Singh M, Balmaceno-Criss M, Anderson G et al (2024) Anterior cervical discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: an epidemiological review of 433,660 Surgical patients from 2011–2021. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.02.016

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Epstein NE, Agulnick MA (2022) Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA)/total disc replacement (TDR) vs. anterior cervical diskectomy/fusion (ACDF): a review. Surg Neurol Int 13:565. https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_1028_2022

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Khalaf K, Nikkhoo M (2022) Comparative biomechanical analyses of lower cervical spine post anterior fusion versus intervertebral disc arthroplasty: a geometrically patient-specific poroelastic finite element investigation. J Orthop Translat 36:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2022.05.008

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Peng Z, Hong Y, Meng Y, Liu H (2022) A meta-analysis comparing the short- and mid- to long-term outcomes of artificial cervical disc replacement(ACDR) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease. Int Orthop 46:1609–1625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05318-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu T-K, Liu H, Ding C et al (2020) Effect of preoperative segmental range of motion on patient outcomes in cervical disc arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21:457. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03419-7

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

NUNLEY PD, CAVANAUGH DA, KERR EJ et al (2018) Heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc replacement at 7 Years—Prevalence, progression, clinical implications, and risk factors. Int J Spine Surg 12:352–361. https://doi.org/10.14444/5041

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tian W, Fan M, Liu Y et al (2016) An analysis of Paravertebral Ossification in Cervical Artificial Disc replacement: a novel classification based on computed tomography. Orthop Surg 8:440–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12286

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhou F, Ju KL, Zhao Y et al (2018) Progressive bone formation after cervical disc replacement: Minimum of 5-Year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:E163–E170. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002264

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shen Y-W, Yang Y, Liu H et al (2021) Effects of endplate coverage and intervertebral height change on heterotopic ossification following cervical disc replacement. J Orthop Surg Res 16:693. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02840-5

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kim KS, Heo DH (2016) Do postoperative biomechanical changes induce heterotopic ossification after cervical arthroplasty? A 5-Year follow-up study. Clin Spine Surg 29:E309–313. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000054

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang H, Wang X, Liu H et al (2021) Risk factors for high-Grade Heterotopic Ossification after total disc replacement: a single-center experience of 394 cases. Neurosurgery 89:852–861. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyab298

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stephens ME, O’Neal CM, Westrup AM et al (2022) Utility of machine learning algorithms in degenerative cervical and lumbar spine disease: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev 45:965–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01624-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang M, Canseco JA, Nicholson KJ et al (2020) The role of machine learning in spine surgery: the future is now. Front Surg 7:54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2020.00054

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dai Z-H (2022) Letter to the Editor concerning Artificial intelligence in predicting early-onset adjacent segment degeneration following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion by Rudisill SS, (Eur Spine J [2022]; doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07238-3). European spine journal 31:3159–3160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07354-0

McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J et al (2003) Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:384–389. https://doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200308000-00010

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

He J, Wu T, Ding C et al (2023) The fatty infiltration into cervical paraspinal muscle as a predictor of postoperative outcomes: a controlled study based on hybrid surgery. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 14:1128810. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1128810

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Han H, Wang W-Y, Mao B-H (2005) Borderline-SMOTE: a New Over-sampling Method in Imbalanced Data sets Learning. In: Huang D-S, Zhang X-P, Huang G-B (eds) Advances in Intelligent Computing. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 878–887

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Wang X, Liu H, Meng Y et al (2021) Effect of disc height and degree of distraction on heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement. World Neurosurg 145:e100–e107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.134

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Guo Q, Fang Z, Guan H et al (2020) The Effect of Footprint Mismatch on Heterotopic Ossification after cervical disk replacement. Clin Spine Surg 33:E241–E250. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000943

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zeng J, Liu H, Chen H et al (2019) Effect of prosthesis width and depth on heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44:624–628. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002915

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J et al (2005) Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery 57:759–763 discussion 759–763. https://doi.org/10.1093/neurosurgery/57.4.759

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Palissery V, Mulholland RC, McNally DS (2009) The implications of stress patterns in the vertebral body under axial support of an artificial implant. Med Eng Phys 31:833–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.03.010

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tu T-H, Wu J-C, Huang W-C et al (2011) Heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc replacement: determination by CT and effects on clinical outcomes. J Neurosurg Spine 14:457–465. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.11.SPINE10444

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu J-C, Huang W-C, Tsai H-W et al (2012) Differences between 1- and 2-level cervical arthroplasty: more heterotopic ossification in 2-level disc replacement: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 16:594–600. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.2.SPINE111066

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu J-C, Huang W-C, Tsai T-Y et al (2012) Multilevel arthroplasty for cervical spondylosis: more heterotopic ossification at 3 years of follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:E1251–1259. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318265a126

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pedersen NW, Kristensen SS, Schmidt SA et al (1989) Factors associated with heterotopic bone formation following total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 108:92–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00932162

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ahrengart L, Lindgren U (1993) Heterotopic bone after hip arthroplasty. Defining the patient at risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res 153–159

Bongetta D, Bua M, Bruno R et al (2022) Is gender a factor affecting long-term heterotopic ossification incidence after single-level cervical disc arthroplasty? World Neurosurg 165:6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ranganathan K, Loder S, Agarwal S et al (2015) Heterotopic ossification: Basic-Science principles and clinical correlates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1101–1111. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.01056

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ranganathan K, Peterson J, Agarwal S et al (2015) Role of gender in burn-Induced Heterotopic ossification and mesenchymal cell osteogenic differentiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 135:1631–1641. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001266

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Qi M, Chen H, Cao P et al (2014) Incidence and risk factors analysis of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement. Chin Med J 127:3871. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20141913

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Agusta ZP (2019) Modified balanced random forest for improving imbalanced data prediction. Int J Adv Intell Inf 5:58–65. http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.12808

Google Scholar