Alderazi YJ, Shastri D, Kass-Hout T, Prestigiacomo CJ, Gandhi CD (2014) Flow diverters for intracranial aneurysms. Stroke Res Treat 2014:415653. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/415653
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Diaz O, Rangel-Castilla L (2016) Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Handb Clin Neurol 136:1303–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53486-6.00067-3
Mirpuri P, Khalid SI, McGuire LS, Alaraj A (2023) Trends in ruptured and unruptured aneurysmal treatment from 2010 to 2020: a focus on flow diversion. World Neurosurg 178:e48–e56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.06.093
Laurent D, Lucke-Wold B, Leary O et al (2022) The evolution of endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms: historical perspective and next frontiers. Neurosci Insights 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/26331055221117560
Ramirez-Velandia F, Filo J, Enriquez-Marulanda A et al (2024) Timing, type, and impact of thromboembolic events caused by flow diversion: a 10-year experience. J Neurosurg. Published online August 16, 2024. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.JNS24476
Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ et al (2016) Risk factors for ischemic complications following pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms: results from the IntrePED study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37(9):1673–1678. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4807
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lv X, Yang H, Liu P, Li Y (2016) Flow-diverter devices in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Neuroradiol J 29(1):66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1971400915621321
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou G, Su M, Yin YL, Li MH (2017) Complications associated with the use of flow-diverting devices for cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 42(6):E17. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS16450
Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Siddiqui AH, Kallmes DF (2015) Risk factors for hemorrhagic complications following pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms: results from the international retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36(12):2308–2313. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4443
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kothari RU, Brott T, Broderick JP et al (1996) The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke 27(8):1304–1305. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.27.8.1304
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Greebe P, Rinkel GJE, Hop JW, Visser-Meily JMA, Algra A (2010) Functional outcome and quality of life 5 and 12.5 years after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol 257(12):2059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5660-y
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ohta T, Murao K, Miyake K, Takemoto K, Nakazawa K (2014) Risk factors for early hemorrhagic complications after endovascular coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR: Am J Neuroradiol 35(11):2136. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4033
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Singhal S et al (2013) Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 44(5):1348–1353. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000641
Orrù E, Roccatagliata L, Cester G, Causin F, Castellan L (2013) Complications of endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Eur J Radiol 82(10):1653–1658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.12.011
Pettersson SD, Khorasanizadeh M, Maglinger B et al (2023) Trends in the age of patients treated for unruptured intracranial aneurysms from 1990 to 2020. World Neurosurg 178:233-240.e13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.007
Brake A, Fry L, Heskett C, De Stefano FA, Lei C, Ebersole K (2023) Flow diversion jet: a dangerous mechanism in the flow diversion treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. Published online May 11, 2023:15910199231175622. https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199231175622
Brunozzi D, See A, Rizko M, Choi J, Atwal G, Alaraj A (2022) Impact of cerebral aneurysm size on distal intracranial hemodynamics and changes following flow diversion. Interv Neuroradiol 28(3):291–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199211032467
Hussein AE, Esfahani DR, Linninger A et al (2017) Aneurysm size and the Windkessel effect: an analysis of contrast intensity in digital subtraction angiography. Interv Neuroradiol. 23(4):357–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019917701100
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Adeeb N, Dibas M, Griessenauer CJ et al (2022) Learning curve for flow diversion of posterior circulation aneurysms: a long-term international multicenter cohort study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 43(11):1615–1620. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7679
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Patel PD, Chalouhi N, Atallah E et al (2017) Off-label uses of the pipeline embolization device: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 42(6):E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1742
Brinjikji W, Cloft HJ, Fiorella D, Lanzino G, Kallmes DF (2013) Estimating the proportion of intracranial aneurysms likely to be amenable to treatment with the pipeline embolization device. J Neurointerv Surg 5(1):45–48. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010165
D’Urso PI, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF (2011) Flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 42(8):2363–2368. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.620328
Clarençon F, Di Maria F, Biondi A, Chiras J, Sourour NA (2013) Distant and delayed (>7 days) hemorrhage after treatment by flow-diverter stents in intracranial aneurysms: a rare but potentially serious complication. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34(7):E81–E82. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3597
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cruz JP, Chow M, O’Kelly C et al (2012) Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(4):603–608. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3065
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cebral JR, Mut F, Raschi M et al (2011) Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(1):27–33. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2398
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wadhwa A, Mensah E, Young M, Ogilvy CS (2024) Variability patterns in dual antiplatelet therapy following endovascular repair of intracranial aneurysms: insight into regimen heterogeneity and the need for a consensus. Acta Neurochir 166(1):271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06137-4
Kim KS, Fraser JF, Grupke S, Cook AM (2018) Management of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures. J Neurosurg 129(4):890–905. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.JNS162307
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Suyama K, Nakahara I, Matsumoto S et al (2024) Efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy with the routine use of prasugrel for flow diversion of cerebral unruptured aneurysms. Clin Neuroradiol 34(1):201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01355-2
Wadhwa A, Ramirez-Velandia F, Mensah E et al (2024) Cost-effectiveness of platelet function testing in dual antiplatelet therapy decision-making after intracranial aneurysm treatment with flow diversion. Neurosurg Rev 47:483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02668-7
Akbari SH, Reynolds MR, Kadkhodayan Y, Cross DT, Moran CJ (2013) Hemorrhagic complications after prasugrel (Effient) therapy for vascular neurointerventional procedures. J Neurointerv Surg 5(4):337–343. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010334
Huang HY, Wang CC, Katz AJ, Lin SY, Lin FJ, Wu CH (2023) Ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in acute myocardial infarction patients with a history of ischemic stroke. Mayo Clin Proc 98(11):1602–1612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.005
留言 (0)