Emodin, chemically known as 1,3,8-trihydroxy-6-methylanthraquinone, is a naturally occurring anthraquinone compound extensively identified in various herbal medicines, including Rhei Radix et Rhizoma (Wang, 1993), Aloe (Elsohly et al., 2007), Polygoni Cuspidati Rhizoma et Radix (Qian et al., 2008), Polygoni Multiflori Radix (Liang et al., 2010), and Cassiae Semen (Yang et al., 2014). This compound exhibits several pharmacological properties such as purgative effects, hepatoprotective and choleretic activities, lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and antioxidant properties (Semwal et al., 2021).
According to the 2020 edition of China Pharmacopoeia, emodin is recorded as the one of critical index components for assessing the quality of Polygoni Multiflori Radix (PMR). It is stipulated that the combined content of emodin and emodin methyl ether should not be less than 0.1%, underscoring emodin as a crucial bioactive constituent responsible for the pharmacological effects of PMR. However, it is particularly noteworthy that reports of adverse reactions have been increasing with the widespread use of PMR in recent years. Most of these adverse reactions are associated with liver injury of varying severity, with mild cases resolving spontaneously upon drug withdrawal, while severe cases may progress to significant liver injury, liver failure, or even death (Xia et al., 2017; Dai et al., 2023). Emodin, as one of the principal active constituents of PMR raise a question of its potential responsibility for liver toxicity. Several studies have identified anthraquinones as the primary hepatotoxic components in PMR (Wang et al., 2022; Xing et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2021).
However, the deleterious impact of emodin on liver, as well as on organs closely associated with the liver such as the intestine, remains uncertain. Given that anthraquinones are primarily absorbed in the intestine, prolonged consumption of PMR as a tonic agent over a period of three to 6 months may result in sustained stimulation of the intestinal mucosa by anthraquinones like emodin. This prolonged exposure may potentially compromise the integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier. In the event of the intestinal mucosal barrier dysfunction, the increased intestinal permeability permits substantial influx of pathogen-associated factors, such as LPS and other microbial metabolites, into the systemic circulation via the portal vein. This process may exacerbate hepatic inflammation and contributes to liver injury. Consequently, the current study aims to investigate the effects of an 8-week administration of emodin on the intestinal mucosal barrier in mice. Specifically, it examines the impact of varying doses of emodin on the chemical barrier produced by goblet cells, the physical barrier maintained by intestinal endothelial cells, and the biological barrier constituted by the intestinal microbiota. Furthermore, this study seeks to determine the subsequent impact on the liver if emodin induces damage to the intestinal mucosal barrier.
2 Materials and methods2.1 Drug and reagentThe emodin compound (Batch No. 201904-2002), with a purity exceeding 98%, was procured from the Shanghai Research Center for Standardization of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Shanghai, China). Lactobacillus and Enterococcus powder were obtained form Shanghai SINE pharmaceutical Co., LT (Shanghai, China). Primary antibodies targeting ZO-1 and Occludin, along with the secondary antibody of Anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488, were sourced from Affinity (Nanjing, Jiangshu, China). Elisa kits for AST, ALT, TC, and TG were obtained from the Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute (Nanjing, Jiangshu, China). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers were biosynthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining and Oil Red O staining reagents were acquired from Wuhan Seville Biology Co., LT (Wuhan, Hubei, China).
2.2 Animal experimentThirty-two male BALb/c mice (weighing 18–22 g and aged 6–8 weeks) were purchased from the Experimental Animal Resource Center at Guangzhou Medical University (SCXK 2018-0034). The mice were housed under SPF conditions, maintained at a temperature of 20°C–25°C and a humidity level of 55%–65%, with a 12-h light/dark cycle. They were provided with sterilized water and a standard diet. All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The present animal experimental protocol received prior approval from the Animal Care Committee of Guangzhou Medical University.
Following a 1-week acclimatization period, the mice were randomly allocated into four distinct groups: the normal group (NC, n = 8), the low-dose emodin group (Emodin-L, n = 8), the medium-dose emodin group (Emodin-M, n = 8), and the high-dose emodin group (Emodin-H, n = 8). The mice in the normal group received an intragastric administration of a CMC-Na solution once daily. The emodin dosage was determined based on our previous study (Xia et al., 2017) as follows: the dosage for mice was established to be 9.1 folds the equivalent of a daily dose of 30 g of Polygoni Multiflori Radix for a 70-kg adult. The extract yield from Polygoni Multiflori Radix was 6.4%. and the concentration of emodin within the extract was 4.2%. Consequently, the emodin dosage for mice was calculated to be 30 g/70 kg × 9.1 % × 1,000% × 6.4 % × 4.2 % = 10 mg/kg/day. Considering that emodin methyl ether present in the extract can be hydrolyzed into emodin upon entering the body. The low, medium, and high doses of emodin in the current study were set as 2.5-fold, 5-fold, and 10-fold, respectively, relative to the equivalent dose of emodin in the extract. In contrast, the mice in the three treatment groups were administered emodin intragastrically at respective doses of 25 mg/kg/day for the low-dose group, 50 mg/kg/day for the medium-dose group, and 100 mg/kg/day for the high-dose group. The treatment lasted over 8 weeks, during which daily monitoring of body weight and general appearance was conducted. Following the final oral administration of varying emodin, blood samples were collected from the retroorbital venous plexus of the mice under anesthesia. Subsequently, all mice were euthanized via cervical dislocation, and a rapid dissection was performed to extract the ileocecal contents, colon, thymus, spleen, and liver. The organs were immediately weighed and then rapidly frozen using liquid nitrogen. Post-freezing, these tissues were stored at −80°C for subsequent analysis.
2.3 The quantitative analyses of serum lipids and LPSThe concentrations of AST, ALT, TC, and TG in serum were quantitatively assessed using specific ELISA kits designed for each analyte. All experimental protocols adhered strictly to the manufacturer’s instructions. The absorbance measurements for AST, ALT, TC, and TG were obtained at a wavelength of 510 nm. The sample concentrations, expressed in mmol/L, were calculated using the formula: Sample concentrations (mmol/L) = (Sample OD value - blank OD value)/(Standard OD value - blank OD value) × Standard concentration (mmol/L).
The concentrations of LPS was qualified using the double antibody sandwich method. In this assay, a 96-well plate was initially coated with a mouse-derived LPS antibody as the solid phase antibody. Subsequently, samples or standard LPS along with an HRP-conjugated LPS antibody were sequentially introduced to form an antibody-antigen-enzyme-labeled antibody complex. Following this, TMB was added for color development to facilitate color development, resulting in a color change from blue to yellow. The LPS concentration in the sample was determined by measuring the color intensity of the solution, which is directly proportional to the LPS concentration.
2.4 Histopathological examinationInitially, sections of colon and liver tissues underwent HE staining to examine the histopathological alterations induced by varying doses of emodin. The specific procedure for HE staining is as follows: the colon and liver tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for a minimum of 48 h, followed by dehydration through a graded ethanol series, and subsequently embedded in paraffin. The paraffin-embedded tissues were then sectioned into 4 μm slices. These sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin according to the instructions provided with the HE staining kit. Finally, the stained sections were examined under a light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The histological score was determined based on our previous study (He et al., 2021) as follows: the assessment of injury involved summing the scores assigned for the extent of inflammatory cell infiltration, the severity of mucosal damage, and the degree of crypt injury, as outlined below: a score of 0 indicated no evident inflammation, no mucosal damage, and no apparent crypt injury; a score of 1 denoted mild inflammation, mucosal damage, and slight crypt injury; and a score of 2 represented moderate inflammation, damage to both mucosal and submucosal layers, and moderate crypt injury, with only the surface epithelium remaining intact; and a score of 3 exhibited severe inflammation with transmural damage and complete loss of crypts and epithelium.
Subsequently, another portion of liver tissue underwent Oil Red O staining to assess changes in lipid metabolism. Initially, frozen sections of fresh tissue were fixed with formaldehyde calcium for 10 min, followed by rinsing with running water for 1–2 min. The sections were then immersed in 60% isopropyl alcohol before being stained with Oil Red O solution. The staining process continued with differentiation using 60% isopropyl alcohol until the background appeared colorless. Subsequently, the liver nuclei were lightly stained with Mayer’s hematoxylin for 1 min and rinsed with running water for 2 min. The stained liver sections were then observed under the light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
Additionally, Alcian blue (AB) staining was employed to examine alterations in the mucous layer secreted by goblet cells within the colon. The colonic mucous layer serves as an effective chemical barrier by separating intestinal bacteria from the intestinal mucosal epithelial cells. The AB staining procedure was carried out in accordance with the instructions provided in the AB staining kit. In summary, the colon sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated, followed by the application of the AB staining solution for 10 min. Subsequently, the sections were rinsed with running water for 2 min. The nuclei of the colon cells were then lightly counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin for 1 min. Finally, the sections were rinsed with running water for 2 min, and all cleaned sections were dehydrated using a recommended gradient alcohol to render them transparent with xylene. Following this process, the sections were sealed with neutral gum and examined under a light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
Furthermore, immunofluorescent staining was conducted to examine the alterations in two critical tight junction proteins, ZO-1 and Occludin. The paraffin-embedded colon sections underwent deparaffinization, followed by dewaxing with xylene and rehydration through a graded alcohol series. Subsequently, antigen retrieval was performed on all sections three times using a microwave and citrate buffer. The sections were then permeabilized with 0.3% Triton™ X-100 and blocked with 5% goat serum for a brief period. The tissue sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with either anti-ZO-1 or anti-Occludin antibodies at a dilution of 1:100. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibodies at room temperature for 2 h, followed by staining with DAPI for 5 min at room temperature. The sections were then examined using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
2.5 Fecal bacterial DNA extraction and 16S rDNA gene sequencingGenomic DNA was extracted from the cecal contents of each sample. The V3 and V4 regions of the 16S rDNA were amplified using specific primers with barcodes. The primer sequences 341F/806R (341F: 5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′; 806R: 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTATCTAAT-3′) were employed for the PCR amplifications. The PCR protocol included an initial denaturation step at 98°C for 30 s, followed by 35 cycles consisting of denaturation at 98°C for 10 s, annealing at 54°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 45 s. Following amplification, the PCR products were excised and quantified using a fluorometric quantification method. The purified amplified products were subsequently combined in equal proportions. Following this, the sequencing joint was attached, and the sequencing library was constructed. The 16S rDNA gene sequencing of all samples was conducted using the Illumina PE250 platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, United States) to generate paired-end reads.
Upon obtaining the raw reads from the 16S rDNA gene sequencing, low-quality reads were filtered out, and high-quality reads were assembled and re-filtered to acquire valid data for operational taxonomic unit (OTU) clustering. This process utilized the Usearch tool within the QIIME software (version 7.1), employing a 97% sequence similarity threshold to determine the abundance of OTUs. Following the acquisition of OTUs, species annotation, alpha diversity analysis, beta diversity analysis, and community function prediction were conducted using Maffi software (version 7.310). The compositional structure of the intestinal microbiota was characterized using multivariate statistical methods of principal component analysis (PCA), principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS). Additionally, the LDA Effect Size (LefSe) analysis was employed, as referenced from http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/.
2.6 Non-targeted metabolomics analyses of the serumThe endogenous metabolites in serum were quantitatively analyzed by an ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) system using the Q300 kit (Metabo-Profile Biotechnology, China, shanghai) at both ion mode of positive and negative. The original data matrix with the information of peak retention time (RT), mass-to-charge ratio (M/Z), peak identity, peak areas was generated by MassLynx software in UPLC-MS/MS to integrate peak, calibrate and quantify each metabolite. After peak alignment and peak filtering, all data were was set as the raw data matrix in order to enable the comparison of data by multivariate statistical analysis like PCA, PLS-DA, OPLS-DA, random forest, support vector machine learning and univariate statistical analysis, Student-t test, Mann- Whitney-Wilcoxon (U-test), variance analysis and correlation analysis at the differing magnitudes.
2.7 Real-time quantitative PCR and Western blot analysesReal-time quantitative PCR analysis was performed to determinate the mRNA levels of inflammatory factors like TNF-α, IL1β, IL6, IL18, TLR4, Myd88, and P-65. The target gene sequence was derived from the mRNA coding region on PubMed and synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Bioengineering Co., LTD. The specific primers utilized in this study are as follows: TNF-α-Forward (5′-CGCTGAGGTCAATCTGC-3′), TNF-α-Reverse (5′-GGCTGGGTAGAGAATGGA-3′), IL-1β-Forward (5′-TTGAGTCTGCCCAGTTCC-3′), IL-1β-Reverse (5′-TTTCTGCTTGAGAGGTGCT-3′), IL-6-Forward (5′-CAATAACCACCCCTGACC-3′), IL-6-Reverse (5′-GCGCAGAATGAGATGAGTT-3′), IL-18-Forward (5′-TTGTCTCCCAGTGCATTTT-3′), IL-18-Reverse (5′-GGTTCCTTTCCTCTTCCC-3′), TLR4-Forward (5′-ATTTCCGCTTCCTGGTCT-3′), TLR4-Reverse (5′-GTCATCCCACTTCCTTCCT-3′), Myd88-Forward (5′-CCGCCTGTCTCTGTTCTT-3′), Myd88-Reverse (5′-GTCCGCTTGTGTCTCCA-3′), p65-Forward (5′-ATGCGCTTCCGCTACAA-3′), and p65-Reverse (5′-GTGACCAGGGAGATGCG-3′). The standard curve was generated through real-time quantitative PCR amplification. The amplification efficiency was determined base on the slope k of the standard curve, using the formula: amplification efficiency = 101/(−k)−1, where k ranges from −3 to −3.5, amplification efficiency ranges between 0.9 and 1.1. When the amplification efficiencies of the target gene and the reference gene was equivalent (i.e., the difference in their slopes was less than 0.2), the relative expression of the target gene was calculated using the mean relative content = 2−△△Ct.
Western blot analysis was conducted to determine the levels of those key proteins closely associated with the inflammation reaction in liver. The frozen liver tissue blocks were homogenized in ice with 10 times the tissue volume of the extraction reagent (add the protease inhibitor within a few minutes before use). After this homogenization, the homogenate was transferred to a 1.5 mL EP tube and oscillate in ice bath for 30 min, the pipette was used to blow the homogenate repeatedly to ensure complete cell lysis. Finally, the homogenate was centrifugated at 12,000 rpm/min (4°C) for 10 min, the supernatant of the total protein solution was collected to normalize the total protein concentrations with a BCA assay kit. After normalization, all protein samples were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked for 2 h at room temperature with 5% bovine serum albumin. The blocked membranes were initially incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies, followed by a 1-h incubation at room temperature with the corresponding secondary antibodies. The primary antibodies sourced from Cell Signaling Technology, included TLR4, Myd88, P65, p-P65, and GAPDH (Beverly, MA, United States). Protein expression was detected in accordance with the protocol provided by the Tanon ECL detection system (Shanghai, China). Image acquisition and analysis were conducted using the Kodak 4000RPRO gel imaging system (Rochester, NY, United States).
2.8 Animal studies on the application of probiotics and fecal transplantationIn this study, we subsequently conducted animal trials to validate the hepatotoxic effect induced by emodin via intestinal tract.
Initially, probiotics were employed to mitigate emodin-induced hepatic injury in the intestines. Mice were randomly allocated into four groups, each consisting of eight mice: a normal control group and three experimental groups receiving probiotics in combination with emodin at low, medium, and high doses (Probiotics at 1 × 109 CFU/kg/day combined with emodin at 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg/day, respectively). All treatments were administered via gavage over an 8-week period. Upon conclusion of the experiment, serum samples from the mice were collected to assess liver functional indicators, including AST, ALT, and ALP.
Fresh fecal samples from mice in the low and high-dose emodin groups were collected and weighed following the intragastric administration. The fecal samples from each group were then dissolved in normal saline at room temperature, adhering to a mass to volume ration of 1:5. After thorough mixing, larger insoluble particles were filtered out using three layers of gauze repeatedly. The fecal bacterial suspension was initially collected and measured using a 10-mL centrifuge tube to prepare the preliminary fecal bacterial solution. This suspension was subsequently centrifuged at 1,200 rpm/min for 3 min. Following centrifugation, the supernatant was discard, and the normal saline was added to restore the volume to its original level. The mixture was then thoroughly agitated and subjected to centrifugation again. This process was repeated a total of three times to isolate the sediment. The resultant sediment was then dissolved in normal saline to achieve a concentration of 200 mg/mL and was administered to the low-dose (n = 6-7, Faeces-Low-dose) and high-dose (n = 6, Faeces-high-dose) of fecal bacteria transportation groups via gavage for 8 week. At the end of experiment, all mice were anesthetized to facilitate the collection serum and the ileocecal contents for further analyses.
2.9 Statistical analysisIn this study, statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software version 23.0, while graphical representations were generated with GraphPad Prism version 9.0. Experimental data are presented as mean ± SD, contingent upon their conformity with a normal distribution. For multivariate comparisons, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed, followed Tukey’s post hoc test or Student’s t-test, as appropriate. Statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***), and p < 0.0001 (****).
3 Results3.1 The administration of varying doses of emodin over an 8-week period significantly impacted the overall physical condition of the miceThe overall design of the animal experiment is illustrated in Figure 1A. At the conclusion of the study, mice in three treatment groups exhibited characteristic abnormal behaviors, including coarse fur, hyperactivity, aggression, and diarrhea. Notably, the incidence and frequency of diarrhea were higher in the groups receiving emodin doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg/day compared to both the normal group and the low-dose group. Furthermore, a small number of mice administered a 100 mg/kg/day of emodin developed bloody stools and mild prolapse (Figure 1B). Although the majority of mice in three treatment groups developed loose stools, this condition did not significantly affect their food intake or weight (Figures 1C, D). Furthermore, upon dissection of various organs from the mice, it was observed that varying doses of emodin reduced the colon length. As illustrated in Figure 1E, the doses of 25 and 50 mg/kg/day of emodin resulted in a reduction in colon length without reaching statistical significance compared to that in the normal group. However, a dose of 100 mg/kg/day of emodin significantly shortened the colon length (p < 0.01). Meanwhile, Figure 1F revealed that the coefficients of the spleen, thymus, and liver exhibited a dose-dependent increase. In comparison to the normal group, all three treatment doses of emodin led to a significant increase in the spleen coefficient (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively). However, only the 50 and 100 mg/kg/day doses of emodin significantly elevated the thymus coefficient (p < 0.05, p < 0.0001), while the 25 mg/kg dose resulted in a slight, non-significant enhancement. Additionally, the liver coefficient was significantly increased only at the 100 mg/kg/day dose of emodin (p < 0.01).
Figure 1. Observational results regarding the overall condition of mice following 8 weeks of administration of varying doses of emodin: (A) Experimental design for the animal study; (B) Presence of loose or watery stools around the anal region of mice after 8 weeks of emodin treatment; (C) Comparative analysis of food intake among the four groups of mice; (D) Weight changes observed in the four groups of mice throughout the experimental period; (E) Comparison of colon lengths among the four groups; (F) Analysis of organ coefficients for the thymus, spleen, and liver across the four groups. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
3.2 The administration of varying doses of emodin over an 8-week period resulted in remarkable damage to the intestinal mucosal barrier in the miceAs demonstrated in the HE staining images in Figure 2A, the cellular morphology of colonic epithelial cells exhibited significant alterations with increasing doses of emodin. Specifically, administration of 25 mg/kg/day of emodin exerted minimal impact on the cellular morphology, with cells appearing intact and comparable to those in the normal group. In contrast, the 50 mg/kg/day of emodin displayed obvious evidence of colonic mucosal injury and mild inflammatory infiltration. More pronounced colonic injury, characterized by partial degeneration, necrosis of the colonic mucosa, and marked inflammation, was induced by the 100 mg/kg/day dose of emodin. Furthermore, the HE staining scores for the three emodin groups were 0.625, 2.125, and 2.625, corresponding to increasing doses of emodin (refer to Figure 2B). The scores administering 50 and 100 mg/kg/day of emodin were significantly higher than those of the normal group (p < 0.001, p < 0.0001).
Figure 2. Histopathological examination results of the intestinal tract in mice at the experimental endpoint: (A) Representative HE stained images of colon from four experimental groups; (B) Comparative analysis of HE scores across the four groups; (C) Representative AB stained images illustrating the mucus layer secreted by goblet cells in the four groups; (D) Comparative analysis of mucus area-to-issue amount ratio in the four groups; (E) Representative immunofluorescent images of MUC-2 expression in the colon across the four groups; (F) Comparative analysis of MUC-2 immunofluorescent intensity among the four groups; (G) Representative immunofluorescent images of ZO-1 in the colon across the four groups; (H) Comparative analysis of ZO-1 immunofluorescent intensity among the four groups; (I) Representative immunofluorescent images of Occludin in colon for the four groups; (H) Comparative analysis of Occludin immunofluorescent intensity among the four groups. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Subsequently, additional functional indicators associated with the integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier were examined using alternative staining methods. For example, Goblet cells primarily secrete MUC-2 mucin, which in conjunction with water, inorganic salts, and antimicrobial peptides in the intestinal tract, forms the viscous gel-like reticular mucus layers that serve to protect epithelial cells. As shown in the representative images from Figure 2C, it revealed that the thickness of the blue mucous layer was significantly reduced in the group administered with 25 mg/kg/day dose of emodin compared to the normal group. This reduction was more pronounced in the groups receiving 50 and 100 mg/kg/day dose of emodin. Concurrently, the ratio of mucous area to total tissue volume, as depicted in Figure 2D, corroborated these observations, showing a marked decrease to 76.5% (25 mg/kg/day of emodin, p < 0.01), 73.5% (50 mg/kg/day of emodin, p < 0.001), and 67.6% (100 mg/kg/day of emodin, p < 0.0001) relative to the normal group. Moreover, MUC-2 is a predominant component of mucinous glycoprotein involved in the formation of the mucous layer. The relative expression levels of MUC-2 were assessed through immunofluorescent staining, as depicted in Figure 2E. The analysis revealed that the green fluorescence intensity of MUC-2 in the three treatment groups decreased to 73.9% (25 mg/kg/day of emodin, p < 0.05), 88.9% (50 mg/kg/day of emodin, not significant), and 60.8% (100 mg/kg/day of emodin, p < 0.01), Figure 2F relative to the normal group.
In addition to the protective role of the outer mucus layer, tight junction proteins such as ZO-1 and Occludin are crucial for maintaining intestinal barrier integrity. Abnormal localization and expression of ZO-1 and Occludin can directly affect the permeability of intestinal endothelial cells. As demonstrated in Figure 2G, the yellow-green fluorescence intensity of the ZO-1 protein progressively diminished with increasing doses of emodin. Specifically, compared to the normal group, the fluorescence intensity of ZO-1 was significantly reduced in the emodin-treated groups, with values decreasing to 62.8% in the low-dose of emodin group (25 mg/kg/day, p < 0.0001), 61.2% in the medium-dose of emodin group (50 mg/kg/day, p < 0.0001), and 54.4% in the high-dose of emodin group (100 mg/kg/day, p < 0.0001) (refer to Figure 2H). Similarly, the yellow-green fluorescence of Occludin exhibited a dose-dependent reduction across the three treatment groups (refer to Figure 2I), with fluorescence intensity decreasing by 11.5% (p < 0.01), 26.5% (p < 0.0001), and 53.2% (p < 0.0001) in the 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg/day doses of emodin groups, respectively, compared to the normal group (Figure 2J).
3.3 The administration of varying doses of emodin over an 8-week period led to dysbiosis of the in the miceA total of 32 ileocecal samples were analyzed using 16S rDNA gene sequencing, focusing on the V3 and V4 regions across four treatment groups. This analysis yielded 3,118,287 pairs of reads and 3,193,620 clean tags for all samples. The clean tags were then clustered by removing chimeric tags to obtain effective tags.
Subsequently, these effective tags underwent OTU cluster analysis to generate OTU sequences. Venn’s figure analysis was conducted based on the OTU abundance to elucidate the differences in OTUs between the normal group and those emodin treatment groups. As illustrated in Figure 3A. Specifically, the low, medium, and high-doses of emodin groups shared 1,188, 1,184, and 1,119 common OTUs with the normal group, respectively. Additionally, these groups exhibited 393, 617, and 384 unique OTUs, respectively. Utilizing these common and unique OTUs, advanced PCA, PoCA, and NMDS were performed to investigate the variations in intestinal microbial community composition induced by the varying doses of emodin. As presented in Figure 3A, three emodin treatment groups demonstrated clear differentiation from one another, with samples within each group predominantly clustering in the same region. Specifically, in the PCA image, the plots representing the three emodin groups were primarily situated in the lower right quadrant relative to the plots from the normal group. Conversely, in the PCoA and NMDS images, the plots from the three emodin groups were entirely located in the upper right quadrant compared to those from the normal group. This shift indicates that the composition of the intestinal microbial community was influenced to some extent by varying doses of emodin.
Figure 3. Emodin induced the disruption of gut microbiota: (A) the Venn’s analysis and multivariate statistical analysis including PCA, PCo2, and NMDS among four groups based on the OUTs; (B) A histogram depicting the identified gut microbiota phyla across samples; (C) A comparative analysis of the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes as well as Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio among the four groups; (D) A histogram showing the identified gut microbiota genera across samples; (E) A comparative analysis of the relative abundance of Alloprevotella, Bacteroides, and Oscillibacter among the four groups; (F) LEfSe analysis of the gut microbiota between the normal group and the high-dose of emodin group (the LEfSe analysis identified taxa with significant exhibited differential abundant, characterized by a p-value of less than 0.05 and an LDA score exceeding 2.0.). Significance levels are denoted as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Moreover, additional analyses were conducted to investigate which microbial species at phylum and genus level were significantly affected by varying doses of emodin. As illustrated in Figure 3B, the intestinal microbiota in samples from each group predominantly comprised Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria. The administration of emodin influenced the relative abundance of these three phyla bacteria in distinct ways. Specially, the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes decreased while that of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria increased with higher doses of emodin. In particular, the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes in the high-dose of emodin group was reduced to an half of that observed in the normal group (Figure 3C). Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are two predominant bacterial phyla in the human gut microbiota. Numerous studies have demonstrated that Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio is closely associated with obesity and other diseases. In this study, with a decrease in Bacteroidetes and a increase in Firmicutes, it was observed that emodin administration at low, medium, and high doses significantly increased the F/B ratio by 1.3-fold (p < 0.05), 1.7-fold (p < 0.0001), and 1.9-fold (p < 0.0001), respectively, compared to the normal group (Figure 3C). Furthermore, three doses of emodin altered the composition of the intestinal microbiota at the genus level, affecting taxa such as Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group, Ruminiclostridium_9, Alloprevotella, Bacteroides, Oscillibacler, Alistipes, Mucispirillum, Odoribacter, Prevotellaceae _UCG_001, and Blautia. Certain bacterial groups, such as Lachnospiraceae_NK4A13 6_group and Ruminiclostridium_9, exhibited a decrease, while others including Alloprevotella and Bacteroides, showed an increase compare to the initial phase (Figure 3D). Notably, the relative abundance of Alloprevotella, Bacteroidesin, and Oscillibacler increased significantly in this study. Specially, in the middle-dose emodin group, these increases were over 2.8-fold (p < 0.01), 3.1-fold (p < 0.05), and 2.5-fold (p < 0.05), respectively. In the high-dose emodin group, the increase were over 3.8-fold (p < 0.0001), 3.5-fold (p < 0.001), 2.5-fold (p < 0.05) compared to the normal group (Figure 3E).
Simultaneously, the LeFSe analysis was employed to identify the principal differences in intestinal flora taxa, aiming to ascertain the indicator genera associated with the effects of emodin. At the genus level, potential biomarkers distinguished the normal group from the high-dose emodin group were identified using Lefse analysis (LDA>2), as depicted in histogram and branching diagram in Figure 3F. The findings revealed an enrichment of Bacteroides, Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group, and Tyzzerella in the high-dose emodin group. Among these three potential indicator genera, Bacteroides, and Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group are classified within Bacteroidetes phylum, while Tyzzerella is categorized to Firmicutes phylum.
3.4 The administration of varying doses of emodin induced the fatty liver hepatitisLPS, a gut microbial antigen derived from the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria that triggers secretion of inflammatory cytokines. when the integrity of the intestinal mucosal barrier is compromised, there is an increased permeability to LPS, allowing substantial amounts to traverse the barrier, subsequently reaching the liver and precipitating hepatic inflammation. As illustrated in Figure 4A, the levels of LPS in the colon, serum and liver of three emodin treatment groups were significantly higher than those in the normal group. Notably, the serum LPS levels in the medium and high doses emodin groups exhibited a significant increase (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively) compared to the normal group. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the LPS content in the colon and liver of the high-dose emodin group increased by 2.1-fold (p < 0.05) and 1.5-fold (p < 0.01), respectively, relative to the normal group. These findings align with the observation that inflammatory infiltration was prominently present in HE stained sections of liver tissue from both the medium and high-dose emodin groups (Figure 4B). Additionally, the medium-dose emodin group displayed a minor hepatic steatosis, while the high-dose emodin group showed an severe inflammatory infiltration and the presence of lipid vacuoles in the liver tissue. Hepatic HE scores demonstrated a dose-dependent increase. Specially, the HE scores for the low-dose emodin group showed an increase without reaching statistical significance. However, they increased by up to 5.6-fold (p < 0.05) and 8.3-fold (p < 0.001) in the medium-dose and high-dose emodin groups, respectively, compared to the normal group (Figure 4C).
Figure 4. Emodin induced hepatic steatosis in mice: (A) Comparison of LPS levels in the liver, blood, and colon across the four groups; (B) Representative images of HE staining of liver tissues from the four groups; (C) Comparison of HE scores among the four groups; (D) Comparison of the mRNA levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-18 in liver tissues among the four groups; (E) Representative images of Oil-red staining of liver tissues from the four groups; (F) Comparison of the relative red ratio in liver tissues among the four groups; (G) Comparison of ALT, AST, TC, and TG levels in mouse serum across the four groups; (H) Representative protein bands patterns for TLR4, MyD88, p-P65, and P-65; (I) Comparison of the relative proteins expression and mRNA levels of TLR4, MyD88, p-P65, and P-65. Statistical significance is denoted as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Furthermore, during hepatic inflammation, significant alternations were observed in the levels of inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-18 both in the liver and bloodstream. Specially, emodin was found to enhance the mRNA expression levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-18 within the liver (refer to Figure 4D). Administration of three different doses of emodin resulted in a significant upregulation of IL-1β mRNA levels (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, the medium and high doses of emodin markedly increased the mRNA levels of TNF-α (p < 0.05, p < 0.0001) and IL-6 (p < 0.001, p < 0.0001). However, only a high dose of emodin significantly increased the mRNA level of IL-18 (p < 0.001). Numerous studies have indicated that LPS can induce an inflammatory response by activating the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling pathway, thereby promoting liver inflammation and fibrosis (Engelmann et al., 2020; Schneider et al., 2022). The primary effects of emodin on the upstream proteins such as TLR4, Myd88, P-65 were presented in Figures 4H, I, three different doses of emodin were shown to upregulate the relative expression levels of TLR4, MyD88 and P-65 within the TLR4 pathway in liver tissues. The relative expression of TLR4 increased by 1.5-fold in the lose-dose emodin group, 2.91-fold in the medium-dose emodin group (p < 0.0001), and 3.41-fold in the high-dose emodin group (p < 0.0001) compared to the normal group. Concurrently, the administration of emodin at three doses elevated the relative expression of Myd88 by 1.62-fold (p < 0.01), 1.67-fold (p < 0.01), and 1.72-fold (p < 0.01) in a dose-independent manner. Furthermore, the medium and high doses of emodin significantly enhanced the phosphorylation level of protein P-65. Specifically, the ratio of p-P-65/P-65 increased to 2.49-fold in the lose-dose emodin group, 3.39-fold (p < 0.01) in the medium-dose emodin group, and 4.47-fold (p < 0.001) in the high-dose emodin group, respectively, relative to the normal group. Administration of emodin at three doses of emodin resulted in significant upregulation of P-65 mRNA levels, with an increase of 1.18-fold in the lose-dose emodin group (p < 0.05), 1.28-fold in the medium-dose emodin group (p < 0.001), and 1.37-fold in the high-dose emodin group (p < 0.0001). Additionally, two treatments with emodin significantly elevate MyD88 mRNA levels by 36.4% in the medium-dose group (p < 0.01) and 42.2% in the high-dose emodin group (p < 0.001) compared to the normal group. Notably, only the high dose of emodin was found to significantly upregulate TLR4 mRNA levels, with a 1.28-fold increase (p < 0.001).
Despite the observation of emodin-induced liver inflammation, it is important to highlight the concurrent accumulation of fatty acids during the period of emodin administration. As illustrated in Figure 4E, the area represented by the red color (indicating lipid) became increasing prominent. For instance, liver tissue from the low-dose emodin group exhibited only a small number of vacuoles. In contrast, the relative fat area increased by 7.3-fold in the medium-dose emodin group and 9.3-fold in the high-dose emodin group compared to the normal group (Figure 4F). With the elevation of hepatic lipid deposition, there was a significant increase in the levels of TG and TC in the blood. Specifically, administration of a high-dose emodin resulted in a 26.2% increase in TC (p < 0.01) and a 28.4% increase in TG (p < 0.05) compared to the normal group (Figure 4G). Additionally, emodin also facilitated a dose-dependent increase in serum AST and ALT in mice. The AST levels were 1.9-fold (p < 0.01) higher with the low-dose emodin, 2.5-fold (p < 0.0001) with the medium-dose emodin, and 2.9-fold (p < 0.0001) with the high-dose emodin, relative to the normal group. During the study, the ALT levels increased 2.4-fold (p < 0.01, the low-dose emodin), 2.7-fold (p < 0.01, the medium-dose emodin), and 3.6-fold (p < 0.0001, the high-dose emodin) compared to the normal group.
3.5 An 8-week administration of varying doses of emodin significantly disrupted fatty acid metabolism in the blood of miceLiver, being the primary organ responsible for lipid metabolism, was notably affected by varying dose of emodin. This study further employed non-targeted metabolomics to metabolically characterize the lipid metabolism disorder induced by emodin in the blood.
Each metabolite was identified based on the chromatographic peak and mass spectrum fragment information obtained through UPLC-MS/MS analyses (Figure 5A). In totally, sixteen types of the endogenous metabolites were identified. The contents of organic acids, sugars, amino acids, FFAs, and SCFAs constituted more than 99% of all compounds. Notably phenols, carnitines, FFAs, SCFAs, and phenylpropanoids exhibited significant differences among the groups (Figure 5B). Additionally, Figure 5C presents the images of PCA, PLS-DA, and OPLS-DA analyses among the four groups. It is evident that the plots generated by these three multivariate statistical methods exhibit clear separation, clustering in a consistent direction. This outcome indicates that the phenotype of endogenous metabolites in mice has been altered following 8 weeks of emodin administration.
Figure 5. Emodin’s impact on FFAs metabolism in mice: (A) Chromatogram of endogenous metabolites in mouse blood analyzed via UPLC/MS/MS; (B) phenotypic characterization of various metabolites from samples; (C) Multivariate statistical analyses using PCA and OPLS-DA across the four groups; (D) Volcano plot illustrating altered metabolites between the four groups; (E) Z-core analysis of differential metabolites across the four groups; (F) Comparison of the top nine differential metabolites ranked by p-value in unidimensional statistical analysis across the four groups; (G) Heatmap depicting thirty-nine potential biomarkers associated with emodin’s hepatotoxicity; (H) Pathways linked to the endogenous disturbance as predicted by KEGG enrichment analysis. Significance levels are indicated as follows: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Subsequently, a volcanic plot of unidimensional metabolites, with a threshold set as p < 0.05 and |log2FC|>0, was generated to identify the differential metabolites (Figure 5D). In comparison to the normal group, the lose-dose emodin group exhibited an upregulation of 18 metabolites (depicted in light red) and a downregulation of 11 metabolites (depicted in light deep blue). The medium-dose emodin group demonstrated an upregulation of 35 metabolites and a downregulation of 7 metabolites. In contrast, the high-dose emodin group showed an upregulation of 25 metabolites and a downregulation of 11 metabolites. Among these metabolites exhibiting significant variation, the nine most prominent differential metabolites, as determined by p-value ranking in unidimensional statistical analysis, included tryptophan, methyl trans-myristate, butyric acid, 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutyric acid, hydroxyisobutyric acid, hexanoic acid, myristate acid, lauric acid, and oleic acid (Figures 5E, F). Furthermore, a total of 39 metabolites exhibited significant differences between three treatment groups and the normal group, as detailed in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 5G. Notably, 21 of these 39 metabolites were FFAs, including both FFAs and SCFAs. This finding suggests that the observed alternations in FFAs and SCFAs are closely associated with disturbance in intestinal microbiota and hepatic lipid accumulation induced by emodin. Subsequent KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that the metabolic changes resulting from varying doses of emodin primarily impact the biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acid and fatty acid (Figure 5H).
Table 1. Significant differential metabolites between the normal group and three doses of emodin groups.
3.6 Validation of the hepatotoxic effects of emodin via the intestinal tract through the implementation of probiotics and fecal transplantationAs illustrated in Figure 6A, following an 8-week regimen of combined probiotics and emodin administration, no significant alternations were observed in ALT and AST levels in the treatment group compared to the normal group. Similarity, ALT levels remained unchanged in both faeces-low-dose and faeces-high-dose group (Figure 6B). However, AST levels in the faeces-high-dose group were approximately 1.54 folds higher than those in the normal group, indicating a potential hepatotoxic effect of emodin via the intestines.
Figure 6. The impact of combined probiotic administration and fecal transplantation on emodin-induced liver injury: (A) Comparison of ALT and AST levels among groups receiving probiotics in conjunction with emodin at dosages of 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg/day. (B) Comparison of ALT and AST levels among cohorts undergoing fecal transplantation from low-dose and high-dose emodin treatment groups. (C) Species distribution histogram of the intestinal microbiota in mice following fecal transplantation. (D) The heatmap illustrating the composition of the intestinal microbiota across four distinct treatment groups. (E) The Venn analysis of indicator species within the intestinal microbiota of mice following the fecal transplantation. (F) The upset plot of the indicator species among groups. (G) The potential marker species of the intestinal microbiota at the phylum level with the p-value lower than 0.05. (H) Lefse anaysis at genus level between the normal group and the Faeces-high-dose group. (I) OPLS-DA analysis for the endogenous metabolites between the fecal transplantation groups and the normal group. (J) The up and down-regulations of the potential biomarkers with |log2FC|>0. (K) The potential biomarkers with the VIP >1.0. (L) The bubble map for enrichment pathways with significant differences.
Furthermore, 16S rDNA sequencing analysis revealed that the composition of intestinal microflora in mice receiving the fecal transplantation from the lose-dose emodin group was comparable to that observed in the low-dose emodin administration cohort, with no significant differences when compared to the normal group. In contrast, the composition of the microbiota of mice transplanted with faeces from the high-dose emodin group mirrored that of the high-dose emodin administration cohort (Figures 6C, D). Notably, when compared to the normal group, there were significant alternation in microbial phylum within the high-dose faeces transplantation group (Figures 6E, F), characterized by marked increase of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria (Figure 6G). Further analysis using LEfSe analysis revealed significant changes in the genera associated with these three phylum levels between the normal group and the Faeces-High-dose group (Figure 6H). These findings indicate that the impact of transplanted microbiota on the intestinal microecology of mice is fundamentally comparable to that of emodin.
In addition, metabolomics analysis of mice serum from the faeces transplantation groups demonstrated a significant alternation in the metabolite profile compared to the normal group. OPLS-DA effectively differentiated the sample plots corresponding to the Faces-low-dose group, Faeces-high-dose group, and the normal group into two distinct regions (Figure 6I). Based on |log2FC|>0 and VIP>1, twenty differential metabolites were identified between the normal and Faeces-high-dose groups, with 18 metabolites being downregulated and 2 metabolites being upregulated (Figure 6J). The metabolites that exhibited significant alternations were predominantly phospholipids, FFAs, and amino acids (Figure 6K). KEGG enrichment analysis further indicated that the alternations in these metabolites were closely associated with fatty acid degradation and fatty acid metabolism (Figure 6L).
4 DiscussionIf a substantial quantity of anthraquinones is administered over an extended period, it is anticipated to not only persistently stimulate the intestinal tract, but also induce significant reactions in other organs, particularly the liver. However, the precise effects of varying dose of emodin on the intestinal tract and liver have not been extensively studied. Consequently, the current study selects emodin as a representative anthraquinones to explore its potential hepatotoxic effects mediated through the intestinal tract.
Initially, the animal experiment conducted in this study revealed that varying doses of emodin significantly influenced the mental and physical conditions of the mice. In majority of mice in the treatment groups exhibited characteristic symptoms of intestinal stress, such as irritability, aggression, and diarrhea, which intensified with the prolonged emodin administration. Given the observed variations in these external behaviors, it is imperative to closely examine the internal changes in the mice at the conclusion of the experiment. For instance, the
留言 (0)