Social connections are differentially related to perceived and physiological age acceleration amongst older adults

Abstract

Human social connections are complex ecosystems formed of structural, functional and quality components. Deficits in social connections are associated with adverse age-related health outcomes, but we know little about the ageing-related mechanistic processes underlying this. Using data from 7,047 adults aged 50+ in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, we explored associations between diverse aspects of social deficits and both perceived and physiological age acceleration, which provide complementary psycho-behavioural and biological mechanistic explanations. We created and validated a novel physiological ageing index using clinical indicators pertaining to the cardiovascular, respiratory, haematologic, metaboloic and cognitive systems using principal component analysis. Doubly-robust estimations using inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment estimators showed that living alone, low social integration and high social isolation were risk factors for physiological age acceleration, with those who lived alone on average 1.9 years older than those who lived with others (95% CI 0.9-3.0 years older; 32% greater age acceleration than people who live with others). However, social deficits were not related to accelerations in perceived age. Analyses were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses and maintained four years later. These findings provide important mechanistic insight that helps to explain the relationship between social deficits and age-related morbitidy and mortality outcomes.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the UK Research and Innovation [MR/Y01068X/1] and grants for the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (NIH: R01AG017644 and NIHR: 198-1074).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The data come from a publicly-available dataset

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data are publicly available at UKDS

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif