Abramowicz, J.S. 2013. Benefits and risks of ultrasound in pregnancy. Seminars in Perinatology 37(5): 295–300.
Åhman, A., K. Edvardsson, T.A. Fagerli, et al. 2019. A much valued tool that also brings ethical dilemmas—a qualitative study of Norwegian midwives’ experiences and views on the role of obstetric ultrasound. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19(1): 33.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Åhman, A., M. Persson, K. Edvardsson, et al. 2015. Two sides of the same coin—an interview study of Swedish obstetricians’ experiences using ultrasound in pregnancy management. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15: 304.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ahman, A., K. Runestam, and A. Sarkadi. 2010. Did I really want to know this? Pregnant women’s reaction to detection of a soft marker during ultrasound screening. Patient Education and Counseling 81(1): 87–93.
Alty, J., and E. Hoey. 2013. Practical ultrasound: An illustrated guide, 2nd ed. London: CRC Press.
Aune, I., and A. Möller. 2012. “I want a choice, but I don’t want to decide” - A qualitative study of pregnant women’s experiences regarding early ultrasound risk assessment for chromosomal anomalies. Midwifery 28(1): 14–23.
Bashour, H., R. Hafez and A. Abdulsalam. 2005. Syrian women’s perceptions and experiences of ultrasound screening in pregnancy: implications for antenatal policy. Reproductive Health Matters 13(25): 147–154.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T.L. and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 8th ed. Oxford University Press.
Bijma, H.H., A. van der Heide and H.I.J. Wildschut. 2008. Decision-making after ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormality. Reproductive Health Matters 16 (sup31): 82–89.
Black, R. 1992. Seeing the baby: The impact of ultrasound technology. Journal of Genetic Counseling 1(1): 45–54.
Boucher, J. 2004. Ultrasound: a window to the womb?: Obstetric ultrasound and the abortion rights debate. Journal of Medical Humanities 25(1): 7–19.
Brauer, S. 2016. Moral implications of obstetric technologies for pregnancy and motherhood. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 19(1): 45–54.
Burlbaw, J. 2004. Focusing on the issues: obstetric sonography -- that’s entertainment? Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography 20(6): 444–448.
Burrow, S. 2012. Reproductive autonomy and reproductive technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16(1): 31–44.
Charo, R.A. 2014. Physicians and the (woman’s) body politic. New England Journal of Medicine 370(3): 193–195.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chasen, S.T., and D.W. Skupski. 2003. Ethical dimensions of nuchal translucency screening. Clinics in Perinatology 30(1): 95–102.
Chervenak, F.A., and L.B. McCullough. 1989. Ethics in obstetric ultrasound. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 8(9): 493–497.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chervenak, F.A., and L.B. McCullough. 1991. Ethics, an emerging subdiscipline of obstetric ultrasound, and its relevance to the routine obstetric scan. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 1(1): 18–20.
Chervenak, F.A., and L.B. McCullough. 1996. Should sex identification be offered as part of the routine ultrasound examination? Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 8(5): 293–294.
Chervenak, F.A., and L.B. McCullough. 2005. An ethical critique of boutique fetal imaging: A case for the medicalization of fetal imaging. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192(1): 31–33.
Chervenak, F.A., L.B. McCullough, and J.L. Chervenak. 1989. Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: an indication for obstetric ultrasonography. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 161(4): 857–860.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Coles, K. 2007. Recreational scans: harmless curiosity? RCM midwives: The official journal of the Royal College of Midwives 10(8): 370–371.
Curado, J., and A. Bhide. 2018. The use of ultrasound in the antenatal diagnosis of structural abnormalities. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine 28(10): 301–307.
de Jong, A., W.J. Dondorp, S.G.M. Frints, C.E.M. de Die-Smulders and G.M.W.R. de Wert. 2011. Advances in prenatal screening: The ethical dimension. Nature Reviews Genetics 12(9): 657–663.
Donovan, S. 2006. Inescapable burden of choice? The impact of a culture of prenatal screening on women’s experiences of pregnancy. Health Sociology Review 15(4): 397–405.
Dowdy, D. 2016. Keepsake ultrasound: Taking another look. Journal of Radiology Nursing 35(2): 119–132.
Duden, B. 1993. Disembodying women: Perspectives on pregnancy and the unborn. Translated by L. Hoinacki. Harvard University Press.
Edvardsson, K., A. Åhman, T.A. Fagerli et al. 2018. Norwegian obstetricians’ experiences of the use of ultrasound in pregnancy management. A qualitative study. Sex & Reproductive Healthcare 15: 69–76.
Edvardsson, K., A. Lalos, A. Åhman, R. Small, S. Graner and I. Mogren. 2016. Increasing possibilities—Increasing dilemmas: A qualitative study of Swedish midwives’ experiences of ultrasound use in pregnancy. Midwifery 42: 46–53.
Edvardsson, K., I. Mogren, A. Lalos, M. Persson, and R. Small. 2015a. A routine tool with far-reaching influence: Australian midwives’ views on the use of ultrasound during pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 15: 195.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Edvardsson, K., R. Small, A. Lalos, M. Persson, and I. Mogren. 2015b. Ultrasound’s “window on the womb” brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians’ experiences in Australia. BMC Medical Ethics 16(1): 31.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Edvardsson, K., R. Small, M. Persson, A. Lalos, and I. Mogren. 2014. “Ultrasound is an invaluable third eye, but it can’t see everything”: A qualitative study with obstetricians in Australia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 14: 363.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Edwards, H., and N. Thomson. 2012. Social and practical implications of fetal sex determination using ultrasound. Ultrasound 20(1): 49–53.
Favaretto, M., D.F. Vears, and P. Borry. 2020. On the epistemic status of prenatal ultrasound: Are ultrasound scans photographic pictures? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45(2): 231–250.
Favre, R., V. Guige, A.S. Weingertner, et al. 2009. Is the non-respect of ethical principles by health professionals during first-trimester sonographic Down syndrome screening damaging to patient autonomy? Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 34(1): 25–32.
Frost, E.A., and A.M. Haas. 2017. Seeing and knowing the womb: A technofeminist reframing of fetal ultrasound toward a decolonization of our bodies. Computers and Composition 43(1): 88–105.
Gammeltoft, T., and H.T. Nguyen. 2007. Fetal conditions and fatal decisions: Ethical dilemmas in ultrasound screening in Vietnam. Social Science & Medicine 64(11): 2248–2259.
Getz, L., and A.L. Kirkengen. 2003. Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: Advancing technology, soft markers for fetal chromosomal aberrations, and unacknowledged ethical dilemmas. Social Science & Medicine 56(10): 2045–2057.
Giebel, H.M. 2020. Ultrasound viewers’ attribution of moral status to fetal humans: A case for presumptive rationality. Diametros 17(64): 22–35.
留言 (0)