Echavarria-Pinto M, Escaned J, Macias E, Medina M, Gonzalo N, Petraco R et al (2013) <ArticleTitle Language=“En”>Disturbed coronary hemodynamics in vessels with intermediate stenoses evaluated with fractional flow reserve: a combined analysis of epicardial and microcirculatory involvement in ischemic heart disease. Circulation 128(24):2557–2566

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HV et al (2010) Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N Engl J Med 362(10):886–895

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Crea F, Bairey Merz CN, Beltrame JF, Berry C, Camici PG, Kaski JC et al (2019) Mechanisms and diagnostic evaluation of persistent or recurrent angina following percutaneous coronary revascularization. Eur Heart J 40(29):2455–2462

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C et al (2020) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 41(3):407–477

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van’ t Veer M et al (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360(3):213–224

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ford TJ, Stanley B, Good R, Rocchiccioli P, McEntegart M, Watkins S et al (2018) Stratified Medical Therapy Using Invasive Coronary Function Testing in Angina: The CorMicA Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 72(23 Pt A):2841–2855

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Song L, Xu B, Tu S, Guan C, Jin Z, Yu B et al (2022) 2-Year Outcomes of Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Coronary Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 80(22):2089–2101

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Diemen PA, Driessen RS, Kooistra RA, Stuijfzand WJ, Raijmakers PG, Boellaard R et al (2020) Comparison Between the Performance of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Perfusion Imaging for Diagnosing Myocardial Ischemia. JACC Cardiovasc imaging 13(9):1976–1985

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Maria GL, Scarsini R, Shanmuganathan M, Kotronias RA, Terentes-Printzios D, Borlotti A et al (2020) Angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance as a novel, pressure-wire-free tool to assess coronary microcirculation in ST elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 36(8):1395–1406

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mejia-Renteria H, Lee JM, Choi KH, Lee SH, Wang L, Kakuta T et al (2021) Coronary microcirculation assessment using functional angiography: Development of a wire-free method applicable to conventional coronary angiograms. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 98(6):1027–1037

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Driessen RS, Leipsic J, Raju R, Naoum C et al (2017) Comparison of Coronary CT Angiography, SPECT, PET, and Hybrid Imaging for Diagnosis of Ischemic Heart Disease Determined by Fractional Flow Reserve. JAMA Cardiol 2(10):1100–1107

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Driessen RS, van Diemen PA, Raijmakers PG, Knuuti J, Maaniitty T, Underwood SR et al (2022) Functional stress imaging to predict abnormal coronary fractional flow reserve: the PACIFIC 2 study. Eur Heart J

Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Harms HJ, Heymans MW, van Royen N, Lubberink M et al (2014) Impact of anatomical and functional severity of coronary atherosclerotic plaques on the transmural perfusion gradient: a [15O]H2O PET study. Eur Heart J 35(31):2094–2105

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart - A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 105(4):539–542

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Danad I, Uusitalo V, Kero T, Saraste A, Raijmakers PG, Lammertsma AA et al (2014) Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(14):1464–1475

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bom MJ, van Diemen PA, Driessen RS, Everaars H, Schumacher SP, Wijmenga JT et al (2020) Prognostic value of [15O]H2O positron emission tomography-derived global and regional myocardial perfusion. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 21(7):777–786

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Diemen PA, de Winter RW, Schumacher SP, Everaars H, Bom MJ, Jukema RA et al (2023) The Diagnostic Performance of QFR and Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Disease. European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging

Fearon WF, Kobayashi Y (2017) Invasive Assessment of the Coronary Microvasculature: The Index of Microcirculatory Resistance. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. ;10(12)

Williams RP, de Waard GA, De Silva K, Lumley M, Asrress K, Arri S et al (2018) Doppler Versus Thermodilution-Derived Coronary Microvascular Resistance to Predict Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction or Stable Angina Pectoris. Am J Cardiol 121(1):1–8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Pecoraro A, Fineschi M, Campo G (2016) Fractional flow reserve implementation in daily clinical practice: A European survey. Int J Cardiol 207:206–207

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mejía-Rentería H, Wang L, Chipayo-Gonzales D, van de Hoef TP, Travieso A, Espejo C et al (2022) Angiography-derived assessment of coronary microcirculatory resistance in patients with suspected myocardial ischaemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries. EuroIntervention

Echavarría-Pinto M, van de Hoef TP, Nijjer S, Gonzalo N, Nombela-Franco L, Ibañez B et al (2017) Influence of the amount of myocardium subtended to a coronary stenosis on the index of microcirculatory resistance. Implications for the invasive assessment of microcirculatory function in ischaemic heart disease. EuroIntervention 13(8):944–952

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Yap JT, Rimoldi O, Camici PG (1999) Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 15O-labeled water and PET. J Nucl Med 40(11):1848–1856

PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Aarnoudse W, Fearon WF, Manoharan G, Geven M, van de Vosse F, Rutten M et al (2004) Epicardial stenosis severity does not affect minimal microcirculatory resistance. Circulation 110(15):2137–2142

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yong AS, Ho M, Shah MG, Ng MK, Fearon WF (2012) Coronary microcirculatory resistance is independent of epicardial stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 5(1):103–108 s1-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Everaars H, de Waard GA, Driessen RS, Danad I, van de Ven PM, Raijmakers PG et al (2018) Doppler Flow Velocity and Thermodilution to Assess Coronary Flow Reserve: A Head-to-Head Comparison With [(15)O]H(2)O PET. JACC Cardiovasc interventions 11(20):2044–2054

Article  Google Scholar 

Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL (1993) Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 87(4):1354–1367

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

van de Hoef TP, Nolte F, EchavarrÍa-Pinto M, van Lavieren MA, Damman P, Chamuleau SA et al (2014) Impact of hyperaemic microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from combined stenosis and microvascular resistance assessment. Heart 100(12):951–959

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fearon WF, Aarnoudse W, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Balsam LB, Cooke DT et al (2004) Microvascular resistance is not influenced by epicardial coronary artery stenosis severity: experimental validation. Circulation 109(19):2269–2272

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Driessen RS, Raijmakers PG, Stuijfzand WJ, Knaapen P (2017) Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(7):1021–1031

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bom MJ, Schumacher SP, Driessen RS, Raijmakers PG, Everaars H, van Diemen PA et al (2019) Impact of individualized segmentation on diagnostic performance of quantitative positron emission tomography for haemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 20(5):525–532

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar