1. Stewart, M, Letourneau, N, Masuda, JR. Online solutions to support needs and preferences of parents of children with asthma and allergies. J Fam Nurs 2011; 17: 357–379. DOI: 10.1177/1074840711415416.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI2. Sullivan, C . Cybersupport: empowering asthma caregivers. Pediatr Nurs 2008; 34: 217–224.
Google Scholar | Medline3. Archibald, MM, Caine, V, Ali, S. What is left unsaid: an interpretive description of the information needs of parents of children with asthma. Res Nurs Health 2015; 38: 19–28. DOI: 10.1002/nur.21635.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI4. Gates, LB, Akabas, SH. Meeting the demands of work and responsibilities of caring for a child with asthma: consequences for caregiver well-Being. J Soc Serv Res 2012; 38(5): 656–671.
Google Scholar | Crossref5. Easter, G, Sharpe, L, Hunt, CJ. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Anxious and Depressive Symptoms in Caregivers of Children with Asthma. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 623–632.
Google Scholar6. Foronda, CL, Kelley, CN, Nadeau, C, et al. Psychological and socioeconomic burdens faced by family caregivers of children with asthma: an integrative review. J Pediatr Health Care 2020; 34: 366–376. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2020.02.003.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Parameswaran, S, Kishore, R. Social support in online health communities: a social-network approach. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research, New York, NY, , pp. 93–94.
Google Scholar | Crossref8. Liu, Y, Kornfield, R, Shaw, BR, et al. When support is needed: social support solicitation and provision in an online alcohol use disorder forum. Digit Health 2017; 3: 2055207617704274.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI9. Chuang, KY, Yang, CC. A study of informational support exchanges in medhelp alcoholism community. Social computing. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction, College Park, MD, , pp. 9–17.
Google Scholar | Crossref10. Asim, Y, Malik, AK, Raza, B, et al. A trust model for analysis of trust, influence and their relationship in social network communities. Telemat Inform 2019; 36: 94–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.008.
Google Scholar | Crossref11. Salavati, C, Abdollahpouri, A, Manbari, Z. Ranking nodes in complex networks based on local structure and improving closeness centrality. Neurocomputing 2019; 336: 36–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.04.086.
Google Scholar | Crossref12. Bilecen, B, Cardona, A. Do transnational brokers always win? A multilevel analysis of social support. Social Networks 2018; 53: 90–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2017.03.001.
Google Scholar | Crossref13. Burt, RS . Structural holes and good ideas. Am J Sociol 2004; 110: 349–399. DOI: 10.1086/421787.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI14. Curran, JA, Sibte Raza Abidi, S. Evaluation of an online discussion forum for emergency practitioners. Health Inform J 2007; 13: 255–266. DOI: 10.1177/1460458207079834.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals15. Pan, W, Feng, B, Shen, C. Examining social capital, social support, and language use in an online depression forum: social network and content analysis. J Med Int Res 2020; 22(6): e17365. DOI: 10.2196/17365.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Huffaker, D . Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. Hum Commun Res 2010; 36: 593–617. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01390.x.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI17. Kollock, P . Not for Quotation the Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, 1999.
Google Scholar18. Wasko, MML, Teigland, R, Faraj, S. The provision of online public goods: examining social structure in an electronic network of practice. Decis Support Syst 2009; 47: 254–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.012.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI19. Smithson, J, Sharkey, S, Hewis, E, et al. Problem presentation and responses on an online forum for young people who self-harm. Discourse Stud 2011; 13: 487–501.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI20. Yang, D, Yao, Z, Seering, J, et al. The Channel Maters: self-Disclosure, Reciprocity and Social Support in Online Cancer Support Groups. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, pp. 1–15.
Google Scholar21. Andalibi, N, Haimson, OL, Choudhury, MD, et al. Understanding social media disclosures of sexual abuse through the lenses of support seeking and anonymity. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, . New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 3906–3918.
Google Scholar | Crossref22. Cutrona, CE, Suhr, JA. Social Support Communication in the Context of Marriage: an Analysis of Couples’ Supportive Interactions. Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc, 1994, pp. 113–135.
Google Scholar23. Liu, Y, Kornfield, R, Shaw, BR, et al. Giving and receiving social support in online substance use disorder forums: how self-efficacy moderates effects on relapse. Patient Educ Couns 2020; 103: 1125–1133. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.12.015.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Roberts, CA, Geryk, LL, Sage, AJ, et al. Adolescent, caregiver, and friend preferences for integrating social support and communication features into an asthma self-management app. J Asthma 2016; 53: 948–954. DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2016.1171339.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Chuang, KY, Yang, CC. Helping you to help me: exploring supportive interaction in online health community. Proc Am Soc Inf Sci Tech 2010; 47: 1–10. DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504701140.
Google Scholar | Crossref26. Hui, CY, Walton, R, McKinstry, B, et al. Time to change the paradigm? A mixed method study of the preferred and potential features of an asthma self-management app. Health Inform J 2020; 26: 862–879. DOI: 10.1177/1460458219853381.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI27. Yoo, W, Shah, DV, Chih, M-Y, et al. A smartphone-based support group for alcoholism: effects of giving and receiving emotional support on coping self-efficacy and risky drinking. Health Inform J 2020; 26: 1764–1776. DOI: 10.1177/1460458219888403.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI28. Walther, JB, Boyd, S. Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In: Lin, CA, Atkin, D (eds) Communication Technology and Society: Audience Adoption and Uses. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2002, pp. 153–188.
Google Scholar29. Pan, W, Shen, C, Feng, B. You get what you give: understanding reply reciprocity and social capital in online health support forums. J Health Commun 2017; 22: 45–52. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1250845.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI30. Newman, K, Wang, AH, Wang, AZY. The role of internet-based digital tools in reducing social isolation and addressing support needs among informal caregivers: a scoping review. BMC Pub Health 2019; 19: 1–12. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7837-3.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Wasserman, S, Faust, K. Social Network Analysis Methods and Applications. 6th ed. England, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 175.
Google Scholar | Crossref32. Araujo, T, Neijens, P, Vliegenthart, R. Getting the word out on Twitter: the role of influentials, information brokers and strong ties in building word-of-mouth for brands. Int J Adv 2017; 36: 496–513. DOI: 10.1080/02650487.2016.1173765.
Google Scholar | Crossref33. Brandes, U, Borgatti, SP, Freeman, LC. Maintaining the duality of closeness and betweenness centrality. Soc Net 2016; 44: 153–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.08.003.
Google Scholar | Crossref34. Burt, RS . Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Google Scholar | Crossref35. Gao, Z, Shih, PC. Communities of Support: Social Support Exchange in a HIV Online Forum. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 2019, pp. 37–43.
Google Scholar | Crossref36. Himelboim, I, Han, JY. Cancer talk on Twitter: community structure and information sources in breast and prostate cancer social networks. J Health Commun 2014; 19: 210–225. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.811321.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI37. Chen, B, Huang, T. It is about timing: network prestige in asynchronous online discussions. J Comput Assist Learn 2019; 35(4): 503–515. DOI: 10.1111/jcal.12355.
Google Scholar | Crossref38. Waters, J . Social network behavior, thought-leaders and knowledge building in an online learning community. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), Waikoloa, HI, . IEEE
Google Scholar | Crossref39. Bodendorf, F, Kaiser, C. Detecting Opinion Leaders and Trends in Online Social Networks. New York, NY: ACM Press; 2009, pp. 65–68.
Google Scholar | Crossref40. Baek, SI, Kim, YM. Longitudinal analysis of online community dynamics. Ind Manag Data Syst 2015; 115: 661–677. DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-09-2014-0266.
Google Scholar | Crossref41. Jou, YH, Fukada, H. Stress, health, and reciprocity and sufficiency of social support: the case of university students in japan. J Soc Psychol 2002; 142: 353–370. DOI: 10.1080/00224540209603904.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI42. Bowling, NA, Beehr, TA, Swader, WM. Giving and receiving social support at work: the roles of personality and reciprocity. J Vocat Behav 2005; 67: 476–489. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.004.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI43. Walther, JB, Parks, MR. Cues filtered out, cues filtered in. Handbook Inter Commu 2002; 3: 529–563.
Google Scholar44. Walther, JB, Pingree, S, Hawkins, RP, et al. Attributes of interactive online health information systems. J Med Int Res 2005; 7: e33.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI45. Lepore, SJ, Glaser, DB, Roberts, KJ. On the positive relation between received social support and negative affect: a test of the triage and self‐esteem threat models in women with breast cancer. Psycho Onco 2008; 17: 1210–1215.
Google Scholar | Crossref46. Eichhorn, KC . Soliciting and providing social support over the internet: An investigation of online eating disorder support groups. J Comp Med Commun 2008; 14: 67–78.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI47. Freeman, LC . A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 1977; 40: 35–41. DOI: 10.2307/3033543.
Google Scholar | Crossref48. Sabidussi, G . The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrikao 1966; 31: 581–603.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI49. McHugh, ML . Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica 2012; 22: 276–282.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI50. Osborne, JW . Logistic regression with multiple independent variables: opportunities and pitfalls. In: Best Practices in Logistic Regression. 55 City Road. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Ltd, 2015, p. 243.
Google Scholar | Crossref51. Cutrona, CE, Russell, DW. Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching, 1990.
Google Scholar52. Vlahovic, TA, Wang, Y-C, Kraut, RE, et al. Support matching and satisfaction in an online breast cancer support community. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York, NY: ACM; 2014, pp. 1625–1634.
Google Scholar | Crossref53. Li, S, Feng, B, Wingate, VS. Give thanks for a little and you will find a lot: The role of a support seeker’s reply in online support provision. Commun Monogr 2019; 86: