Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB (2020) Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open 3(1):e1918911
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Alemzadeh H, Raman J, Leveson N, Kalbarczyk Z, Iyer RK (2016) Adverse events in robotic surgery: a retrospective study of 14 years of FDA data. PLoS ONE 11:e0151470
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M (2011) From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology. BJU Int 108(11):1708–1713
Boal M, Di Girasole CG, Tesfai F, Morrison TEM, Higgs S, Ahmad J, Arezzo A, Francis N (2024) Evaluation status of current and emerging minimally invasive robotic surgical platforms. Surg Endosc 38(2):554–585
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dalager T, Jensen PT, Eriksen JR, Jakobsen HL, Mogensen O, Søgaard K (2020) Surgeons’ posture and muscle strain during laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Br J Surg 107(6):756–766
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gall TMH, Malhotra G, Elliott JA, Conneely JB, Fong Y, Jiao LR (2023) The Atlantic divide: contrasting surgical robotics training in the USA, UK and Ireland. J Robot Surg 17(1):117–123
Lee GI, Lee MR, Clanton T, Sutton E, Park AE, Marohn MR (2014) Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries. Surg Endosc 28(2):456–465
Pietersen PI, Hertz P, Olsen RG, Møller LB, Konge L, Bjerrum F (2023) Transfer of skills between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 37(12):9030–9042
Veronesi G, Dorn P, Dunning J, Cardillo G, Schmid RA, Collins J et al (2018) Outcomes from the Delphi process of the thoracic robotic curriculum development committee. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-Thorac Surg 53(6):1173–1179
Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D (2018) Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 32(4):1636–55
Kowalewski KF, Schmidt MW, Proctor T, Pohl M, Wennberg E, Karadza E et al (2018) Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study. Surg Endosc 32(4):1656–1667
Gillespie BM, Gillespie J, Boorman RJ, Granqvist K, Stranne J, Erichsen-Andersson A (2021) The impact of robotic-assisted surgery on team performance: a systematic mixed studies review. Hum Factors 63(8):1352–1379
Boal MWE, Afzal A, Gorard J, Shah A, Tesfai F, Ghamrawi W, Tutton M, Ahmad J, Selvasekar C, Khan J, Francis NK (2024) Development and evaluation of a societal core robotic surgery accreditation curriculum for the UK. J Robot Surg 18(1):305
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Finnegan KT, Meraney AM, Staff I, Shichman SJ (2012) da Vinci skills simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance. Urology 80(2):330–335
Kelly DC, Margules AC, Kundavaram CR, Narins H, Gomella LG, Trabulsi EJ et al (2012) Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci skills simulator. Urology 79(5):1068–1072
Liu M, Curet M (2015) A review of training research and virtual reality simulators for the da Vinci surgical system. Teach Learn Med 27(1):12–26
Rajanbabu A, Drudi L, Lau S, Press JZ, Gotlieb WH (2014) Virtual reality surgical simulators—a prerequisite for robotic surgery. Indian J Surg Oncol 5(2):125–127
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ben-Or S, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR (2013) Robotic surgical training. Cancer J Sudbury Mass 19(2):120–123
European Association of Urology (n.d.) ERUS robotic curriculum. https://uroweb.org/section/erus/education/
Satava RM, Stefanidis D, Levy JS, Smith R, Martin JR, Monfared S et al (2020) Proving the effectiveness of the fundamentals of robotic surgery (FRS) skills curriculum: a single-blinded, multispecialty, multi-institutional randomized control trial. Ann Surg 272(2):384–392
Stegemann AP, Ahmed K, Syed JR, Rehman S, Ghani K, Autorino R et al (2013) Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology 81(4):767–774
Carpenter BT, Sundaram CP (2017) Training the next generation of surgeons in robotic surgery. Robot Surg Auckl 4:39–44
Fadel MG, Walshaw J, Pecchini F, Elhadi M, Yiasemidou M, Boal M et al (2024) European Robotic Surgery Consensus (ERSC): protocol for the development of a consensus in robotic training for gastrointestinal surgery trainees. PLoS ONE 19(5):e0302648
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fadel M, Walshaw J, Yiasemidou M, Boal M, Francis N, Kontovounisios C (2024) Development of a European consensus in robotic training for gastrointestinal surgery trainees. Open Science Framework Registry. https://osf.io/br87d/
Qualtrics XM software (2024)
Eysenbach G (2004) Improving the quality of Web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet e-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 6(3):e34
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Da Vinci by Intuitive (2018) Da Vinci training passport. https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/-/media/ISI/Intuitive/Pdf/training-passport-brochure-ww-1016750.pdf
Ghazi AE, Teplitz BA (2020) Role of 3D printing in surgical education for robotic urology procedures. Transl Androl Urol 9(2):931–941
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
General Surgery Simulator Kindheart (2020) Touchstone 3D. https://touchstone3d.com/general-surgery-simulator/
Jiménez-Rodríguez RM, Rubio-Dorado-Manzanares M, Díaz-Pavón JM, Reyes-Díaz ML, Vazquez-Monchul JM, Garcia-Cabrera AM et al (2016) Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: current state of affairs. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(12):1807–1815
Fleming CA, Ali O, Clements JM, Hirniak J, King M, Mohan HM et al (2022) Surgical trainee experience and opinion of robotic surgery in surgical training and vision for the future: a snapshot study of pan-specialty surgical trainees. J Robot Surg 16(5):1073–1082
Sánchez R, Rodríguez O, Rosciano J, Vegas L, Bond V, Rojas A et al (2016) Robotic surgery training: construct validity of global evaluative assessment of robotic skills (GEARS). J Robot Surg 10(3):227–231
Cairo SB, Craig W, Gutheil C, Han PKJ, Hyrkas K, Macken L et al (2019) Quantitative analysis of surgical residency reform: using case-logs to evaluate resident experience. J Surg Educ 76(1):25–35
Siddiqui NY, Galloway ML, Geller EJ, Green IC, Hur HC, Langston K et al (2014) Validity and reliability of the robotic objective structured assessment of technical skills. Obstet Gynecol 123(6):1193–1199
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Boal MWE, Anastasiou D, Tesfai F, Ghamrawi W, Mazomenos E, Curtis N et al (2024) Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review. Br J Surg 111(1):znad331
Das B, Ledesma F, Naik R, Law S, Soleimani-Nouri P, Khan OA, Mylonas G, Pai M, Ashrafian H, Spalding D, Fehervari M (2024) Development and validation of a virtual teaching method for minimally invasive surgery skills: a pilot observational study. Int J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002053
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Turner SR, Mormando J, Park BJ, Huang J (2020) Attitudes of robotic surgery educators and learners: challenges, advantages, tips and tricks of teaching and learning robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 14(3):455–461
留言 (0)