Mehrotra R, Yadav K (2022) Breast cancer in India: present scenario and the challenges ahead. World J Clin Oncol 13(3):209–218

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Jänsch A, Hacker A, Weinand S, Vogelmann T (2022) Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and me. Eur Radiol 32(4):2301–2312

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mann RM, Cho N, Moy L (2019) Breast MRI: state of the art. Radiology 292(3):520–536

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iranmakani S, Mortezazadeh T, Sajadian F, Ghaziani MF, Ghafari A, Khezerloo D, et al (2020) A review of various modalities in breast imaging: technical aspects and clinical outcomes. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00175-5

Geuzinge HA, Heijnsdijk EAM, Obdeijn IM, de Koning HJ, Tilanus-Linthorst MMA (2021) Experiences, expectations and preferences regarding MRI and mammography as breast cancer screening tools in women at familial risk. Breast 56:1–6

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jochelson MS, Lobbes MBI (2021) Contrast-enhanced mammography: state of the art. Radiology 299(1):36–48

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hannsun G, Saponaro S, Sylvan P, Elmi A (2021) Contrast-enhanced mammography: technique, indications, and review of current literature. Curr Radiol Rep 9(11):1–14

Google Scholar 

Cozzi A, Magni V, Zanardo M, Schiaffino S (2022) Contrast-enhanced mammography : a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Radiology 302(3):568–581

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ghaderi KF, Phillips J, Perry H, Lotfi P, Mehta TS (2019) Contrast-enhanced mammography: current applications and future directions. Radiographics 39(7):1907–1920

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suter MB, Pesapane F, Agazzi GM, Gagliardi T, Nigro O, Bozzini A et al (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast 53:8–17

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vourtsis A, Berg WA (2019) Breast density implications and supplemental screening. Eur Radiol 29(4):1762–1777

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nicosia L, Bozzini AC, Pesapane F, Rotili A, Marinucci I, Signorelli G et al (2023) Breast digital tomosynthesis versus contrast-enhanced mammography: comparison of diagnostic application and radiation dose in a screening setting. Cancers (Basel) 15(9):2413

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kamal R, Mansour S, Farouk A, Hanafy M, Elhatw A, Goma MM (2021) Contrast-enhanced mammography in comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: which modality is appropriate for whom? Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-021-00586-y

Yüzkan S, Cengiz D, Hekimsoy İ, Sezgin Okçu Ö, Oktay A (2021) Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced mammography: comparison with MRI and mammography. J Breast Imaging 3(4):448–454

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lobbes MBI, Smidt ML, Houwers J, Tjan-Heijnen VC, Wildberger JE (2013) Contrast enhanced mammography: techniques, current results, and potential indications. Clin Radiol 68(9):935–944

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moffa G, Galati F, Maroncelli R, Rizzo V, Cicciarelli F, Pasculli M et al (2023) Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced digital mammography versus conventional imaging in women with dense breasts. Diagnostics 13(15):2520

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Taylor DB, Burrows S, Saunders CM, Parizel PM, Ives A (2023) Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) versus MRI for breast cancer staging: detection of additional malignant lesions not seen on conventional imaging. Eur Radiol Exp 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00318-5

Girometti R, Linda A, Conte P, Lorenzon M, De Serio I, Jerman K et al (2021) Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiol Medica 126(11):1407–1414

Google Scholar 

Sudhir R, Sannapareddy K, Potlapalli A, Krishnamurthy PB, Buddha S, Koppula V (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast. Br J Radiol 94(1118):1–8

Google Scholar 

Deng CY, Juan YH, Cheung YC, Lin YC, Lo YF, Lin G, et al (2018) Quantitative analysis of enhanced malignant and benign lesions on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. Br J Radiol 91(1086). https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170605

Marzogi A, Baltzer PAT, Kapetas P, Milos RI, Bernathova M, Helbich TH et al (2023) Is the level of contrast enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) associated with the presence and biological aggressiveness of breast cancer? Diagnostics 13(4):754

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Musa K, Selçuk A, Sibel K (2024) Diagnostic value of qualitative and quantitative enhancement parameters on contrast-enhanced mammography. Diagn Interv Radiol 30(4):248–255

Google Scholar 

James JJ, Tennant SL (2018) Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM). Clin Radiol 73(8):715–723

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar