1. Botwin, KP, Gruber, RD. Lumbar spinal stenosis: anatomy and pathogenesis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2003;14:1–15. v.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Moon, M-S, Kim, S-S, Sihn, J-C. Lumbar spinal stenosis – a current view. Orthop Trauma 2014;28:396–408.
Google Scholar | Crossref3. Amundsen, T, Weber, H, Lilleås, F, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical and radiologic features. Spine 1995;20:1178–1186.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI4. Bolender, N-F, Schönström, N, Spengler, D. Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:240–246.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI5. Wilmink, J, Penning, L. Influence of spinal posture on abnormalities demonstrated by lumbar myelography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1983;4:656–658.
Google Scholar | Medline6. Zander, DR, Lander, PH. Positionally dependent spinal stenosis: correlation of upright flexion-extension myelography and computed tomographic myelography. Can Assoc Radiol J 1998;49:256–261.
Google Scholar | Medline7. Kanno, H, Endo, T, Ozawa, H, et al. Axial loading during magnetic resonance imaging in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: does it reproduce the positional change of the dural sac detected by upright myelography? Spine 2012;37:E985–EE92.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Jordan, J, Konstantinou, K, O’Dowd, J. Herniated lumbar disc. BMJ Clin Evid 2011;6:1118.
Google Scholar9. Inufusa, A, An, HS, Lim, T-H, et al. Anatomic changes of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen associated with flexion-extension movement. Spine 1996;21:2412–2420.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Takahashi, S, Lord, EL, Hayashi, T, et al. Radiologic factors associated with the dynamic change of dural sac diameter in lumbar spine. Clin Spine Surg 2017;30:E827–E832.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Fujiwara, A, An, HS, Lim, T-H, et al. Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen due to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: an in vitro anatomic and biomechanical study. Spine 2001;26:876–882.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Penning, L, Wilmink, J. Biomechanics of lumbosacral dural sac. A study of flexion-extension myelography. Spine 1981;6:398–408.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Danielson, BI, Willen, J, Gaulitz, A, et al. Axial loading of the spine during CT and MR in patients with suspected lumbar spinal stenosis. Acta Radiol 1998;39:604–611.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI14. Willén, J, Danielson, B, Gaulitz, A, et al. Dynamic effects on the lumbar spinal canal: axially loaded CT-myelography and MRI in patients with sciatica and/or neurogenic claudication. Spine 1997;22:2968–2976.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI15. Tarantino, U, Fanucci, E, Iundusi, R, et al. Lumbar spine MRI in upright position for diagnosing acute and chronic low back pain: statistical analysis of morphological changes. J Orthop Trauma 2013;14:15–22.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Madsen, R, Jensen, TS, Pope, M, et al. The effect of body position and axial load on spinal canal morphology: an MRI study of central spinal stenosis. Spine 2008;33:61–67.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Ali, HI, Saleh, A. Lumbar spine MRI axial loading in patients with degenerative spine pathologies: its impact on the radiological findings and treatment decision. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2015;46:1065–1069.
Google Scholar | Crossref18. Kimura, S, Steinbach, GC, Watenpaugh, DE, et al. Lumbar spine disc height and curvature responses to an axial load generated by a compression device compatible with magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 2001;26:2596–2600.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Lorenc, T, Palczewski, P, Wójcik, D, et al. Diagnostic benefits of axial-loaded magnetic resonance imaging over recumbent magnetic resonance imaging in obese lower back pain patients. Spine 2018;43:1146–1153.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Sasani, H, Solmaz, B, Sasani, M, et al. Diagnostic importance of axial loaded magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected lumbar spinal canal stenosis. World Neurosurg 2019;127:e69–e75.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Sungkarat, W, Laothamatas, J, Worapruekjaru, L, et al. Axial-loaded MRI using a SpineMAC device to show narrowing of dural sac and disc height in lumbar spinal stenosis. J Med Assoc Thai 2020;103:1325–1334.
Google Scholar | Crossref22. Willén, J, Danielson, B. The diagnostic effect from axial loading of the lumbar spine during computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with degenerative disorders. Spine 2001;26:2607–2614.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI23. Hioki, A, Miyamoto, K, Sakai, H, et al. Lumbar axial loading device alters lumbar sagittal alignment differently from upright standing position: a computed tomography study. Spine 2010;35:995–1001.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Kanno, H, Ozawa, H, Koizumi, Y, et al. Changes in lumbar spondylolisthesis on axial-loaded MRI: do they reproduce the positional changes in the degree of olisthesis observed on X-ray images in the standing position? Spine J 2015;15:1255–1262.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI25. Wessberg, P, Danielson, BI, Willén, J. Comparison of Cobb angles in idiopathic scoliosis on standing radiographs and supine axially loaded MRI. Spine 2006;31:3039–3044.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI26. Weber, CI, Hwang, C-T, Van Dillen, LR, et al. Effects of standing on lumbar spine alignment and intervertebral disc geometry in young, healthy individuals determined by positional magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Biomech 2019;65:128–134.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Shrout, PE, Fleiss, JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420–428.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI28. Bland, JM, Altman, D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;327:307–310.
Google Scholar | Crossref29. Portney, LG, Watkins, MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2009.
Google Scholar30. Wren, TA, Aggabao, PC, Poorghasamians, E, et al. Association between vertebral cross-sectional area and lumbar lordosis angle in adolescents. PLoS One 2017;12:e0172844.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Danielson, B, Willén, J. Axially loaded magnetic resonance image of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic individuals. Spine 2001;26:2601–2606.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI32. Hansson, T, Suzuki, N, Hebelka, H, et al. The narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal during loaded MRI: the effects of the disc and ligamentum flavum. Eur Spine J 2009;18:679–686.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI33. Kanno, H, Aizawa, T, Ozawa, H, et al. An increase in the degree of olisthesis during axial loading reduces the dural sac size and worsens clinical symptoms in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine J 2018;18:726–733.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Sungkarat, W, Laothamatas, J, Worapruekjaru, L, et al. Lumbosacral spinal compression device with the use of a cushion back support in supine MRI. Acta Radiol 2021;62:1052–1062.
Google Scholar | Medline35. Hansen, BB, Hansen, P, Grindsted, J, et al. Conventional supine MRI with a lumbar pillow—an alternative to weight-bearing MRI for diagnosing spinal stenosis?: a cross-sectional study. Spine 2017;42:662–669.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Paul, C, Smit, T, de Graaf, M, et al. Quantitative MRI in early intervertebral disc degeneration: t1rho correlates better than T2 and ADC with biomechanics and matrix content. PLoS One 2018;13:e0191442.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline37. O’Connell, GD, Johannessen, W, Vresilovic, EJ, et al. Human internal disc strains in axial compression measured noninvasively using magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 2007;32:2860–2868.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI38. Skelly, AC, Moore, E, Dettori, JR. Comprehensive evidence-based health technology assessment: effectiveness of upright MRI for evaluation of patients with suspected spinal or extra-spinal joint dysfunction. Olympia, WA: Washington State Health Care Authority, 2007.
Google Scholar