Fungal keratitis caused by Neurospora: a case report

Introduction

Fungal keratitis is an infectious corneal disease caused by pathogenic fungi. Severe infection can lead to endophthalmitis or require corneal transplantation to restore vision. Although bacterial keratitis is more common than fungal keratitis, the latter have a poor prognosis, due to the lack of effective therapeutic drugs and methods of treatment, and also because fungi differ from other pathogens in their pathogenesis (1). At least 166 genera and 144 species of fungi have been reported to cause human fungal keratitis, including over 100 genera of filamentous fungi, 18 genera of yeasts or yeast-like fungi, and six genera of dimorphic fungi (2). The common pathogenic fungi causing keratitis are Aspergillus, Fusarium, Candida, Curvularia, and Penicillium, among which Fusarium and Aspergillus are the most common. The prevalence of fungal keratitis may vary greatly in terms of geographical location and climatic conditions. In China, the pathogens of fungal keratitis are mainly Fusarium, Aspergillus, and Alternaria (3, 4). Here, we report a case of Neurospora infection. Neurospora is the genus of a group of filamentous fungi, with N. crassa most often the best studied species, which has served as a model eukaryotic organism for nearly a century (5). To the best of our knowledge, there are eight previously published cases of Neurospora infection listed in PubMed. These case reports suggested that Neurospora primarily caused co-infections in immunocompromised patients with underlying diseases, or occupational asthma in healthy people. In China, there has been no report of fungal keratitis caused by Neurospora until the present report.

Case presentation

A 40-year-old Mongoloid male presented in our outpatient clinic with painful swelling of the left eye and redness, which was experienced for a week. One week earlier, after he was cut by a tree branch, the patient developed a swelling and pain in the left eye, accompanied by redness, but no obvious eye pain, photophobia, tearing, dizziness, headache, nausea, vomiting, or other discomfort. He was in good spirits, had a good appetite, slept well, had normal urine and stools, and had experienced no significant weight loss during his illness. The patient had type 2 diabetes mellitus for 5 years, was taking oral hypoglycemic drugs regularly, and claimed to have good blood glucose control. His visual acuity was 0.6, and his intraocular pressure was normal in the left eye. Slit-lamp examination revealed a cloudy, white, oval lesion with an indistinct margin and a dull surface on the temporal side of the left cornea. Pus was faintly visible in the anterior chamber below (Figure 1). A glaucoma drainage tube was observed at the 11 o’clock position in the anterior chamber, and the conjunctival filtering vesicles were flattened. Other details were unclear.

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Slit-lamp photograph of left eye before treatment.

The patient was diagnosed with a corneal ulcer on the left side of the eye and was treated with levofloxacin eye drops and levofloxacin ophthalmic gel. However, he did not respond to this treatment. Therefore, we suspected that the patient had fungal keratitis, so he was admitted to our hospital for further treatment.

After admission, the patient’s corneal surface was anesthetized and a specimen was scraped from the edge of the ulcerous corneal lesion. This was sent for microscopic evaluation and prolonged culture. A smear of corneal scrapings was stained for calcium fluorescence, and a few mycelium and columnar spores were seen using a microscope (Figure 2), while other scrapings were directly inoculated into Sabouraud glucose agar, and incubated at 37°C. After hyphae were detected, the patient was given topical fluconazole (FCZ) (0.2 g/100 mL) drops once every hour, and itraconazole (ICZ) (200 mg) was orally administered once a day. Meanwhile, we noticed a significant increase in his blood glucose, so we injected “Insulin Degludec and Insulin Aspart Injection” subcutaneously to control blood glucose levels. Two days later, small white colonies were cultured from his corneal scrapings by the hospital’s Mycology Department (Figures 3 and 4), apparently indicating a single fungus species. To exclude false positives due to contamination, repeated cultures from the edge of the ulcerous corneal lesion on a different occasion were conducted after mycelium were found in the direct smear of the corneal scraping, with the same white colonies being again cultured.

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Mycelium could be seen with calcofluor white staining (original magnification, ×400).

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Colonies morphology of SDA medium cultured at 37℃ for 2 days.

To further identify the pathogen, tissue cultures was sent for internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region amplification. The ITS region was amplified using primers: ITS1-F (5’-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4-R (5’-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′). The cycling conditions were 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 90 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. Finally, it was identified as Neurospora using a DNA sequencing analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) gene at Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).

During the treatment period, the patient’s condition was stable, so we continued topical and systemic antifungal and glycemic control symptomatic supportive therapy. After treatment for 5 days, the patient’s corneal abscess regressed with minimal haze and his visual acuity was still 0.6. Therefore, he was discharged from the hospital and the antifungal medications were continued. During telephone follow-ups over the next 3 months, there was no sign of recurrence of keratitis.

www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Columnar spore visible. Lactophenol cotton blue (original magnification, ×400).

Discussion

Fungal infections rarely occur in healthy corneas, but plant trauma and contact lens usage are considered major risk factors. Over the past two decades, the increased incidence of fungal keratitis has been suggested to be related to the widespread abuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants (3, 6). Neurospora is an Ascomycete fungus and is widely distributed in soil and graminaceous plants. It was first found in 1843 as a contaminant in French bakeries, so it was also called “red-bread mold.” Neurospora is often considered a contaminant and commonly used in numerous eukaryotic cell biology studies (7). It has been implicated in peritonitis, eye infection, oral cavity infection, and occupational asthma (8). In patients with trauma or burns, prominent risk factors for Neurospora infection include incorrect steroid usage and diabetes (9). In the present case, the patient was cut by a tree branch and suffered from type 2 diabetes mellitus for 5 years. Despite the usual regular use of hypoglycemic drugs, a significant increase in blood glucose was found during hospitalization, which increased the likelihood of fungal infection with Neurospora species, which is normally considered non-pathogenic to humans. Neurospora is usually encountered as a contaminant, because of its rapidity of growth (10). In this case, repeated cultures from the edge of the ulcerous corneal lesion on two different occasions with concurrent symptoms made this highly improbable.

Early and rapid identification of pathogenic organisms is key to ensuring successful treatment of corneal infections, especially fungal infections of the cornea. The initial clinical diagnosis of fungal keratitis is usually based on major predisposing factors such as plant trauma, contact lens use, and prolonged use of topical/systemic antibiotics or corticosteroids, and the typical clinical manifestations are endothelial plaques, white infiltrates, hypopyon, satellite-like lesions, feathery margins, and corneal ulcers with toothpaste-like surfaces (11). Culture of corneal scrapes is the preferred initial test to identify the infecting organism. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) can complement the diagnosis (12). Corneal smears and cultures are traditional tests used in the diagnosis of fungal keratitis. Fungal cultures are the gold standard, but they require long incubation times, usually at least 2–3 days, and speciation is sometimes difficult. Calcofluor White staining of corneal smears is a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for the diagnosis of fungal keratitis, but its sensitivity and specificity are still limited by the method itself. IVCM and PCR can improve diagnostic accuracy, but IVCM requires expensive equipment and trained, experienced operators to perform the technique. Regarding PCR, in addition to the limitations described above, contamination from the environment and commensals can result in a false positive result (1315). For this rare fungal infection, traditional smears, as well as culture and morphology-based fungal identification, do not always provide enough resolution for identifying fungal species, and under these conditions, molecular detection would perform well in distinguishing Neurospora from other common keratitis-causing fungi.

There are many challenges in treating fungal keratitis. Two major problems in the treatment of fungal keratitis are the lack of laboratory diagnostic tools to determine drug sensitivity and poor ocular penetration, resulting in low drug bioavailability. Fungal keratitis is treated primarily with topical medications. For deep and refractory keratitis, intrastromal and intracameral injections are more effective. Amphotericin B (AMB), natamycin (NTM), and voriconazole (VCZ) are the only topical antifungal drugs currently used, with sufficient data indicating their efficacies, safety, and clinical indications (16). NTM is the usual first-line drug of choice for filamentous fungal keratitis. VCZ has also been reported to be effective against a broad spectrum of fungi, especially for non-Fusarium infections and when keratitis is caused by rare pathogens (17). For natamycin-resistant cases, AMB can be used to treat filamentous fungi, but penetration is poor and toxicity is high (18). In addition to topical medications, several clinical and experimental studies have reported favorable results with systemic azoles including ketoconazole, ICZ, and FCZ (19). However, there is no standard treatment protocol for Neurospora. Hood et al. (10) described a successful outcome with complete resolution of the infection in 4 months using FCZ (200 mg daily). In the present case, we used FCZ (0.2 g/100 mL) as eye drops once every hour and ICZ (200 mg daily) as a systemic antifungal to treat the patient. As a result, fungal keratitis caused by Neurospora was ameliorated.

Conclusion

We reported the case of a patient who developed fungal keratitis after being cut by a tree branch. When the patient was diagnosed with fungal keratitis, we immediately started medical treatment. After Neurospora was identified, treatment of the patient, who responded to topical FCZ and systemic ICZ treatment, was continued, and the patient’s condition improved significantly after 5 days of treatment. We suggest that medical treatment should be started immediately in patients diagnosed with fungal keratitis, and the treatment plan should be adjusted according to the subsequent experimental results and the patient’s condition. We also aimed to increase awareness of medical workers to rare cases of fungal keratitis, and we have provided protocols for the diagnosis and treatment of fungal keratitis caused by Neurospora.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/supplementary material.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Ningbo First Hospital of Ningbo University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

YL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. YM: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YW: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. XL: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Zhejiang Province Basic Public Welfare Research Program Project (LGC21H200002).

Acknowledgments

We thank International Science Editing (http://www.internationalscienceediting.com) for editing this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Donovan, C, Arenas, E, Ayyala, RS, Margo, CE, and Espana, EM. Fungal keratitis: mechanisms of infection and management strategies. Surv Ophthalmol. (2022) 67:758–69. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.08.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Mills, B, Radhakrishnan, N, Karthikeyan Rajapandian, SG, Rameshkumar, G, Lalitha, P, and Prajna, NV. The role of fungi in fungal keratitis. Exp Eye Res. (2021) 202:108372. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108372

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Lin, Y, Zhang, J, Han, X, and Hu, J. A retrospective study of the spectrum of fungal keratitis in southeastern China. Ann Palliat Med. (2021) 10:9480–7. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-1949

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Wang, L, Sun, S, Jing, Y, Han, L, Zhang, H, and Yue, J. Spectrum of fungal keratitis in Central China. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. (2009) 37:763–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02155.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Ahmadikia, K, Aghaei Gharehbolagh, S, Fallah, B, Naeimi Eshkaleti, M, Malekifar, P, Rahsepar, S, et al. Distribution, prevalence, and causative agents of fungal keratitis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis (1990 to 2020). Front Cell Infect Microbiol. (2021) 11:698780. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.698780

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Roche, CM, Loros, JJ, McCluskey, K, and Glass, NL. Neurospora crassa: looking back and looking forward at a model microbe. Am J Bot. (2014) 101:2022–35. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400377

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Patil, R, Ajagunde, J, Khan, S, Kannuri, S, Gandham, N, and Mukhida, S. Rhino-orbital cerebral mycosis: a case series of non-mucorales in COVID patients. Access Microbiol. (2023) 5:1–19. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000575.v4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Petrikkos, G, Skiada, A, Lortholary, O, Roilides, E, Walsh, TJ, and Kontoyiannis, DP. Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. (2012) 54:S23–34. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir866

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Hoffman, JJ, Dart, JKG, De, SK, Carnt, N, Cleary, G, and Hau, S. Comparison of culture, confocal microscopy and PCR in routine hospital use for microbial keratitis diagnosis. Eye (Lond). (2022) 36:2172–8. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01812-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zhang, W, Yang, H, Jiang, L, Han, L, and Wang, L. Use of potassium hydroxide, Giemsa and calcofluor white staining techniques in the microscopic evaluation of corneal scrapings for diagnosis of fungal keratitis. J Int Med Res. (2010) 38:1961–7. doi: 10.1177/147323001003800609

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Sahay, P, Singhal, D, Nagpal, R, Maharana, PK, Farid, M, Gelman, R, et al. Pharmacologic therapy of mycotic keratitis. Surv Ophthalmol. (2019) 64:380–400. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.02.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Niu, L, Liu, X, Ma, Z, Yin, Y, Sun, L, Yang, L, et al. Fungal keratitis: pathogenesis, diagnosis and prevention. Microb Pathog. (2020) 138:103802. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103802

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Maharana, PK, Sharma, N, Nagpal, R, Jhanji, V, Das, S, and Vajpayee, RB. Recent advances in diagnosis and management of Mycotic keratitis. Indian J Ophthalmol. (2016) 64:346–57. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.185592

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif