Approach to Architectural Distortion on Digital Mammography—A Prospective Study from Tertiary Care Cancer Center

Durand MA, Wang S, Hooley RJ, Raghu M, Philpotts LE (2016) Tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion: management algorithm with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 36(2):311–321

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pujara AC, Hui J, Wang LC (2019) Architectural distortion in the era of digital breast tomosynthesis: outcomes and implications for management. Clin Imaging 54:133–137

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vedantham S, Karellas A, Vijayaraghavan GR, Kopans DB (2015) Digital breast tomosynthesis: state of the art. Radiology 277(3):663

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Houssami N, Skaane P (2013) Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection. Breast J 22(2):101–108

Article  Google Scholar 

Dhamija E, Gulati M, Deo SV, Gogia A, Hari S (2021) Digital breast tomosynthesis: an overview. Indian J Surg Oncol 12(2):315–329

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ray KM, Turner E, Sickles EA, Joe BN (2015) Suspicious findings at digital breast tomosynthesis occult to conventional digital mammography: imaging features and pathology findings. Breast J 21:538–542

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rageth CJ, O’Flynn EA, Comstock C et al (2016) First International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions). Breast Cancer Res Treat 159(2):203–13

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rao AA, Feneis J, Lalonde C, Ojeda-Fournier H (2016) A pictorial review of changes in the BI-RADS fifth edition. Radiographics 36(3):623–39

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wadhwa A, Majidi SS, Cherian S et al (2021) Architectural distortion on screening digital breast tomosynthesis: pathologic outcomes and indicators of malignancy. J Breast Imaging 3(1):34–43

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bahl M, Lamb LR, Lehman CD (2017) Pathologic outcomes of architectural distortion on digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209:1162–1167

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bahl M, Baker JA, Kinsey EN, Ghate SV (2015) Architectural distortion on mammography: correlation with pathologic outcomes and predictors of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:1339–2134

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Linda A, Tarricone R, Londero V, Girometti R, Zuiani C (2022) Pathological outcome of sonographically occult architectural distortions (AD) visible only on digital breast tomosynthesis, and comparison with AD visible also on 2D mammography. Eur J Radiol 146:110075

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Freer PE, Niell B, Rafferty EA (2015) Preoperative tomosynthesis-guided needle localization of mammographically and sonographically occult breast lesions. Radiology 275(2):377–383

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alshafeiy TI, Nguyen JV, Rochman CM, Nicholson BT, Patrie JT, Harvey JA (2018) Outcome of architectural distortion detected only at breast tomosynthesis versus 2D mammography. Radiology 288:38–46

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Walcott-Sapp S, Garreau J, Johnson N, Thomas KA (2019) Pathology results of architectural distortion on detected with digital breast tomosynthesis without definite sonographic correlate. Am J Surg 217:857–861

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vijapura C, Yang L, Xiong J, Fajardo LL (2018) Imaging features of nonmalignant and malignant architectural distortion detected by tomosynthesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211(6):1397–1404

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sohn V, Arthurs Z, Herbert G et al (2007) Atypical ductal hyperplasia: improved accuracy with the 11-gauge vacuum-assisted versus the 14-gauge core biopsy needle. Ann Surg Oncol 14:2497–2501

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Williams KE, Amin A, Hill J et al (2019) Radiologic and pathologic features associated with upgrade of atypical ductal hyperplasia at surgical excision. Acad Radiol 26:893–899

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Villa-Camacho JC, Bahl M (2022) Management of architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis with nonmalignant pathology at biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 219(1):46–54

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yan P, DeMello L, Baird GL, Lourenco AP (2021) Malignancy upgrade rates of radial sclerosing lesions at breast cancer screening. Radiol Imaging Cancer 3(6):e210036

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vijayaraghavan GR, Newburg A, Vedantham S (2019) Positive predictive value of tomosynthesis-guided biopsies of architectural distortions seen on digital breast tomosynthesis and without an ultrasound correlate. J Clin Imaging Sci 9(53):23

Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif