Drain A, Escobar C, Pape D. Prolapse repair in the elderly patient: contemporary trends and 30-day perioperative complications. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(10):2095–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04365-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cardenas-Trowers O, Stewart JR, Meriwether KV, Francis SL, Gupta A. Perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy based on route of concurrent hysterectomy: a secondary analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program database. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(4):953–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.08.010.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Siddiqui NY, Grimes CL, Casiano ER, Abed HT, Jeppson PC, Olivera CK, Sanses TV, Steinberg AC, South MM, Balk EM, Sung VW, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group. Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):44–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000570.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Culligan PJ, Blackwell L, Goldsmith LJ, Graham CA, Rogers A, Heit MH. A randomized controlled trial comparing fascia lata and synthetic mesh for sacral colpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(1):29–37. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000165824.62167.c1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Matthews CA. Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: how to avoid short- and long-term complications. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17(11):81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-016-0638-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clancy AA, Mallick R, Breau RH, Khalil H, Hickling DR. Complications after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant incontinence surgery: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(7):2234–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23574.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pulliam SJ, Ferzandi TR, Hota LS, Elkadry EA, Rosenblatt PL. Use of synthetic mesh in pelvic reconstructive surgery: a survey of attitudes and practice patterns of urogynecologists. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(12):1405–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0360-6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Varga M, Matia I, Kucera M, Oliverius M, Adamec M. Polypropylene mesh repair of incisional hernia after kidney transplantation: single-center experience and review of the literature. Ann Transplant. 2011;16(3):121–5. https://doi.org/10.12659/aot.882004.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, Chong V, Fabri PJ, Gibbs JO, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Irvin G 3rd, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):491–507. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199810000-00006.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Henderson WG, Daley J. Design and statistical methodology of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: why is it what it is? Am J Surg. 2009;198(5 Suppl):S19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.025.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shiloach M, Frencher SK Jr, Steeger JE, Rowell KS, Bartzokis K, Tomeh MG, Richards KE, Ko CY, Hall BL. Toward robust information: data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(1):6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.031.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

NSQIP A. ACS NSQIP. 2022. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/data-and-registries/acs-nsqip/about-acs-nsqip/. Accessed 28 June 2023.

Muller CJ, MacLehose RF. Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression: different methods correspond to different target populations. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(3):962–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu029.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dahabreh IJ, Bibbins-Domingo K. Causal inference about the effects of interventions from observational studies in medical journals. JAMA. 2024;331:1845–53.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grosz MP, Rohrer JM, Thoemmes F. The taboo against explicit causal inference in nonexperimental psychology. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020;15(5):1243–55.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

VanderWeele TJ, Rothman KJ. Formal causal models. In: Lash TL, VanderWeele TJ, Haneause S, Rothman K, editors. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2021. p. 33–51

Google Scholar 

Gerke KSaT. Risks: estimate risk ratios and risk differences using regression. 2024. https://stopsack.github.io/risks/. Accessed 07/01/2024

Blau EK, Adelstein SA, Amin KA, Durfy SJ, Lucioni A, Kobashi KC, Lee UJ. Tobacco use, immunosuppressive, chronic pain, and psychiatric conditions are prevalent in women with symptomatic mesh complications undergoing mesh removal surgery. Investig Clin Urol. 2020;61(Suppl 1):S57–63. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2020.61.S1.S57.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nassif J, Yadav GS, Orejuela FJ, Turrentine MA. Rate of mesh erosion after sacrocolpopexy with concurrent supracervical compared with total hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;140(3):412–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004901.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hill AJ, Barber MD. Apical prolapse repair: weighing the risks and benefits. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(5):373–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/gco.0000000000000203.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Halder GE, Salemi JL, Hart S, Mikhail E. Association between obesity and perioperative morbidity in open versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23(2):146–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000000382.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim EK, Applebaum JC, Kravitz ES, Hinkle SN, Koelper NC, Andy UU, Harvie HS. “Every minute counts”: association between operative time and post-operative complications for patients undergoing minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(1):263–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05412-1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raju R, Hanson KT, Habermann EB, Occhino JA, Linder BJ. Is same-day discharge following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy safe and feasible? A national contemporary database analysis. Urogynecology. 2022;28(7):414–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001178.

Article  Google Scholar