Clarke AC, Chiragakis L, Hillman LC, Kaye GL. Sedation for endoscopy: the safe use of propofol by general practitioner sedationists. Med J Aust 2002; 176: 158–61. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04345.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jirapinyo P, Thompson CC. Sedation challenges: obesity and sleep apnea. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2016; 26: 527–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2016.03.001

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ng A, Smith G. Gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration of gastric contents in anesthetic practice. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 494–513. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200108000-00050

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Warner MA, Warner ME, Weber JG. Clinical significance of pulmonary aspiration during the perioperative period. Anesthesiology 1993; 78: 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199301000-00010

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bohman JK, Jacob AK, Nelsen KA, et al. Incidence of gastric-to-pulmonary aspiration in patients undergoing elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 1163–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.024

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Correa CS, Bagatini A, Prates CG, Sander GB. Patient safety in an endoscopy unit: an observational retrospective analysis of reported incidents. Braz J Anesthesiol 2021; 71: 137–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.023

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Green SM, Mason KP, Krauss BS. Pulmonary aspiration during procedural sedation: a comprehensive systematic review. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118: 344–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex004

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

American Society of Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration. Anesthesiology 2017; 126: 376–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000001452

Article  Google Scholar 

Chang JE, Kim H, Won D, et al. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content in fasted patients before elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective observational single-cohort study. Can J Anaesth 2020; 67: 810–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01668-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bisinotto FMB; Silveira LAM; Martin LB. Pulmonary aspiration in anesthesia: review. Rev Méd Minas Gerais 2014; 24: S56–66. https://doi.org/10.5935/2238-3182.20140128

Article  Google Scholar 

Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 749–57. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra0909487

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li L, Yong RJ, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Perioperative point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for anesthesiologists: an overview. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2020; 24: 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-020-0847-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van de Putte P, Vernieuwe L, Jerjir A, Verschueren L, Tacken M, Perlas A. When fasted is not empty: a retrospective cohort study of gastric content in fasted surgical patients†. Br J Anaesth 2017; 118: 363–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew435

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dewar ZE, Wu J, Hughes H, et al. A comparison of handheld ultrasound versus traditional ultrasound for acquisition of RUSH views in healthy volunteers. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2020; 1: 1320–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12322

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rykkje A, Carlsen JF, Nielsen MB. Hand-held ultrasound devices compared with high-end ultrasound systems: a systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2019; 9: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics9020061

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Malik AN, Rowland J, Haber BD, et al. The use of handheld ultrasound devices in emergency medicine. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep 2021; 9: 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40138-021-00229-6

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

European Society of Radiology (ESR). ESR statement on portable ultrasound devices. Insights Imaging 2019; 10: 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0775-x

Article  Google Scholar 

Segura-Grau E, Segura-Grau A, Ara Jo R, Payeras G, Cabral J, Afreixo V. Reinforcing the valuable role of gastric ultrasound for volume and content assessment: an observational study. Braz J Anesthesiol 2022; 72: 749–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.07.008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Perlas A, Mitsakakis N, Liu L, et al. Validation of a mathematical model for ultrasound assessment of gastric volume by gastroscopic examination. Anesth Analg 2013; 116: 357–63. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318274fc19

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abramson JH. WINPEPI updated: computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2011; 8: 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5573-8-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Perlas A, Chan VW, Lupu CM, Mitsakakis N, Hanbidge A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume. Anesthesiology 2009; 111: 82–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e3181a97250

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Phillips S, Liang SS, Formaz-Preston A, Stewart PA. High-risk residual gastric content in fasted patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective cohort study of prevalence and predictors. Anaesth Intensive Care 2015; 43: 728–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x1504300610

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schol J, Wauters L, Dickman R, et al. United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) consensus on gastroparesis. United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 9: 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12060

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nassar Y, Richter S. Gastroparesis in non-diabetics: associated conditions and possible risk factors. Gastroenterology Res 2018; 11: 340–5. https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1060w

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hasler WL. Gastroparesis—current concepts and considerations. Medscape J Med 2008; 10: 16. Available from URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2258461/ (accessed August 2024).

Silveira SQ, da Silva LM, de Campos Vieira Abib A, et al. Relationship between perioperative semaglutide use and residual gastric content: a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy. J Clin Anesth 2023; 87: 111091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111091

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kobori T, Onishi Y, Yoshida Y, et al. Association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment with gastric residue in an esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Diabetes Investig 2023; 14: 767–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.14005

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wu F, Smith MR, Mueller AL, et al. Association of glucagon-like peptide receptor 1 agonist therapy with the presence of gastric contents in fasting patients undergoing endoscopy under anesthesia care: a historical cohort study. Can J Anesth 2024: 71, 958–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02719-z

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Klein SR, Hobai IA. Semaglutide, delayed gastric emptying, and intraoperative pulmonary aspiration: a case report. Can J Anesth 2023; 70: 1394–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02440-3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gulak MA, Murphy P. Regurgitation under anesthesia in a fasted patient prescribed semaglutide for weight loss: a case report. Can J Anesth 2023; 70: 1397–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-023-02521-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Milne AD, Berry MA, Ellis MW, et al. Rates of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and aspiration events associated with anesthesia at a Canadian academic teaching centre. Can J Anesth 2024: 71, 673–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02761-x