should be performed. Narrower bands preserve more nails and retain as much functionality as possible. Furthermore, some NMN lesions may be underestimated when nevus cells are neglected. The difficulty in diagnosing NMN lies in the early detection of SUM, which requires both clinical features and histopathological characteristics (18).

Therefore, physicians need to increase awareness of resection in NMNs, especially the potential malignancy. Adult NMN may become malignant after biopsy, and extended longitudinal resection is recommended. Imperfect nails are considered better than the risk of malignancy. Self-healing is possible in children, and we need more clinical studies to find the probability.

In summary, when adults find that the lesion color deepens or the width becomes wider in the short term, the lesion needs to be resected immediately. This study has some limitations (e.g., insufficient sample size and being a retrospective study).

Significance

Different from previous methods (dermatoscopy mode), we qualitatively analyzed the pathological types to study LM from another angle. Our study highlighted important pathological differences between children and adults. The overwhelming majority of pediatric cases can be managed conservatively. Lesions in some adults may become malignant and develop into tumors. This requires different treatment options. It is beneficial for LM patients. Under this principle, patients will have a better prognosis with lower risk.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Written informed consent to participate in this study was provided by the participants’ legal guardian/next of kin.

Author contributions

QW contributed to the conception of the study; AL: performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript; YH helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Dominguez-Cherit J, Roldan-Marin R, Pichardo-Velazquez P, Valente C, Fonte-Avalos V, Vega-Memije ME, et al. Melanonychia, melanocytic hyperplasia, and nail melanoma in a hispanic population. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2008) 59(5):785–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.07.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Braun RP, Baran R, Le Gal FA, Dalle S, Ronger S, Pandolfi R, et al. Diagnosis and management of nail pigmentations. J Am Acad Dermatol. (2007) 56(5):835–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.12.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Tosti A, Piraccini BM, de Farias DC. Dealing with melanonychia. Semin Cutaneous Med Surg. (2009) 28(1):49–54. doi: 10.1016/j.sder.2008.12.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Tosti A, Baran R, Piraccini BM, Cameli N, Fanti PA. Nail matrix nevi: a clinical and histopathologic study of twenty-two patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. (1996) 34(5):765–71. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(96)90010-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Goettmann-Bonvallot S, Andre J, Belaich S. Longitudinal melanonychia in children: a clinical and histopathologic study of 40 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. (1999) 41(1):17–22. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70399-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ruben BS. Pigmented lesions of the nail unit: clinical and histopathologic features. Semin Cutaneous Med Surg. (2010) 29(3):148–58. doi: 10.1016/j.sder.2010.06.008