Department of Cardiology II (Electrophysiology), University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price. Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more Select* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication DetailsFirst-Page Preview
Received: May 19, 2022
Accepted: August 04, 2022
Published online: September 29, 2022
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0031-7012 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0313 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PHA
AbstractIntroduction: Hormone-mediated therapies are on the rise and are key therapies in the treatment of some of the most common cancer entities. Proarrhythmic effects have been described in patients treated with SERMs while little to none is known about the electrophysiological effects of the potentially less arrhythmogenic selective estrogen receptor degraders. Methods: Twenty hearts of female New Zealand White rabbits were excised and retrogradely perfused employing a Langendorff setup. An electrophysiology study was performed to obtain CL-dependent action potential duration at 90% of repolarization (APD90), QT interval, effective refractory period (ERP), and post-repolarization refractoriness (PRR = ERP-APD90). After generating baseline data, the hearts were assigned to two groups and perfused with (n = 10) increasing doses of fulvestrant (1 µM and 5 µM; n = 10) or tamoxifen (2.5 µM and 7.5 µM; n = 10), and the protocol was repeated again. Results: Fulvestrant led to a decrease in APD90 and QT interval and an increased PRR. The inducibility of ventricular tachycardia (VT) episodes was unaltered. Tamoxifen showed similar effects, resulting in a shortened APD90 and QT interval and no increased VT incidence in the setting of a prolonged PRR. Conclusion: The present study shows no acute proarrhythmic effect of tamoxifen and fulvestrant in an established whole heart model when employing clinically relevant concentrations.
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
References Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010 Dec 15;127(12):2893–917. Mehta RS, Barlow WE, Albain KS, Vandenberg TA, Dakhil SR, Tirumali NR, et al. Overall survival with fulvestrant plus anastrozole in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 28;380(13):1226–34. Grouthier V, Lebrun-Vignes B, Glazer AM, Touraine P, Funck-Brentano C, Pariente A, et al. Increased long QT and torsade de pointes reporting on tamoxifen compared with aromatase inhibitors. Heart. 2018 Nov;104(22):1859–63. Patel HK, Bihani T. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) in cancer treatment. Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Jun;186:1–24. Fleming CA, Heneghan HM, O’Brien D, McCartan DP, McDermott EW, Prichard RS. Meta-analysis of the cumulative risk of endometrial malignancy and systematic review of endometrial surveillance in extended tamoxifen therapy. Br J Surg. 2018 Aug;105(9):1098–106. Salem JE, Alexandre J, Bachelot A, Funck-Brentano C. Influence of steroid hormones on ventricular repolarization. Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Nov;167:38–47. Barber M, Nguyen LS, Wassermann J, Spano JP, Funck-Brentano C, Salem JE. Cardiac arrhythmia considerations of hormone cancer therapies. Cardiovasc Res. 2019 Apr 15;115(5):878–94. Trump DL, Smith DC, Ellis PG, Rogers MP, Schold SC, Winer EP, et al. High-dose oral tamoxifen, a potential multidrug-resistance-reversal agent: phase I trial in combination with vinblastine. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Dec 2;84(23):1811–6. Pollack IF, DaRosso RC, Robertson PL, Jakacki RL, Mirro JR Jr, Blatt J, et al. A phase I study of high-dose tamoxifen for the treatment of refractory malignant gliomas of childhood. Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Jul;3(7):1109–15. He J, Kargacin ME, Kargacin GJ, Ward CA. Tamoxifen inhibits Na+ and K+ currents in rat ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003 Aug;285(2):H661–8. Thomas D, Gut B, Karsai S, Wimmer AB, Wu K, Wendt-Nordahl G, et al. Inhibition of cloned HERG potassium channels by the antiestrogen tamoxifen. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;368(1):41–8. Chae YJ, Lee KJ, Lee HJ, Sung KW, Choi JS, Lee EH, et al. Endoxifen, the active metabolite of tamoxifen, inhibits cloned hERG potassium channels. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015 Apr 5;752:1–7. Liu XK, Katchman A, Ebert SN, Woosley RL. The antiestrogen tamoxifen blocks the delayed rectifier potassium current, IKr, in rabbit ventricular myocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Dec;287(3):877–83. Lien EA, Solheim E, Ueland PM. Distribution of tamoxifen and its metabolites in rat and human tissues during steady-state treatment. Cancer Res. 1991 Sep 15;51(18):4837–44. Robertson JFR, Erikstein B, Osborne KC, Pippen J, Come SE, Parker LM, et al. Pharmacokinetic profile of intramuscular fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(8):529–38. Franz MR, Gray RA, Karasik P, Moore HJ, Singh SN. Drug-induced post-repolarization refractoriness as an antiarrhythmic principle and its underlying mechanism. Europace. 2014 Nov;16(Suppl 4):iv39–45. Milberg P, Tegelkamp R, Osada N, Schimpf R, Wolpert C, Breithardt G, et al. Reduction of dispersion of repolarization and prolongation of postrepolarization refractoriness explain the antiarrhythmic effects of quinidine in a model of short QT syndrome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007 Jun;18(6):658–64. Valentin JP, Hoffmann P, De Clerck F, Hammond TG, Hondeghem L. Review of the predictive value of the Langendorff heart model (Screenit system) in assessing the proarrhythmic potential of drugs. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2004 May–Jun;49(3):171–81. Hoesl E, Stieber J, Herrmann S, Feil S, Tybl E, Hofmann F, et al. Tamoxifen-inducible gene deletion in the cardiac conduction system. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008 Jul;45(1):62–9. El Gebeily G, Fiset C. Upregulation of ventricular potassium channels by chronic tamoxifen treatment. Cardiovasc Res. 2011 Apr 1;90(1):68–76. Article / Publication DetailsFirst-Page Preview
Received: May 19, 2022
Accepted: August 04, 2022
Published online: September 29, 2022
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0031-7012 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0313 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PHA
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
留言 (0)