Lobbezoo DJ, van Kampen RJ, Voogd AC, et al. Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer subtypes: the hormone receptor/HER2-positive subtype is associated with the most favorable outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;141(3):507–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-013-2711-y.
Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Senkus E, et al. 5th ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 5). Ann Oncol. 2020;31(12):1623–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.09.010.
Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I, et al. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(4):425–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00613-0.
Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1738–48. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1609709.
Torres-Guzmán R, Calsina B, Hermoso A, et al. Preclinical characterization of abemaciclib in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(41):69493–507. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17778.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lallena MJ, Boehnke K, Torres R, et al. Abstract 3101: in-vitro characterization of Abemaciclib pharmacology in ER+ breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2015;75(15):3101–3101. https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.Am2015-3101.
Torres-Guzmán R, Ganado MP, Mur C, et al. Continuous treatment with abemaciclib leads to sustained and efficient inhibition of breast cancer cell proliferation. Oncotarget. 2022;13:864–75. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28249.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dickler MN, Tolaney SM, Rugo HS, et al. MONARCH 1, A Phase II study of abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor, as a single agent, in patients with refractory HR(+)/HER2(−) metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(17):5218–24. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-17-0754.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sledge GW Jr, Toi M, Neven P, et al. MONARCH 2: abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(25):2875–84. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.73.7585.
Goetz MP, Toi M, Campone M, et al. MONARCH 3: abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(32):3638–46. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.75.6155.
Toi M, Inoue K, Masuda N, et al. Abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy for East Asian patients with HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer: MONARCH 2 & 3 trials. Cancer Sci. 2021;112(6):2381–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14877.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen Y, Noma S, Taguchi Y, et al. Characteristics of interstitial lung disease in patients from post-marketing data on metastatic breast cancer patients who received abemaciclib in Japan. Breast Cancer. 2021;28(3):710–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-020-01207-8.
Inoue K, Masuda N, Iwata H, et al. Japanese subpopulation analysis of MONARCH 2: phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant for treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer. 2021;28(5):1038–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-021-01239-8.
Takahashi M, Tokunaga E, Mori J, et al. Japanese subgroup analysis of the phase 3 MONARCH 3 study of abemaciclib as initial therapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2022;29(1):174–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-021-01295-0.
Samuelsen SO. A psudolikelihood approach to analysis of nested case-control studies. Biometrika. 1997;84(2):379–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/84.2.379.
Scagnoli S, Pisegna S, Toss A, et al. Clinical impact of drug-drug interactions on abemaciclib in the real-world experience of AB-ITALY study. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2024;10(1):58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-024-00657-z.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lin W, Zeng Y, Weng L, Yang J, Zhuang W. Comparative analysis of adverse events associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors based on FDA’s adverse event reporting system: a case control pharmacovigilance study. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024;25(1):47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-024-00770-6.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Seibold MA, Wise AL, Speer MC, et al. A common MUC5B promoter polymorphism and pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(16):1503–12. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1013660.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Swigris JJ, Olson AL, Huie TJ, et al. Ethnic and racial differences in the presence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis at death. Respir Med. 2012;106(4):588–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2012.01.002.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kubo K, Azuma A, Kanazawa M, et al. Consensus statement for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced lung injuries. Respir Investig. 2013;51(4):260–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resinv.2013.09.001.
Iwasa E, Fujiyoshi Y, Kubota Y, et al. Interstitial lung disease as an adverse drug reaction in Japan: exploration of regulatory actions as a basis for high reporting. Drug Saf. 2020;43(11):1121–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-00968-7.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ushiki A, Hanaoka M. Clinical characteristics of DLI: what are the clinical features of DLI? In: Hanaoka M, Nakamura H, Aoshiba K, editors. Drug-induced lung injury. Springer: Singapore; 2018. p. 27–33.
Komada F, Nakayama Y, Takara K. Analysis of time-to-onset and onset-pattern of interstitial lung disease after the administration of monoclonal antibody agents. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2018;138(12):1587–94. https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.18-00094.
Matsumoto K, Nakao S, Hasegawa S, et al. Analysis of drug-induced interstitial lung disease using the Japanese adverse drug event report database. SAGE Open Med. 2020;8:2050312120918264. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312120918264.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Osawa M, Kudoh S, Sakai F, et al. Clinical features and risk factors of panitumumab-induced interstitial lung disease: a postmarketing all-case surveillance study. Int J Clin Oncol. 2015;20(6):1063–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0834-3.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Conte P, Ascierto PA, Patelli G, et al. Drug-induced interstitial lung disease during cancer therapies: expert opinion on diagnosis and treatment. ESMO Open. 2022;7(2):100404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100404.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Furuse J, Gemma A, Ichikawa W, Okusaka T, Seki A, Ishii T. Postmarketing surveillance study of erlotinib plus gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer in Japan: POLARIS final analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017;47(9):832–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyx075.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Johnston SRD, Harbeck N, Hegg R, et al. Abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy for the adjuvant treatment of HR+, HER2-, node-positive, high-risk, early breast cancer (monarchE). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(34):3987–98. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.20.02514.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gemma A, Kudoh S, Ando M, et al. Final safety and efficacy of erlotinib in the phase 4 POLARSTAR surveillance study of 10 708 Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 2014;105(12):1584–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12550.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nakano K, Seto A, Sasaki T, et al. Incidence and risk factors of interstitial lung disease of patients with head and neck cancer treated with cetuximab. Head Neck. 2019;41(8):2574–80.
留言 (0)