Zhang Y, Zhang W, Wu X, Liu G, Dai Y, Jiang H, Zhang X. Effect of varicocele on sperm DNA damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrologia. 2022;54(1):e14275.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pajovic B, Radojevic N, Dimitrovski A, Radovic M, Rolovic R, Vukovic M. Advantages of microsurgical varicocelectomy over conventional techniques. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(4):532–8.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioğlu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl. 2009;30(1):33–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Demirdöğen ŞO, Özkaya F, Cinislioğlu AE, Altay MS, Adanur Ş, Polat Ö, Özbey İ. A comparison between the efficacy and safety of microscopic inguinal and subinguinal varicocelectomy. Turkish J Urol. 2019;45(4):254–60.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sharma S, Shimpi RK. Estimation of haemodynamic changes in varicocele testis and results after microsurgical sub-inguinal varicocelectomy. Urologia 2021:3915603211069013.

Ding H, Tian J, Du W, Zhang L, Wang H, Wang Z. Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJU Int. 2012;110(10):1536–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1970;21(8):606–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hou Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Huo W, Li H. Comparison between Microsurgical Subinguinal Varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery for infertile men: is testicular delivery an unnecessary Procedure. Urol J. 2015;12(4):2261–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Akkoç A, Aydın C, Topaktaş R, Altın S, Uçar M, Topçuoğlu M, Buğra Şentürk A. Retroperitoneal high ligation versus subinguinal varicocelectomy: effectiveness of two different varicocelectomy techniques on the treatment of painful varicocele. Andrologia. 2019;51(7):e13293.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Johnson D, Sandlow J. Treatment of varicoceles: techniques and outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):378–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hopps CV, Lemer ML, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach. J Urol. 2003;170(6 Pt 1):2366–70.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al-Kandari AM, Khudair A, Arafa A, Zanaty F, Ezz A, El-Shazly M. Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in 100 consecutive cases: spermatic cord vascular anatomy, recurrence and hydrocele outcome analysis. Arab J Urol. 2018;16(1):181–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee JK, Ryu HY, Paick JS, Kim SW. Anatomical factors affecting the time required for microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1031.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kang DH, Lee JY, Chung JH, Jo JK, Lee SH, Ham WS, Cho KS, Lee KS, Kim TH, Lee SW. Laparoendoscopic single site varicocele ligation: comparison of testicular artery and lymphatic preservation versus complete testicular vessel ligation. J Urol. 2013;189(1):243–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang GX, Yang J, Long DZ, Liu M, Zou XF, Yuan YH, Xiao RH, Xue YJ, Zhong X, Liu QL, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of transumbilical two-port laparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic varicocele ligation. Asian J Androl. 2017;19(1):34–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Penn I, Mackie G, Halgrimson CG, Starzl TE. Testicular complications following renal transplantation. Ann Surg. 1972;176(6):697–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Borruto FA, Impellizzeri P, Antonuccio P, Finocchiaro A, Scalfari G, Arena F, Esposito C, Romeo C. Laparoscopic vs open varicocelectomy in children and adolescents: review of the recent literature and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(12):2464–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, Dohle G, Jarvi K, Salonia A, Weidner W, Zini A. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. Eur Urol. 2011;60(4):796–808.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chiba K, Fujisawa M. Clinical Outcomes of Varicocele Repair in Infertile men: a review. World J Mens Health. 2016;34(2):101–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Almekaty K, Zahran MH, Zoeir A, Minhas S, Salem K. The role of artery-preserving varicocelectomy in subfertile men with severe oligozoospermia: a randomized controlled study. Andrology. 2019;7(2):193–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

MacMahon RA, O’Brien MC, Cussen LJ. The use of microsurgery in the treatment of the undescended testis. J Pediatr Surg. 1976;11(4):521–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bryniarski P, Taborowski P, Rajwa P, Kaletka Z, Życzkowski M, Paradysz A. The comparison of laparoscopic and microsurgical varicocoelectomy in infertile men with varicocoele on paternity rate 12 months after surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Andrology. 2017;5(3):445–50.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Salem HK, Mostafa T. Preserved testicular artery at varicocele repair. Andrologia. 2009;41(4):241–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lynch WJ, Badenoch DF, McAnena OJ. Comparison of laparoscopic and open ligation of the testicular vein. Br J Urol. 1993;72(5 Pt 2):796–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raman JD, Goldstein M. Intraoperative characterization of arterial vasculature in spermatic cord. Urology. 2004;64(3):561–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lv KL, Zhuang JT, Zhao L, Wan Z, Zhang YD, Gao Y, Sun XZ, Qiu SP, Deng CH, Tu XA. Varicocele anatomy during subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy in Chinese men. Andrologia. 2015;47(10):1190–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ramírez Calazans A, Ibarra Rodríguez MR, Wiesner Torres SR, Garrido Pérez JI, Vázquez Rueda F, Paredes Esteban RM. Comparing two vascular division techniques in laparoscopic varicocelectomy. A prospective study. Cir Pediatrica: organo oficial de la Sociedad Esp De Cir Pediatrica. 2024;37(2):75–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Benzi TC, Logsdon NT, Sampaio FJB, Favorito LA. Testicular arteries anatomy applied to fowler-sthephens surgery in high undescended testis - a narrative review. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48(1):8–17.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Micali S, Ghaith A, Martorana E, Zordani A, Territo A, Bianchi G. Bilateral spermatic cord en bloc ligation by laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: preliminary experience compared to conventional laparoscopy. BMC Urol. 2014;14:83.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kattan S. The impact of internal spermatic artery ligation during laparoscopic varicocelectomy on recurrence rate and short post operative outcome. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2001;35(3):218–21.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barqawi A, Furness P 3rd, Koyle M. Laparoscopic palomo varicocelectomy in the adolescent is safe after previous ipsilateral inguinal surgery. BJU Int. 2002;89(3):269–72.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Qi X, Wang K, Zhou G, Xu Z, Yu J, Zhang W. The role of testicular artery in laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(6):955–65.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rizkala E, Fishman A, Gitlin J, Zelkovic P, Franco I. Long term outcomes of lymphatic sparing laparoscopic varicocelectomy. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(4):458–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang WC, Huang CP, Lai CM, Ku FY, Hsu HN, Yang CT, Wang YY, Laih CY. Increased intraoperative vein ligation in microsurgical varicocelectomy is associated with pain improvement. Medicine. 2023;102(38):e35170.

Article