Racial and ethnic disparities in conversion to mastectomy following lumpectomy

Poggi MM et al (2003) Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute randomized trial. Cancer 98(4):697–702

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Dongen J et al (2000) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1143–1150

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fisher B et al (2002) Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (1995) Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 333(22):1444–1455

Article  Google Scholar 

Kantor O et al (2019) Impact of the Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology margin guidelines on breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy trends. J Am Coll Surg 229(1):104–114

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morrow M et al (2017) Trends in reoperation after initial lumpectomy for breast cancer: addressing overtreatment in surgical management. JAMA Oncol 3(10):1352–1357

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Prakash I et al (2022) Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk, node-negative early breast cancer. Cancer Med 11(4):1099–1108

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Masuda N et al (2017) Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 376(22):2147–2159

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

von Minckwitz G et al (2019) Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 380(7):617–628

Article  Google Scholar 

Lowry KP et al (2020) Long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 112(6):582–589

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moran MS et al (2014) Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88(3):553–564

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Morrow M et al (2016) Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology-American Society of Clinical Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 23(12):3801–3810

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gu J et al (2018) Review of factors influencing women’s choice of mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy in early stage breast cancer: a systematic review. Clin Breast Cancer 18(4):e539–e554

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Atisha DM et al (2015) A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures. Ann Surg Oncol 22(2):361–369

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alderman AK et al (2009) Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study. J Clin Oncol 27(32):5325–5330

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Polacek GN, Ramos MC, Ferrer RL (2007) Breast cancer disparities and decision-making among U.S. women. Patient Educ Couns 65(2):158–165

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bilimoria KY et al (2008) The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol 15(3):683–690

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shippee TP et al (2014) Health insurance coverage and racial disparities in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Womens Health Issues 24(3):e261–e269

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Marinovich M et al (2020) Changes in reoperation after publication of consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg 155(10):e203025

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wilke LG et al (2014) Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004–2010. JAMA Surg 149(12):1296–1305

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaczmarski K et al (2019) Surgeon re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery: a measure of low-value care. J Am Coll Surg 228(4):504-512.e2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang B et al (2019) Trends in unilateral and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy use in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: patterns and predictors. Ann Surg Oncol 26(12):3863–3873

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boyd R et al (2020) On racism: a new standard for publishing on racial health inequities. Health Affairs Blog

Greenup RA et al (2019) Financial costs and burden related to decisions for breast cancer surgery. J Oncol Pract 15(8):e666–e676

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Connors SK et al (2021) Empowered choices: African-American women’s breast reconstruction decisions. Am J Health Behav 45(2):352–370

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sheppard VB et al (2010) Development of decision-support intervention for Black women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 19(1):62–70

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Anderson JN et al (2021) “Nobody Will Tell You. You’ve Got to Ask!”: an examination of patient–provider communication needs and preferences among black and white women with early-stage breast cancer. Health Commun 36(11):1331–1342

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Palmer Kelly E et al (2021) Marginalized patient identities and the patient–physician relationship in the cancer care context: a systematic scoping review. Support Care Cancer 29(12):7195–7207

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haider AH et al (2013) Racial disparities in surgical care and outcomes in the United States: a comprehensive review of patient, provider, and systemic factors. J Am Coll Surg 216(3):482–92.e12

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Landercasper J et al (2015) Toolbox to reduce lumpectomy reoperations and improve cosmetic outcome in breast cancer patients: the American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference. Ann Surg Oncol 22(10):3174–3183

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Valero MG et al (2018) Surgeon variability and factors predicting for reoperation following breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 25(9):2573–2578

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Harrington R et al (2021) A new effort to address racial and ethnic disparities in care through quality measurement. Health Affairs Forefront

Yi SS et al (2022) The mutually reinforcing cycle of poor data quality and racialized stereotypes that shapes Asian American health. Health Aff (Millwood) 41(2):296–303

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Office of Management and Budget, The White House (1997) Revisions to the standards for the classification of federal data on race and ethnicity. The White House, p 58782–58790

Plichta JK et al (2023) Implications of missing data on reported breast cancer mortality. Breast Cancer Res Treat 197(1):177–187

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif