A scoping review of local quality improvement using data from UK perioperative National Clinical Audits

Allwood D. Engaging clinicians in quality improvement through National Clinical Audit. London: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP); 2014. https://www.hqip.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/engaging-clinicians-in-qi-through-national-clinical-audit.pdf.

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–25.

Article  Google Scholar 

Baird S. Audit of Scottish Healthcare Audits. 2015.

Google Scholar 

Benn J, Arnold G, D’Lima D, et al. Evaluation of a continuous monitoring and feedback initiative to improve quality of anaesthetic care: a mixed-methods quasi-experimental study. Heal Serv Deliv Res. 2015;3(32):1–248.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bytautas JP, Gheihman G, Dobrow MJ. A scoping review of online repositories of quality improvement projects, interventions and initiatives in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(4):296–303.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Daudt HML, Van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):48.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14(5):319–25.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Dixon N. Proposed standards for the design and conduct of a National Clinical Audit or quality improvement study. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2013;25(4):357–65.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dixon-woods M, Mcnicol S, Martin G. The Health Foundation. Overcoming Challenges to Improving Quality. 2012.

Google Scholar 

Etzioni DA, Wasif N, Dueck AC, et al. Association of hospital participation in a surgical outcomes monitoring program with inpatient complications and mortality. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2015;313(5):505–11.

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Foy R. Study Protocol: Optimising outputs of National Clinical Audits to support orginsations to improve quality of care and clinical outcomes. 2017.

Google Scholar 

Foy R, Skrypak M, Alderson S, et al. Revitalising audit and feedback to improve patient care. BMJ. 2020;368:m213.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S. Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):117.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Gould NJ, Lorencatto F, During C, et al. How do hospitals respond to feedback about blood transfusion practice? A multiple case study investigation. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11):e0206676.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Greenhalgh J, Dalkin S, Gooding K, et al. Functionality and feedback: a realist synthesis of the collation, interpretation and utilisation of patient-reported outcome measures data to improve patient care. Heal Serv Deliv Res. 2017;5(2):1–280.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hemmila MR, Cain-Nielsen AH, Jakubus JL, Mikhail JN, Dimick JB. Association of hospital participation in a regional trauma quality improvement collaborative with patient outcomes. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(8):747–56.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

HQIP. Information governance in local quality improvement. 2017.

Google Scholar 

Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, et al. Audit and feedback : effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes ( review ). Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2012;6(6):CD000259.

Google Scholar 

Ivers NM, Barrett J. Using report cards and dashboards to drive quality improvement: lessons learnt and lessons still to learn. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27:417–20.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Ivers NM, Sales A, Colquhoun H, et al. No more “business as usual” with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention. Implement Sci. 2014;9(1):1–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):1–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Levy SM, Phatak UR, Tsao K, et al. What is the quality of reporting of studies of interventions to increase compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis? J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):770–9.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Jones EL, Dixon-Woods M, Martin GP. Why is reporting quality improvement so hard? A qualitative study in perioperative care. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):1–8.

Google Scholar 

Jones EL, Lees N, Martin G, Dixon-Woods M. How well is quality improvement described in the perioperative care literature? A systematic review. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016;42(5):196–206.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lilford R, Mohammed MA, Spiegelhalter D, Thomson R. Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma. Lancet. 2004;363(9415):1147–54.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

McVey L, Alvarado N, Keen J, et al. Institutional use of National Clinical Audits by healthcare providers. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020;(February):1–8. https://www.nela.org.uk/downloads/The%20Fourth%20Patient%20Report%20of%20the%20National%20Emergency%20Laparotomy%20Audit%202018%20-%20Full%20Patient%20Report.pdf.

Montroy J, Breau RH, Cnossen S, et al. Change in adverse events after enrollment in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0146254.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

NELA Project Team. Fourth patient report of the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. RCoA London. 2018;(November):1–137.

Neuburger J, Currie C, Wakeman R, et al. The impact of a national clinician-led audit initiative on care and mortality after hip fracture in England: an external evaluation using time trends in non-audit data. Med Care. 2015;53(8):686–91.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):986–92.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Peden CJ, Moonesinghe SR. Measurement for improvement in anaesthesia and intensive care. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(2):145–8.

CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Peden CJ, Stephens T, Martin G, et al. Effectiveness of a national quality improvement programme to improve survival after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10187):2213–21.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Phekoo K, Clements J, Bell D. National Clinical Audit Quality Assessment. 2014.

Google Scholar 

RCP, HQIP. Unlocking the potential supporting doctors to use National Clinical Audit to drive improvement. 2018.

Google Scholar 

Robert GB, Anderson JE, Burnett SJ, et al. A longitudinal, multi-level comparative study of quality and safety in European hospitals: the QUASER study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:1–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Roos-Blom M-J, Gude WT, de Jonge E, et al. Impact of audit and feedback with action implementation toolbox on improving ICU pain management: cluster-randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28:1007–15.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ross JS, Williams L, Damush TM, Matthias M. Physician and other healthcare personnel responses to hospital stroke quality of care performance feedback: a qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(6):441–7.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Shah T, Patel-Teague S, Kroupa L, Meyer AND, Singh H. Impact of a national QI programme on reducing electronic health record notifications to clinicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018:bmjqs-2017–007447.

Sinha S, Keenan D, Krishnamoorthy S, Richards M. Workshop report: using trust-level National Clinical Audit data to support quality assurance and quality improvement. HQIP. 2016;(June).

Stephens TJ, Peden CJ, Pearse RM, et al. Improving care at scale: process evaluation of a multi-component quality improvement intervention to reduce mortality after emergency abdominal surgery (EPOCH trial). Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):142.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Sykes M, Thomson R, Kolehmainen N, Allan L, Finch T. Impetus to change: a multi-site qualitative exploration of the national audit of dementia. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):45.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Taylor A, Neuburger J, Walker K, Cromwell D, Groene O. How is feedback from National Clinical Audits used? Views from English National Health Service trust audit leads. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016;21(2):91–100.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, Darzi A, Bell D, Reed JE. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(4):290–8.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

The Bristol Royal Infirmary Inquiry. Learning from Bristol: The Department of Health's Response to the Report of the Public Inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995. 2002. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/273320/5363.pdf.

The King’s Fund. Integrating care throughout the patient’s surgical journey | The King’s Fund. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/events/integrating-care-throughout-patients-surgical-journey. Accessed 30 May 2018.

The Royal College of Anaesthetists. Perioperative medicine the pathway to better surgical care. 2015.

Google Scholar 

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vallance AE, Fearnhead NS, Kuryba A, et al. Effect of public reporting of surgeons ’ outcomes on patient selection, “ gaming”, and mortality in colorectal cancer surgery in England : population based cohort study. BMJ. 2018;361:k1581.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vu JV, Collins SD, Seese E, et al. Evidence that a Regional Surgical Collaborative can transform care: surgical site infection prevention practices for colectomy in Michigan. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226(1):91–9.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Wells S, Tamir O, Gray J, Naidoo D, Bekhit M, Goldmann D. Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A Systematic Review BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(3):226–40.

PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif