1. Gory, B, Berge, J, Bonafe, A, et al. Flow diverters for intracranial aneurysms: the diversion national prospective cohort study. Stroke 2019; 50: 3471–3480.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Sweid, A, Starke, RM, Herial, N, et al. Predictors of complications, functional outcome, and morbidity in a large cohort treated with flow diversion. Neurosurgery 2019; 87: 730–743.
Google Scholar | Crossref3. O’Kelly, CJ, Krings, T, Fiorella, D, et al. A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010; 16: 133–137.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals4. Kamran, M, Yarnold, J, Grunwald, IQ, et al. Assessment of angiographic outcomes after flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a new grading schema. Neuroradiology 2011; 53: 501–508.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI5. Grunwald, IQ, Kamran, M, Corkill, RA, et al. Simple measurement of aneurysm residual after treatment: the smart scale for evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters. Acta Neurochir 2012; 154: 21–26.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Park, MS, Mazur, MD, Moon, K, et al. An outcomes-based grading scale for the evaluation of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 1060–1063.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Roy, D, Milot, G, Raymond, J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001; 32: 1998–2004.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI8. Luo, B, Kang, H, Zhang, H, et al. Pipeline embolization device for intracranial aneurysms in a large Chinese cohort: factors related to aneurysm occlusion. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2020; 13: 1–11.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals9. Kang, H, Zhou, Y, Luo, B, et al. Pipeline embolization device for intracranial aneurysms in a large Chinese cohort: complication risk factor analysis. Neurotherapeutics. Epub ahead of print 14 January 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s13311-020-00990-8.
Google Scholar | Crossref10. Kang, H, Luo, B, Liu, J, et al. Postoperative occlusion degree after flow-diverter placement with adjunctive coiling: analysis of complications. J Neurointerv Surg. 13 May 2021. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017445.
Google Scholar | Crossref11. Wilson, PW, D’Agostino, RB, Levy, D, et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998; 97: 1837–1847.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI12. Senn, S. Review of Fleiss, statistical methods for rates and proportions. Res Synth Methods 2011; 2: 221–222.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Patel, PD, Chalouhi, N, Atallah, E, et al. Off-label uses of the pipeline embolization device: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 42: E4.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Becske, T, Brinjikji, W, Potts, MB, et al. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms trial. Neurosurgery 2017; 80: 40–48.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Hanel, RA, Kallmes, DF, Lopes, DK, et al. Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device: the premier study 1 year results. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12: 62–66.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Mohlenbruch, MA, Herweh, C, Jestaedt, L, et al. The FRED flow-diverter stent for intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy. Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 1155–1161.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI17. De Vries, J, Boogaarts, J, Van Norden, A, et al. New generation of flow diverter (surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013; 44: 1567–1577.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI18. Lubicz, B, Van der Elst, O, Collignon, L, et al. Silk flow-diverter stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a series of 58 patients with emphasis on long-term results. Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 542–546.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI19. Mazur, MD, Taussky, P, Shah, LM, et al. Inter-rater reliability of published flow diversion occlusion scales. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8: 1294–1298.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Raper, DMS, Chen, CJ, Kumar, J, et al. Predicting outcomes for cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: a comparison between 4 grading scales. World Neurosurg 2019; 128: e209–e216.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Cekirge, HS, Saatci, I. A new aneurysm occlusion classification after the impact of flow modification. Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 19–24.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Vakharia, K, Waqas, M, Munich, SA, et al. Is contrast stasis after pipeline embolization device deployment associated with higher aneurysm occlusion rates. World Neurosurg 2020; 133: e434–e442.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Bender, MT, Colby, GP, Lin, LM, et al. Predictors of cerebral aneurysm persistence and occlusion after flow diversion: a single-institution series of 445 cases with angiographic follow-up. J Neurosurg 2018; 130: 259–267.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Shapiro, M, Becske, T, Nelson, PK. Learning from failure: persistence of aneurysms following pipeline embolization. J Neurosurg 2017; 126: 578–585.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Jabbour, P, Chalouhi, N, Tjoumakaris, S, et al. The pipeline embolization device: learning curve and predictors of complications and aneurysm obliteration. Neurosurgery 2013; 73: 113–120.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Adeeb, N, Moore, JM, Wirtz, M, et al. Predictors of incomplete occlusion following pipeline embolization of intracranial aneurysms: is it less effective in older patients? Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38: 2295–2300.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Waqas, M, Vakharia, K, Gong, AD, et al. One and done? The effect of number of pipeline embolization devices on aneurysm treatment outcomes. Interv Neuroradiol 2020; 26: 147–155.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals28. Brinjikji, W, Murad, MH, Lanzino, G, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013; 44: 442–447.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI29. Sadasivan, C, Lieber, BB, Gounis, MJ, et al. Angiographic quantification of contrast medium washout from cerebral aneurysms after stent placement. Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 1214–1221.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI30. Labeyrie, PE, Gory, B, Sadeh-Gonike, U, et al. Early angiographic changes of intra-aneurysmal flow after flow-diverter stent treatment are not predictive of therapeutic success. Interv Neuroradiol 2016; 22: 682–686.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals31. Mut, F, Raschi, M, Scrivano, E, et al. Association between hemodynamic conditions and occlusion times after flow diversion in cerebral aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2015; 7: 286–290.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline32. Spetzler, RF, Martin, NA. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986; 65: 476–483.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI