1. HelpAge International . Data on ageing. https://www.helpage.org/resources/ageing-data/ (accessed 9 July 2020).
Google Scholar2. OECD Data . Elderly population. https://doi.org/10.1787/8d805ea1-en (Accessed 9 July 2020).
Google Scholar3. Woolf, SH, Schoomaker, H. Life expectancy and mortality rates in the United States, 1959-2017. JAMA 2019; 322: 1996–2016.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. GBD 2019 Demographics Collaborators . Global age-sex-specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950-2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020; 396: 1160–1203.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Medina, L, Sabo, S, Vespa, J. Living longer: historical and projected life expectancy in the United States, 1960 to 2060. US Department of Commerce, US Census Bureau, 2020.
Google Scholar6. Boland, L, Légaré, F, Perez, MMB, et al. Impact of home care versus alternative locations of care on elder health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. BMC Geriatr 2017; 17: 20.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Parajuli, J, Berish, D, Jao, Y-L. Chronic conditions, functional limitations, and depression in older adults: analysis of a longitudinal study. Innov Aging 2019; 3: S572.
Google Scholar | Crossref8. Kogan, AC, Wilber, K, Mosqueda, L. Person-centered care for older adults with chronic conditions and functional impairment: a systematic literature review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2016; 64: e1–e7.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Ong, AD, Uchino, BN, Wethington, E. Loneliness and health in older adults: a mini-review and synthesis. Gerontology 2016; 62: 443–449.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Taylor, CA, Bouldin, ED, Greenlund, KJ, et al. Comorbid chronic conditions among older adults with subjective cognitive decline, United States, 2015–2017. Innov Aging 2020; 4. DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igz045.
Google Scholar | Crossref11. Fotiadis, DI, Glaros, C, Likas, A. Wearable medical devices. Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering. 2006. DOI: 10.1002/9780471740360.ebs1326.
Google Scholar | Crossref12. Fuller, D, Colwell, E, Low, J, et al. Reliability and validity of commercially available wearable devices for measuring steps, energy expenditure, and heart rate: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8: e18694.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Evenson, KR, Goto, MM, Furberg, RD. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015; 12: 159.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI14. Al-khafajiy, M, Baker, T, Chalmers, C, et al. Remote health monitoring of elderly through wearable sensors. Multimed Tools Appl 2019; 78: 24681–24706.
Google Scholar | Crossref15. Durán-Vega, LA, Santana-Mancilla, PC, Buenrostro-Mariscal, R, et al. An IoT system for remote health monitoring in elderly adults through a wearable device and mobile application. Geriatrics 2019; 4. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics4020034.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Wu, F, Zhao, H, Zhao, Y, et al. Development of a wearable-sensor-based fall detection system. Int J Telemed Appl 2015; 2015: 576364.
Google Scholar | Medline17. Jang, I-Y, Kim, HR, Lee, E, et al. Impact of a wearable device-based walking programs in rural older adults on physical activity and health outcomes: cohort study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018; 6: e11335.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. van Den Berg, MEL, Maeder, AJ. Consumer wearable information and health self management by older adults. Telehealth Our Ageing Soc 2018; 246: 42.
Google Scholar19. Malwade, S, Abdul, SS, Uddin, M, et al. Mobile and wearable technologies in healthcare for the ageing population. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2018; 161: 233–237.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Casselman, J, Onopa, N, Khansa, L. Wearable healthcare: lessons from the past and a peek into the future. Telematics Inform 2017; 34: 1011–1023.
Google Scholar | Crossref21. Gokalp, H, de Folter, J, Verma, V, et al. Integrated telehealth and telecare for monitoring frail elderly with chronic disease. Telemed E-Health 2018; 24: 940–957.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Kekade, S, Hseieh, C-H, Islam, MM, et al. The usefulness and actual use of wearable devices among the elderly population. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2018; 153: 137–159.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Talukder, MS, Sorwar, G, Bao, Y, et al. Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: a combined SEM-Neural Network approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2020; 150: 119793.
Google Scholar | Crossref24. Hoque, R, Sorwar, G. Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: an extension of the UTAUT model. Int J Med Inform 2017; 101: 75–84.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Iancu, I, Iancu, B. Designing mobile technology for elderly. A theoretical overview. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2020; 155: 119977.
Google Scholar | Crossref26. Abouzahra, M, Ghasemaghaei, M. The antecedents and results of seniors’ use of activity tracking wearable devices. Health Policy Technol 2020; 9: 213–217.
Google Scholar | Crossref27. Zhou, M, Zhao, L, Kong, N, et al. Factors influencing behavior intentions to telehealth by Chinese elderly: an extended TAM model. Int J Med Inform 2019; 126: 118–127.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Hauk, N, Hüffmeier, J, Krumm, S. Ready to be a Silver Surfer? A meta-analysis on the relationship between chronological age and technology acceptance. Comput Hum Behav 2018; 84: 304–319.
Google Scholar | Crossref29. Li, J, Ma, Q, Chan, AH, et al. Health monitoring through wearable technologies for older adults: smart wearables acceptance model. Appl Ergon 2019; 75: 162–169.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Loncar-Turukalo, T, Zdravevski, E, Machado da Silva, J, et al. Literature on wearable technology for connected health: scoping review of research trends, advances, and barriers. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21: e14017.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Yusif, S, Soar, J, Hafeez-Baig, A. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform 2016; 94: 112–116.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline32. Gao, Y, Li, H, Luo, Y. An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Ind Manag Data Syst 2015; 115: 1704–1723.
Google Scholar | Crossref33. Yu-Huei, C, Ja-Shen, C, Ming-Chao, W. Why do older adults use wearable devices: a case study adopting the Senior Technology Acceptance Model (STAM). In: 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2019, pp. 1–8. ieeexplore.ieee.org
Google Scholar34. Nikou, S, Agahari, W, Keijzer-Broers, W, et al. Digital healthcare technology adoption by elderly people: a capability approach model. Telematics Inform 2019; 101315.
Google Scholar35. Zhang, M, Luo, M, Nie, R, et al. Technical attributes, health attribute, consumer attributes and their roles in adoption intention of healthcare wearable technology. Int J Med Inform 2017; 108: 97–109.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Lee, SY, Lee, K. Factors that influence an individual’s intention to adopt a wearable healthcare device: the case of a wearable fitness tracker. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2018; 129: 154–163.
Google Scholar | Crossref37. HINTS . Methodology reports, https://hints.cancer.gov/data/methodology-reports.aspx (accessed 26 June 2020).
Google Scholar38. Hesse, BW, Greenberg, AJ, Peterson, EB, et al. The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): a resource for consumer engagement and health communication research. Stud Health Technol Inform 2017; 240: 330–346.
Google Scholar | Medline39. Spooner, KK, Salemi, JL, Salihu, HM, et al. eHealth patient-provider communication in the United States: interest, inequalities, and predictors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24: e18–e27.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline40. Peacock, S, Reddy, A, Leveille, SG, et al. Patient portals and personal health information online: perception, access, and use by US adults. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24: e173–e177.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Carroll, JK, Moorhead, A, Bond, R, et al. Who uses mobile phone health apps and does use matter? A secondary data analytics approach. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19: e125.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline42. Goodwin, J . SAGE secondary data analysis. SAGE, 2012.
Google Scholar43. Heeringa, SG, West, BT, Berglund, PA. Applied survey data analysis. CRC Press, 2010.
Google Scholar | Crossref44. Gitlow, L . Technology use by older adults and barriers to using technology. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 2014; 32: 271–280.
Google Scholar | Crossref45. Peek, STM, Luijkx, KG, Rijnaard, MD, et al. Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontology 2016; 62: 226–237.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI46. Hill, R, Betts, LR, Gardner, SE. Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (Dis)empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Comput Hum Behav 2015; 48: 415–423.
Google Scholar | Crossref47. Vroman, KG, Arthanat, S, Lysack, C. ‘Who over 65 is online?’ Older adults’ dispositions toward information communication technology. Comput Hum Behav 2015; 43: 156–166.
Google Scholar | Crossref48. Teixeira, E, Fonseca, H, Diniz-Sousa, F, et al. Wearable devices for physical activity and healthcare monitoring in elderly people: a critical review. Geriatrics 2021; 6. DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics6020038.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline49. Quaosar, GMAA, Hoque, MR, Bao, Y. Investigating factors affecting elderly’s intention to use m-health services: an empirical study. Telemed J E Health 2018; 24: 309–314.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline50. Lueck, K . Socioeconomic success of Asian immigrants in the United States. J Ethnic Migration Stud 2018; 44: 425–438.
Google Scholar | Crossref51. Escoffery, C . Gender similarities and differences for e-Health behaviors among U.S. adults. Telemed E-Health 2018; 24: 335–343.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline52. Parida, V, Mostaghel, R, Oghazi, P. Factors for elderly use of social media for health-related activities. Psychol Marketing 2016; 33: 1134–1141.
Google Scholar | Crossref53. Niehaves, B, Plattfaut, R. Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. Eur J Inf Syst 2014; 23: 708–726.
Google Scholar | Crossref54. Ramón-Jerónimo, MA, Peral-Peral, B, Arenas-Gaitán, J. Elderly persons and internet use. Soc Sci Comput Rev 2013; 31: 389–403.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI55. Ma, Q, Chan, AHS, Chen, K. Personal and other factors affecting acceptance of smartphone technology by older Chinese adults. Appl Ergon 2016; 54: 62–71.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI56. Gu, D, Feng, Q. COVID-19 and its impacts on older adults: global perspectives. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2021. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbab088.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline57. Peterson, L, Ralston, M. Valued elders or societal burden: cross-national attitudes toward older adults. Int Sociol 2017; 32: 731–754.