ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 85: Pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(3):717–29.

Google Scholar 

Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Funk MJ. Lifetime risk of stress incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201–6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Coelho SC, De Castro EB, Juliato CR. Female pelvic organ prolapse using pessaries: systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(12):1797–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-2991-y.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bugge C, Adam EJ, Gopinath D, Reid F. Pessaries (mechanical devices) for pelvic organ prolapse in women (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(2):CD004010. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub3.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cundiff GN, Amundsen CL, Bent AE, Coates KW. The PESSRI study: symptom relief outcome of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;196:405.e1–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pott-Grinstein E, Newcomer JR. Gynecologists’ patterns of prescribing pessaries. J Reprod Med. 2001;46(3):205–8.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Propst K, Mellen C, O’Sullivan DM, Tulikangas PK. Timing of office-based care. A randomized controlled trial. J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(1):100–105.

Article  Google Scholar 

Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL. Risk factors associated with an unsuccessful pessary fitting trial in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:345–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lone F, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Karamalis G. A 5 year prospective study of vaginal pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;114:56–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Singh R, Cornish A, Carey G, Al-Salihi S, Carey M. Vaginal dimensions in women with pelvic organ prolapse using vaginal cast (Abstract) – presented at IUGA (Nice) 2015.

Haylen BT, Maher C, Barber M, Camargo S, Dandolu V, et al. An International Urogynaecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse. Standardization and Terminology Committees IUGA and ICS. Joint IUGA/ICS Working Group on Female POP Terminology.

Gould FG, Carey MP, Plummer EL, Murray GL, Danielwski JA, Tabrizi SN, Garland SM. Bacterial biofilm formation on vaginal ring pessaries used for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04717-x.

Article  Google Scholar 

White HL. Maximum likelihood estimation of mis-specified models. Econometrica. 1982;50:1–25.

Article  Google Scholar 

Altman DG, Bland JM. Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates. BMJ. 2003;326:219.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL. Patient satisfaction and changes in prolapse and urinary symptoms in women who were fitted successfully with a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1025–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c869. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c869.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cheung RYK, Lee JHS, Lee LL, Chung TKH, Chna SS. Vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:73–80.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fernando RJ, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Shah SM, Jones PW. Effect of vaginal pessaries on symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:93–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Sokol ER, Jackson ND, Myers DL. Patient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 year. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:159–64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Komesu YM, Rogers RG, Rode MA, Craig EC, Gallegos KA, Montoya AR, et al. Pelvic floor symptom changes in pessary users. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:620.e1–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abdool Z, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Oliver RS. Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(3):273–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mamik MM, Rogers RG, Qualls CR, Komesu YM. Goal attainment after treatment in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(5):488.e1–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karjalainen PK, Mattsson NK, Jalkanen JT, Nieminen K, Tolppanen AM. Minimal important difference and patient acceptable symptom state for PFDI-20 and POPDI-6 in POP surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;32(12):3169–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04513-z.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Barber MD, Spino C, Janz NK, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Nager CW, et al. The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:580.e1–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jelovsek JE, Chen Z, Markland AD, Brubaker L, Dyer KY, Barber MD, et al. Minimum important differences for scales assessing symptom severity and quality of life in patients with faecal incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(6):342–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Harvie HS, Honeycutt AA, Neuwahi J, Barber MD, Richter HE, Visco AG, Sung VV, Rogers R. Responsiveness and minimally important difference of SF-6D and EQ-5D utility scores for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(3):265.e1–11.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mamik MM, Rogers RG, Qualls CR, Morrow JD. The minimum important difference for the Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:1321–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2342-9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Glavind K, Larsen T, Lindquist ASI. Sexual function in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94:80–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McKenzie DP, Thomas C. Relative risks and odds ratios: simple rules on when and how to use them. Eur J Clin Investig. 2020;20:e13249. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13249.

Article  Google Scholar