Reassessment of a Decade of Experience on Testicular Torsion: Are We Making a Mistake?

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply

Select

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Research Article

Received: April 13, 2022
Accepted: May 22, 2022
Published online: September 05, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0042-1138 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0399 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/UIN

Abstract

Introduction: Testicular torsion is a serious surgical emergency of children. Prompt recognition and exclusion of other acute scrotal causes are essential for avoiding testicular loss. The aim of this study was to evaluate 10 years of experience with testicular torsion, point out our pitfalls in diagnosis and management, determine our likelihood of performing orchiectomy for potentially reversible injury. Material and Method: Records of patients operated for testicular torsion in the last decade were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical findings, symptoms, type of surgery, accuracy of radiological evaluation, and the outcome were analyzed. Orchiectomy specimens were reevaluated and histologically graded to determine the existence of previously undetermined low-grade injury. Results: In total, 107 children were operated for testicular torsion. Presentation included pain 96 (89.7%), scrotal swelling 48 (44.8%). Doppler ultrasonography was performed in 96 patients with false-negative results in 26 (27%). Testicular salvage occurred in 65 (60.7%) patients of which 6 (9.2%) developed subsequent testicular atrophy. Forty-two (33.9%) patients were treated with orchiectomy and histologic reevaluation, and grading of the specimens revealed 4 (9.7%) low-grade injury which indicates a potential of reversible injury. Seventeen (13.7%) patients had normal testicular anatomy in surgery. Conclusion: Surgical exploration is mandated in case of clinical suspicion for testicular torsion even with a normal flow Doppler ultrasound. Macroscopic evaluation does not always correlate with microscopic findings, and a decision according to it may result in excision of potentially viable testis. Further studies are required to determine the actual risk of contralateral autoimmune damage and increase the rate testicular salvageability after testicular torsion.

© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel

References Cost NG, Bush NC, Barber TD, Huang R, Baker LA. Pediatric testicular torsion: demographics of national orchiopexy versus orchiectomy rates. J Urol. 2011;185(6S):2459–63. Barbosa JA, Tiseo BC, Barayan GA, Rosman BM, Torricelli FCM, Passerotti CC, et al. Development and initial validation of a scoring system to diagnose testicular torsion in children. J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1859–64. Aworanti O, Hajduk P, Devaney D, Quinn F, Awadalla S. Incidence of low-grade testicular injury in orchidectomy specimens post-testicular torsion. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Oct;28(05):433–8. Arda IS, Ozyaylali I. Testicular tissue bleeding as an indicator of gonadal salvageability in testicular torsion surgery. BJU Int. 2001 Jan;87(1):89–92. Mikuz G. Testicular torsion: simple grading for histological evaluation of tissue damage. Appl Pathol. 1985;3(3):134–9. Sessions AE, Rabinowitz R, Hulbert WC, Goldstein MM, Mevorach RA. Testicular torsion: direction, degree, duration and disinformation. J Urol. 2003 Feb;169(2):663–5. Mansbach JM, Forbes P, Peters C. Testicular torsion and risk factors for orchiectomy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Dec;159(12):1167–71. Ta A, D’Arcy FT, Hoag N, D’Arcy JP, Lawrentschuk N. Testicular torsion and the acute scrotum: current emergency management. Eur J Emerg Med. 2016Jun;23(3):160–5. Sharp VJ, Kieran K, Arlen AM. Testicular torsion: diagnosis, evaluation, and management. Am Fam Physician. 2013 Dec 15;88(12):835–40. Kapoor S. Testicular torsion: a race against time. Int J Clin Pract. 2008 May;62(5):821–7. Diamond DA, Borer JG, Peters CA, Cilento BG Jr, Sorcini A, Kaefer M, et al. Neonatal scrotal haematoma: mimicker of neonatal testicular torsion. BJU Int. 2003 May;91(7):675–7. Saxena AK, Castellani C, Ruttenstock EM, Höllwarth ME. Testicular torsion: a 15-year single-centre clinical and histological analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2012 Jul;101(7):e282–6. Bowlin PR, Gatti JM, Murphy JP. Pediatric testicular torsion. Surg Clin North Am. 2017 Feb;97(1):161–72. Kalfa N, Veyrac C, Baud C, Couture A, Averous M, Galifer RB. Ultrasonography of the spermatic cord in children with testicular torsion: impact on the surgical strategy. J Urol. 2004 Oct;172(4 Part 2):1692–5; discussion 1695. Boettcher M, Krebs T, Bergholz R, Wenke K, Aronson D, Reinshagen K. Clinical and sonographic features predict testicular torsion in children: a prospective study. BJU Int. 2013 Dec;112(8):1201–6. Hagen P, Buchholz MM, Eigenmann J, Bandhauer K. Testicular dysplasia causing disturbance of spermiogenesis in patients with unilateral torsion of the testis. Urol Int. 1992;49(3):154–7. Mastrogiacomo I, Zanchetta R, Graziotti P, Betterle C, Scrufari P, Lembo A. Immunological and Clinical Study in patients after spermatic cord torsion. Andrologia. 2009;14(1):25–30. Fu GB, Qian LX, Cui YG, Xu ZY, Xuan HB, Zhu JG, et al. Antisperm-antibodies induced by testicular torsion and its influence on testicular function. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2006 Nov;12(11):988–91. Chakraborty J, Hikim APS, Jhunjhunwala JS. Stagnation of blood in the microvasculature of the affected and contralateral testes of men with short-term torsion of the spermatic cord. J Androl. 1985 Sep–Oct;6(5):291–9. Kogan S, Owens G, Tarter T, Nehlsen-Cannarella S, Bennett B, Gill B, et al. Mechanisms of injury in unilateral testis torsion. Eur Urol. 1986;12(3):184–6. Arap MA, Vicentini FC, Cocuzza M, Hallak J, Athayde K, Lucon AM, et al. Late hormonal levels, semen parameters, and presence of antisperm antibodies in patients treated for testicular torsion. J Androl. 2007 Jul–Aug;28(4):528–32. Koşar A, Sarica K, Küpeli B, Alçiğir G, Süzer O, Küpeli S. Testicular torsion: evaluation of contralateral testicular histology. Int Urol Nephrol. 1997;29(3):351–6. Ryan PC, Whelean CA, Fitzpatrick JM. Testicular torsion does not cause autoimmunization in man. Br J Surg. 2005;73(4):325–6. Puri P, Barton D, O’Donnell B. Prepubertal testicular torsion: subsequent fertility. J Pediatr Surg. 1985 Dec;20(6):598–601. Dominguez C, Martinez Verduch M, Estornel F, García F, Hernandez M, García-Ibarra F. Histological study in contralateral testis of prepubertal children following unilateral testicular torsion. Eur Urol. 1994;26(2):160–3. Lian BS, Ong CC, Chiang LW, Rai R, Nah SA. Factors predicting testicular atrophy after testicular salvage following torsion. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2016;26(1):17–21. Cimador M, DiPace MR, Castagnetti M, DeGrazia E. Predictors of testicular viability in testicular torsion. J Pediatr Urol. 2007 Oct;3(5):387–90. Bartsch G, Frank S, Marberger H, Mikuz G. Testicular torsion: late results with special regard to fertility and endocrine function. J Urol. 1980 Sep;124(3):375–8. Turner TT. On unilateral testicular and epididymal torsion: no effect on the contralateral testis. J Urol. 1987 Nov;138(5):1285–90. Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Abstract of Research Article

Received: April 13, 2022
Accepted: May 22, 2022
Published online: September 05, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0042-1138 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0399 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/UIN

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif