1. McFarland, LV, Hubbard Winkler, SL, Heinemann, AW, et al. Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. J Rehabil Res Dev 2010; 47: 299–316.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Biddiss, E, Chau, T. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 86: 977–987.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Biddiss, E, Chau, T. The roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources on upper extremity prosthesis use and abandonment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007; 2: 71–84.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Yamamoto, M, Chung, KC, Sterbenz, J, et al. Cross-sectional international multicenter study on quality of life and reasons for abandonment of upper limb prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7: e2205.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Ostlie, K, Lesjo, IM, Franklin, RJ, et al. Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2012; 7: 294–303.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Wright, TW, Hagen, AD, Wood, MB. Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20: 619–622.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI7. Biddiss, EA, Chau, TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007; 31: 236–257.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI8. Resnik, L, Ekerholm, S, Borgia, M, et al. A national study of veterans with major upper limb amputation: survey methods, participants, and summary findings. PLoS ONE 2019; 14: e0213578.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Biddiss, E, Beaton, D, Chau, T. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2007; 2: 346–357.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Etter, K, Borgia, M, Resnik, L. Prescription and repair rates of prosthetic limbs in the VA healthcare system: implications for national prosthetic parity. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2015; 10: 493–500.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General . Healthcare inspection prosthetic limb care in VA facilities. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General, 2012, p. 88.
Google Scholar12. American Association for Public Opinion Research . Response rates: an overview, https://www.aapor.org/Education-Resources/For-Researchers/Poll-Survey-FAQ/Response-Rates-An-Overview.aspx (accessed 19 June 2020).
Google Scholar13. Touch Bionics, I . i-Limb, https://www.ossur.com/en-us/prosthetics/arms (accessed 31 January 2020).
Google Scholar14. Ottobock . Michaelangelo Hand, http://www.living-with-michelangelo.com/gb/home/ (accessed 22 May 2013).
Google Scholar15. Ottobock . Bebionic Hand, http://bebionic.com/ (accessed 22 May 2013).
Google Scholar16. Kyberd, PJ, Hill, W. Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011; 35: 234–241.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI17. Raichle, KA, Hanley, MA, Molton, I, et al. Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008; 45: 961–972.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Johnson, SS, Mansfield, E. Prosthetic training: upper limb. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2014; 25: 133–151.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Smurr, LM, Gulick, K, Yancosek, K, et al. Managing the upper extremity amputee: a protocol for success. J Hand Ther 2008; 21: 160–175; quiz176.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Resnik, L, Borgia, M, Heinemann, AW, et al. Prosthesis satisfaction in a national sample of Veterans with upper limb amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int 2020; 44: 81–91.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI