Education in prosthetic and orthotic training: Looking back 50 years and moving forward

1. United Nations . Report of the United Nations inter-regional seminar on Standards for the Training of Prosthetists: organized by the United Nations and the Government of Denmark with the co-operation of the International Committee on Prosthetics and Orthotics of the International Society for Rehabilitation of the Disabled. Holte: United Nations, 1969.
Google Scholar2. World Health Organization . Guidelines for training personnel in developing countries for prosthetic and orthotic services. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1990.
Google Scholar3. World Health Organization . Guidelines for training personnel in developing countries for prosthetics and orthotics services. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
Google Scholar4. World Health Organization . WHO standards for prosthetics and orthotics. Part 2: implementation manual. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017.
Google Scholar5. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine . Exploring the role of accreditation in enhancing quality and innovation in health professions education: proceedings of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2017.
Google Scholar6. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics . ISPO education standards for prosthetic orthotic occupations. Brussels: International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics, 2018.
Google Scholar7. International Qualifications . International Qualifications framework, www.iquk.org (2012, accessed 5 June 2020).
Google Scholar8. Frenk, J, Chen, L, Bhutta, ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010; 376: 1923–1958.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. Aminian, G, O’Toole, JM. Undergraduate prosthetics and orthotics programme objectives: a baseline for international comparison and curricular development. Prosthet Orthot Int 2011; 35: 445–450.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI10. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine . Envisioning the future of health professional education: workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2016.
Google Scholar11. Forghany, S, Sadeghi-Demneh, E, Trinler, U, et al. The influence of staff training and education on prosthetic and orthotic service quality: a scoping review. Prosthet Orthot Int 2018; 42: 258–264.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI12. Aminian, G, O’Toole, JM, Mehraban, AH. Undergraduate prosthetics and orthotics teaching methods: a baseline for international comparison. Prosthet Orthot Int 2015; 39: 278–285.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI13. Lusardi, MM, Levangie, PK, Fein, BD. A problem-based learning approach to facilitate evidence-based practice in entry-level health professional education. J Prosthet Orthot 2002; 14: 40–50.
Google Scholar | Crossref14. Kapp, S, Fergason, J. Contemporary students: learning styles and teaching strategies. J Prosthet Orthot 2002; 14: 71–74.
Google Scholar | Crossref15. Lin, RS. Distance learning: an innovative approach to orthotic and prosthetic education. J Prosthet Orthot 2002; 14: 75–77.
Google Scholar | Crossref16. Prosthetics and Orthotics Education: report of the Phoenix conference . Phoenix, 1990.
Google Scholar17. Pryor, W, Smith, F. Impact of the Nippon Foundation’s investment in Exceed Worldwide programs. Brussels: Exceed Worldwide, 2019.
Google Scholar18. Kheng, S. The challenges of upgrading from ISPO category II level to bachelor degree level by distance education. Prosthet Orthot Int 2008; 32: 299–312.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI19. Cruz, MLC, Utay, JB, Mullen, AH. Entrustment trends in orthotic and prosthetic residencies. Prosthet Orthot Int 2020; 44: 73–80.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI20. National Commission on Orthotic and Prosthetic Education . Standards of accreditation for the orthotic/prosthetic residency training program. Washington, DC: National Commission on Orthotic and Prosthetic Education, 2018.
Google Scholar21. Sexton, S. Rehabilitation of people with physical disabilities in developing countries. Brussels: International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics, 2016.
Google Scholar22. Ash, S, O’Connor, J, Anderson, S, et al. A mixed-methods research approach to the review of competency standards for orthotist/prosthetists in Australia. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015; 13: 93–103.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Ramstrand, N, Ramstrand, S. Competency standards for newly graduated prosthetist/orthotists in Sweden. Prosthet Orthot Int 2018; 42: 387–393.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI24. Aduayom-Ahego, A, Ehara, Y. Japanese undergraduate students’ perceptions of prosthetics and orthotics education. Niigata J Health Welf 2018; 18: 46–54.
Google Scholar25. Magnusson, L, Shangali, HG, Ahlstrom, G. Graduates’ perceptions of prosthetic and orthotic education and clinical practice in Tanzania and Malawi. Afr J Disabil 2016; 5: 142–151.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Magnusson, L. Professionals’ perspectives of prosthetic and orthotic services in Tanzania, Malawi, Sierra Leone and Pakistan. Prosthet Orthot Int 2019; 43: 500–507.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI27. Hussain, S. Classroom learning environment in Pakistan Institute of prosthetic and orthotic sciences: students’ perspective. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2011; 23: 170–173.
Google Scholar | Medline28. Aduayom-Ahego, A, Ehara, Y, Anareme, K. Prosthetics and orthotics education in Sub-Saharan Africa: issues and challenges. EC Orthop 2017; 6: 80–81.
Google Scholar29. Aduayom-Ahego, A, Ehara, Y. Current position and challenges in prosthetics and orthotics education in Ghana. Niigata J Health Welf 2016; 16: 26–34.
Google Scholar30. Advanced Education & Research Training Initiative [AERTI]: prosthetic-orthotic strategic plan for a ten-fold increase in the academic and research capacity of the profession . Seattle, WA, 2004.
Google Scholar31. Childress, DS. Editorial. J Prosthet Orthot 2002; 14: 97–101.
Google Scholar | Crossref32. McDonald, CL, Kartin, D, Morgan, SJ. A systematic review in prosthetics and orthotics education research. Prosthet Orthot Int 2020; 44: 116–132.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals33. Educational programs for prosthetists and orthotists at Ponte Vedra Beach . Ponte Vedra, FL: Committee on Prosthetic-Orthotic Education of the Division of Medical Sciences National Research Council, 1970.
Google Scholar34. Ponte Vedra II orthotic/prosthetic future . Ponte Vedra, FL: American Board for Certification in Orthotics and Prosthetics in Collaboration with AOPA and AAOP, 1976.
Google Scholar35. Fishman, S. Prosthetics and orthotics—today and tomorrow. Bull Prosthet Res 1972: 1–3.
Google Scholar36. Nielsen, CC. Issues affecting the future demand for orthotists and prosthetists: update 2002. Washington, DC: National Commission on Orthotic and Prosthetic Education, 2002.
Google Scholar37. Greiner, AC, Knebel, E. Health professions education: a bridge to quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003.
Google Scholar38. Shallal, MA. On the “assessment morass” in higher education: a program level perspective of alignments and tools. Acad J Nawroz Univ 2019; 8: 164–175.
Google Scholar | Crossref39. World Health Organization . Transformative scale up of health professional education. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.
Google Scholar40. Omar, MA, Ismail, MA. Advanced application for direct assessment of course and program learning outcomes in engineering higher education. Int J Adv Appl Sci 2018; 5: 46–52.
Google Scholar41. Commission for Academic Accreditation (CAA) . The Standards for Institutional Licensure and Program Accreditation, https://www.caa.ae/Pages/Guidelines/Accreditation.aspx (2019, accessed 15 July 2020).
Google Scholar42. European Quality Assurance Register for Higher Education. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG) . EQAR, https://www.eqar.eu/kb/esg/ (2015, accessed 8 July 2020).
Google Scholar43. Raschke, S, Ford, N. Report on key points arising from visioning process on prosthetic and orthotic education done at the British Columbia Institute of Technology. J Prosthet Orthot 2002; 14: 23–26.
Google Scholar | Crossref44. International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics , https://www.ispoint.org/default.aspx (2020, accessed 28 April 2020).
Google Scholar45. Jacobs, M. How well are we doing? A survey of the views of graduates 1984-2005. Moshi, Tanzania: Tanzania Training Centre for Orthopaedic Technologists, 2007.
Google Scholar46. Magnusson, L, Ramstrand, N. Prosthetist/orthotist educational experience & professional development in Pakistan. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2009; 4: 385–392.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline47. Hovorka, CF, Shurr, DG, Bozik, DS. The concept of an entry-level interdisciplinary graduate degree preparing orthotists for the new millennium part 1: history of orthotic and prosthetic education. J Prosthet Orthot 2002; 14: 51–58.
Google Scholar | Crossref48. Ramstrand, N, Brodtkorb, T. Considerations for developing an evidenced-based practice in orthotics and prosthetics. Prosthet Orthot Int 2008; 32: 93–102.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI49. Wong, MS. A prospective study on the development of critical thinking skills for student prosthetists and orthotists in Hong Kong. Prosthet Orthot Int 2007; 31: 138–146.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI50. Jarl, G, Ramstrand, N. A model to facilitate implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health into prosthetics and orthotics. Prosthet Orthot Int 2018; 42: 468–475.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI51. Spaulding, SE, Yamane, A, McDonald, CL, et al. A conceptual framework for orthotic and prosthetic education. Prosthet Orthot Int 2019; 43: 369–381.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI52. Hill, S. Threshold concepts in prosthetics. Prosthet Orthot Int 2017; 41: 548–555.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI53. Wong, M, Lemaire, E, Leung, A, et al. Enhancement of prosthetics and orthotics learning and teaching through e-learning technology and methodology. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004; 28: 55–59.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI54. Hagemann, E, Williams, CK, McKee, P, et al. Using model hands for learning orthotic fabrication. Am J Occup Ther 2014; 68: 86–94.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline55. Funk, KP. Student experiences of learning portfolios in occupational therapy education. Occup Ther Health Care 2007; 21: 175–184.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline56. Al Qaroot, BS, Sobuh, M. Does integrating research into the prosthetics and orthotics undergraduate curriculum enhance students’ clinical practice? An interview study on students’ perception. Prosthet Orthot Int 2016; 40: 357–362.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI57. Dhaliwal, U, Singh, S, Singh, N. Reflective student narratives: honing professionalism and empathy. Indian J Med Ethics 2018; 3: 9–15.
Google Scholar | Medline58. Tsingos-Lucas, C, Bosnic-Anticevich, S, Schneider, CR, et al. Using reflective writing as a predictor of academic success in different assessment formats. Am J Pharm Educ 2017; 81: 1–8.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline59. World Health Organization . Joint position paper on the provision of mobility devices in less resourced settings. Geneva: World Health Organization and US AID, 2011.
Google Scholar60. National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine . Crossing the global quality chasm: improving health care world wide. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif