French D, Ofec R, Levin L. Long term clinical performance of 10 871 dental implants with up to 22 years of follow-up: a cohort study in 4247 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23(3):289–97.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Howe MS, Keys W, Richards D. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: a systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. J Dent. 2019;84:9–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al-Johany SS, Al Amri MD, Alsaeed S, Alalola B. Dental Implant length and diameter: a proposed classification Scheme. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(3):252–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yu X, Xu R, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Deng F. A meta-analysis indicating extra-short implants (≤ 6 mm) as an alternative to longer implants (≥ 8 mm) with bone augmentation. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8152.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hüsler J, Hämmerle CH, Jung RE. EAO Supplement Working Group 4 - EAO CC 2015 short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(Suppl 11):154–69.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(5):Cd008397.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Magdy M, Abdelkader MA, Alloush S, Fawzy El-Sayed KM, Nawwar AA, Shoeib M, et al. Ultra-short versus standard-length dental implants in conjunction with osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23(4):520–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tolentino da Rosa, de Souza P, Binhame Albini Martini M, Reis Azevedo-Alanis L. Do short implants have similar survival rates compared to standard implants in posterior single crown? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(5):890–901.

Article  Google Scholar 

Felice P, Barausse C, Pistilli R, Ippolito DR, Esposito M. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: result at 8 years after loading from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(4):385–95.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Amato F, Polara G, Spedicato GA. Immediate Loading of fixed partial Dental prostheses on Extra-short and short implants in patients with severe atrophy of the posterior Maxilla or Mandible: an Up-to-4-year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(3):607–15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ravidà A, Wang IC, Barootchi S, Askar H, Tavelli L, Gargallo-Albiol J, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing clinical and patient-reported outcomes between extra-short (≤ 6 mm) and longer (≥ 10 mm) implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(1):118–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Slotte C, Grønningsaeter A, Halmøy AM, Öhrnell LO, Mordenfeld A, Isaksson S, et al. Four-millimeter-long posterior-mandible implants: 5-Year outcomes of a prospective Multicenter Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(Suppl 2):e385–95.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guljé F, Abrahamsson I, Chen S, Stanford C, Zadeh H, Palmer R. Implants of 6 mm vs. 11 mm lengths in the posterior maxilla and mandible: a 1-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(12):1325–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guida L, Esposito U, Sirignano M, Torrisi P, Annunziata M, Cecchinato D. 6 mm short versus 11 mm long inter-foraminal implants in the full-arch rehabilitation of edentulous non-atrophic mandibles: 5-year results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023;34(2):127–36.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guljé FL, Meijer HJA, Abrahamsson I, Barwacz CA, Chen S, Palmer PJ, et al. Comparison of 6-mm and 11-mm dental implants in the posterior region supporting fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results of an open multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(1):15–22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kermanshah H, Keshtkar A, Hassani A, Bitaraf T. Comparing short implants to standard dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up. Evid Based Dent. 2023;24(4):192–3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taschieri S, Lolato A, Testori T, Francetti L, Del Fabbro M. Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: three-year results of a randomized clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(1):9–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pohl V, Thoma DS, Sporniak-Tutak K, Garcia-Garcia A, Taylor TD, Haas R, et al. Short dental implants (6 mm) versus long dental implants (11–15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 3-year results from a multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(4):438–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bitinas D, Bardijevskyt G. Short implants without bone augmentation vs. long implants with bone augmentation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Dent J. 2021;66(Suppl 1):S71–81.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shi JY, Li Y, Qiao SC, Gu YX, Xiong YY, Lai HC. Short versus longer implants with osteotome sinus floor elevation for moderately atrophic posterior maxillae: a 1-year randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(8):855–62.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nielsen HB, Schou S, Bruun NH, Starch-Jensen T. Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Int J Implant Dent. 2021;7(1):66.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cheng YC, Bergamo ETP, Murcko L, Hirayama M, Perpetuini P, Speratti D, et al. Fiber-reinforced composite partial fixed dental prostheses supported by short or extra-short implants: a 10 year retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022;24(6):854–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Papaspyridakos P, De Souza A, Vazouras K, Gholami H, Pagni S, Weber HP. Survival rates of short dental implants (≤ 6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):8–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sáenz-Ravello G, Ossandón-Zúñiga B, Muñoz-Meza V, Mora-Ferraro D, Baeza M, Fan S, et al. Short implants compared to regular dental implants after bone augmentation in the atrophic posterior mandible: umbrella review and meta-analysis of success outcomes. Int J Implant Dent. 2023;9(1):18.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cannizzaro G, Felice P, Leone M, Ferri V, Viola P, Esposito M. Immediate versus early loading of 6.5 mm-long flapless-placed single implants: a 4-year after loading report of a split-mouth randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5(2):111–21.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cannizzaro G, Felice P, Buti J, Leone M, Ferri V, Esposito M. Immediate loading of fixed cross-arch prostheses supported by flapless-placed supershort or long implants: 1-year results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015;8(1):27–36.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Degidi M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Carinci F. Immediately loaded short implants: analysis of a case series of 133 implants. Quintessence Int. 2007;38(3):193–201.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anitua E, Flores C, Flores J, Alkhraisat MH. Clinical effectiveness of 6.5-mm-long implants to support two-Implant fixed prostheses in Premolar-Molar Region: the influence of Immediate Loading and the length of splinting Implant. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e688–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Weerapong K, Sirimongkolwattana S, Sastraruji T, Khongkhunthian P. Comparative study of immediate loading on short dental implants and conventional dental implants in the posterior mandible: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(1):141–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu H, Shi Q, Huang Y, Chang P, Huo N, Jiang Y, et al. Failure risk of short Dental implants under Immediate Loading: a Meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2021;30(7):569–80.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Impact of platform switching on peri-implant bone remodeling around short implants in the posterior region, 1-year results from a split-mouth clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(1):70–80.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Impact of platform switching on inter-proximal bone levels around 8.5 mm implants in the posterior region; 5-year results from a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(3):326–36.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vigolo P, Mutinelli S, Stellini E, Di Fiore A. Influence of platform-switched restoration on bone resorption in patients treated with Wide-Diameter, external-hex-connection Dental implants: a 10-Year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023;38(1):46–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2006;26(1):9–17.

Google Scholar 

Galindo-Moreno P, León-Cano A, Monje A, Ortega-Oller I, O’Valle F, Catena A. Abutment height influences the effect of platform switching on peri-implant marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(2):167–73.