1. Day, MC, Wadey, R, Strike, S. Living with limb loss: everyday experiences of “good” and “bad” days in people with lower limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 41: 2433–2442.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Dillingham, TR, Pezzin, LE, MacKenzie, EJ. Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States. South Med J 2002; 95: 875–883.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI3. Fortington, LV, Rommers, GM, Geertzen, JH, et al. Mobility in elderly people with a lower limb amputation: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012; 13: 319–325.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI4. Kristinsson, O. The ICEROSS concept: a discussion of a philosophy. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993; 17: 49–55.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI5. Paterno, L, Ibrahimi, M, Gruppioni, E, et al. Sockets for limb prostheses: a review of existing technologies and open challenges. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2018; 65: 1996–2010.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Kapp, S . Suspension systems for prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 361: 55–62.
Google Scholar7. Baars, EC, Schrier, E, Dijkstra, PU, et al. Prosthesis satisfaction in lower limb amputees: a systematic review of associated factors and questionnaires. Medicine 2018; 97: e12296.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Klute, GK, Berge, JS, Biggs, W, et al. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 1570–1575.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. McCurdie, I, Hanspal, R, Nieveen, R. ICEROSS—a consensus view: a questionnaire survey of the use of ICEROSS in the United Kingdom. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997; 21: 124–128.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI10. Baars, EC, Geertzen, JH. Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 2005; 29: 27–37.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI11. Papaioannou, G, Mitrogiannis, C, Nianios, G, et al. Assessment of internal and external prosthesis kinematics during strenuous activities using dynamic roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Prosthet Orthot 2010; 22: 91–105.
Google Scholar | Crossref12. Sanders, JE, Karchin, A, Fergason, JR, et al. A noncontact sensor for measurement of distal residual-limb position during walking. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006; 43: 509–516.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Gholizadeh, H, Abu Osman, NA, Lúvíksdóttir, Ã, et al. A new approach for the pistoning measurement in transtibial prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011; 35: 360–364.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI14. Gholizadeh, H, Osman, NA, Kamyab, M, et al. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In® X5 and Dermo® Liner using motion analysis system. Clin Biomech 2012; 27: 34–39.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI15. Eshraghi, A, Osman, NAA, Gholizadeh, H, et al. Pistoning assessment in lower limb prosthetic sockets. Prosthet Orthot Int 2012; 36: 15–24.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI16. Gallagher, P, MacLachlan, M. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES). Rehabil Psychol 2000; 45: 130.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI17. Boone, DA, Coleman, KL. Use of the prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ). J Prosthet Orthot 2006; 18: P68–P79.
Google Scholar | Crossref18. Hanspal, RS, Fisher, K, Nieveen, R. Prosthetic socket fit comfort score. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 1278–1280.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI19. Hafner, BJ, Morgan, SJ, Askew, RL, et al. Psychometric evaluation of self-report outcome measures for prosthetic applications. J Rehabil Res Dev 2016; 53: 797–812.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Gailey, R, Kristal, A, Lucarevic, J, et al. The development and internal consistency of the comprehensive lower limb amputee socket survey in active lower limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 2019; 43: 80–87.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI21. Beaton, DE, Bombardier, C, Guillemin, F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25: 3186–3191.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI22. Moini, M, Rasouli, MR, Khaji, A, et al. Patterns of extremity traumas leading to amputation in Iran: results of Iranian National Trauma Project. Chin J Traumatol 2009; 12: 77–80.
Google Scholar | Medline23. Gallagher, P, Franchignoni, F, Giordano, A, et al. Trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales: a psychometric assessment using classical test theory and Rasch analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 89: 487–496.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI24. Cohen, J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155–159.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI25. Terwee, CB, Bot, SD, de Boer, MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34–42.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI26. Mokkink, LB, Terwee, CB, Patrick, DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 737–745.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI27. Mazaheri, M, Fardipour, S, Salavati, M, et al. The Persian version of trinity amputation and Prosthetics Experience Scale: translation, factor structure, reliability and validity. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33: 1737–1745.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Portney, LG, Watkins, MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company, 2015, pp. 97–118.
Google Scholar29. Beekman, CE, Axtell, LA. Prosthetic use in elderly patients with dysvascular above-knee and through-knee amputations. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 1510–1516.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI30. Baars, EC, Schrier, E, Dijkstra, PU, et al. Prosthesis satisfaction in lower limb amputees: a systematic review of associated factors and questionnaires. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e12296.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Portney, LG, Watkins, MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company, 2015, pp. 523–538.
Google Scholar32. Webster, JB, Hakimi, KN, Williams, RM, et al. Prosthetic fitting, use, and satisfaction following lower-limb amputation: a prospective study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2012; 49: 1493–1504.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline33. Legro, MW, Reiber, G, del Aguila, M, et al. Issues of importance reported by persons with lower limb amputations and prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev 1999; 36: 155–163.
Google Scholar | Medline34. Dillingham, TR, Pezzin, LE, MacKenzie, EJ, et al. Use and satisfaction with prosthetic devices among persons with trauma-related amputations: a long-term outcome study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80: 563–571.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI35. Gailey, R, McFarland, LV, Cooper, RA, et al. Unilateral lower-limb loss: prosthetic device use and functional outcomes in service members from Vietnam war and OIF/OEF conflicts. J Rehabil Res Dev 2010; 47: 317–331.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Donald, R, Cummings, PMS. Knee disarticulation: prosthetic management. In: Krajbich, JI, Pinzur, MS, Potter, BK, et al. (eds) Atlas of amputations and limb deficiencies: surgical, prosthetic, and rehabilitation principles. 4th ed. Rosemont, IL: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016, pp. 517–524.
Google Scholar37. Akarsu, S, Tekin, L, Safaz, I, et al. Quality of life and functionality after lower limb amputations: comparison between uni-vs. Prosthet Orthot Int 2013; 37: 9–13.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI