Vandenberghe S, Mikhaylova E, D’Hoe E, Mollet P, Karp JS (2016) Recent developments in time-of-flight PET. EJNMMI Phys 3:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0138-3

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vandenberghe S, Moskal P, Karp JS (2020) State of the art in total body PET. EJNMMI Phys 7:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00290-2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Surti S (2015) Update on time-of-flight PET imaging. J Nucl Med 56:98–105. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.145029

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hutton BF, Erlandsson K, Thielemans K (2018) Advances in clinical molecular imaging instrumentation. Clin Trans Imaging 6:31–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-018-0264-0

Article  Google Scholar 

Townsend DW (2008) Positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med 38:152–166. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.01.003

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Sluis J, Boellaard R, Somasundaram A, van Snick PH, Borra RJH, Dierckx R et al (2020) Image quality and semiquantitative measurements on the Biograph Vision PET/CT system: initial experiences and comparison with the Biograph mCT. J Nucl Med 61:129–135. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.227801

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Sluis J, de Jong J, Schaar J, Noordzij W, van Snick P, Dierckx R et al (2019) Performance characteristics of the Digital Biograph Vision PET/CT system. J Nucl Med 60:1031–1036. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.215418

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alberts I, Hunermund JN, Prenosil G, Mingels C, Bohn KP, Viscione M et al (2021) Clinical performance of long axial field of view PET/CT: a head-to-head intra-individual comparison of the Biograph Vision Quadra with the Biograph Vision PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48:2395–2404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05282-7

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Slart R, Tsoumpas C, Glaudemans A, Noordzij W, Willemsen ATM, Borra RJH et al (2021) Long axial field of view PET scanners: a road map to implementation and new possibilities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 48:4236–4245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05461-6

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brouwers AH, van Sluis J, van Snick JH, Schroder CP, Baas IO, Boellaard R et al (2022) First-time imaging of [(89)Zr]trastuzumab in breast cancer using a long axial field-of-view PET/CT scanner. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 49:3593–3595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05777-x

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Viswanath V, Sari H, Pantel AR, Conti M, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Mingels C et al (2022) Abbreviated scan protocols to capture (18)F-FDG kinetics for long axial FOV PET scanners. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 49:3215–3225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05747-3

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

van Sluis J, Bellido M, Glaudemans A, Slart R (2022) Long axial field-of-view PET for ultra-low-dose imaging of non-Hodgkin lymphoma during pregnancy. Diagnostics (Basel) 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13010028.

Nienhuis PH, van Sluis J, van Snick JH, Glaudemans A, Meijering S, Brouwer E, et al. (2022) A case of clinical uncertainty solved: giant cell arteritis with polymyalgia rheumatica swiftly diagnosed with long axial field of view PET. Diagnostics (Basel) 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12112694.

van Sluis J, van Snick JH, Brouwers AH, Noordzij W, Dierckx R, Borra RJH et al (2022) Shortened duration whole body (18)F-FDG PET Patlak imaging on the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT using a population-averaged input function. EJNMMI Phys 9:74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00504-9

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

van Sluis J, van Snick JH, Brouwers AH, Noordzij W, Dierckx R, Borra RJH et al (2022) EARL compliance and imaging optimisation on the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT using phantom and clinical data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 49:4652–4660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05919-1

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Prenosil GA, Sari H, Furstner M, Afshar-Oromieh A, Shi K, Rominger A et al (2022) Performance characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view using the NEMA NU 2–2018 standard. J Nucl Med 63:476–484. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.261972

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nadig V, Herrmann K, Mottaghy FM, Schulz V (2022) Hybrid total-body pet scanners-current status and future perspectives. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 49:445–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05536-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Prenosil GA, Hentschel M, Weitzel T, Sari H, Shi K, Afshar-Oromieh A et al (2022) EARL compliance measurements on the biograph vision Quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view. EJNMMI Phys 9:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00455-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rausch I, Mannheim JG, Kupferschlager J, la Fougere C, Schmidt FP (2022) Image quality assessment along the one metre axial field-of-view of the total-body Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system for (18)F-FDG. EJNMMI Phys 9:87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00516-5

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

van Sluis J, Borra R, Tsoumpas C, van Snick JH, Roya M, Ten Hove D et al (2022) Extending the clinical capabilities of short- and long-lived positron-emitting radionuclides through high sensitivity PET/CT. Cancer Imaging 22:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-022-00507-w

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alberts I, Sari H, Mingels C, Afshar-Oromieh A, Pyka T, Shi K et al (2023) Long-axial field-of-view PET/CT: perspectives and review of a revolutionary development in nuclear medicine based on clinical experience in over 7000 patients. Cancer Imaging 23:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-023-00540-3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sachpekidis C, Pan L, Kopp-Schneider A, Weru V, Hassel JC, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A (2022) Application of the long axial field-of-view PET/CT with low-dose [(18)F]FDG in melanoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-06070-7

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W et al (2015) FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42:328–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG et al (2010) FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1297-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Panin VY, Kehren F, Rothfuss H, Hu D, Michel C, Casey ME (2006) PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements. Ieee T Nucl Sci 53:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/Tns.2005.862979

Article  Google Scholar 

Panin VY, Kehren F, Michel C, Casey M (2006) Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25:907–921. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmi.2006.876171

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boellaard R (2018) Quantitative oncology molecular analysis suite: ACCURATE. J Nucl Med 59(supplement 1):1753

Google Scholar 

Kolinger GD, Vallez Garcia D, Kramer GM, Frings V, Smit EF, de Langen AJ et al (2019) Repeatability of [(18)F]FDG PET/CT total metabolic active tumour volume and total tumour burden in NSCLC patients. EJNMMI Res 9:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-019-0481-1

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Thie JA (2004) Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage. J Nucl Med 45:1431–1434

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Adams MC, Turkington TG, Wilson JM, Wong TZ (2010) A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:310–320. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4923

Article  PubMed