Cooper LF. Biologic determinants of bone formation for osseointegration: clues for future clinical improvements. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(4):439–49.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA, Cooper LF. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In vivo studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13(1):17–29.
Stanford CM. Biomechanical and functional behavior of implants. Adv Dent Res. 1999;13:88–92.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ogawa T, Nishimura I. Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(2):200–10.
Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(Suppl 1):4–7.
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):172–84.
Funato A, Yamada M, Ogawa T. Success rate, healing time, and implant stability of photofunctionalized dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(5):1261–71.
Almassri HNS, Ma Y, Dan Z, Ting Z, Cheng Y, Wu X. Implant stability and survival rates of a hydrophilic versus a conventional sandblasted, acid-etched implant surface: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2020;151(6):444–53.
Chambrone L, Rincon-Castro MV, Poveda-Marin AE, Diazgranados-Lozano MP, Fajardo-Escolar CE, Bocanegra-Puerta MC, et al. Histological healing outcomes at the bone-titanium interface of loaded and unloaded dental implants placed in humans: a systematic review of controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2020;13(4):321–42.
Giro G, Chambrone L, Goldstein A, Rodrigues JA, Zenobio E, Feres M, et al. Impact of osteoporosis in dental implants: a systematic review. World J Orthop. 2015;6(2):311–5.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Smoking and dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(5):487–98.
Ishijima M, Ghassemi A, Soltanzadeh P, Tanaka M, Nakhaei K, Park W, et al. Effect of UV photofunctionalization on osseointegration in aged rats. Implant Dent. 2016;25(6):744–50.
Taniyama T, Saruta J, Mohammadzadeh Rezaei N, Nakhaei K, Ghassemi A, Hirota M et al. UV-photofunctionalization of titanium promotes mechanical anchorage in a rat osteoporosis model. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(4).
Sugita Y, Honda Y, Kato I, Kubo K, Maeda H, Ogawa T. Role of photofunctionalization in mitigating impaired osseointegration associated with type 2 diabetes in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(6):1293–300.
Hasegawa H, Ozawa S, Hashimoto K, Takeichi T, Ogawa T. Type 2 diabetes impairs implant osseointegration capacity in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23(2):237–46.
Ting M, Huynh BH, Woldu HG, Gamal I, Suzuki JB. Clinical impact on dental implant survival in patients taking antiresorptive medications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2023.
Oh SL, Shiau HJ, Reynolds MA. Survival of dental implants at sites after implant failure: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123(1):54–60.
Howe MS, Keys W, Richards D. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: a systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. J Dent. 2019;84:9–21.
Goyal S, Masood M, Le C, Rajendran Y, Nanjapa S, Vaderhobli R. Comparative bone graft evaluation for dental implant success: an evidence-based review. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2021;31(3):33–44.
Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Lekovic V, Beumer J 3rd, Moy PK, Lewis S. Histomorphometry of bone apposition around three types of endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992;7(4):491–6.
Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Albouy JP, Lindhe J. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(2):147–52.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
De Maeztu MA, Braceras I, Alava JI, Gay-Escoda C. Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implant surfaces modified with CO ions: a comparative histomorphometric study in beagle dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37(5):441–7.
Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 2–review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(5):544–64.
Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 1–review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(5):536–43.
Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB, Carr AB, Naert I, Wennerberg A. Quality of dental implants. Int Dent J. 2003;53(6 Suppl 2):409–43.
Lopez-Valverde N, Flores-Fraile J, Ramirez JM, Sousa BM, Herrero-Hernandez S, Lopez-Valverde A. Bioactive surfaces vs. conventional surfaces in titanium dental implants: a comparative systematic review. J Clin Med. 2020;9(7).
Chambrone L, Shibli JA, Mercurio CE, Cardoso B, Preshaw PM. Efficacy of standard (SLA) and modified sandblasted and acid-etched (SLActive) dental implants in promoting immediate and/or early occlusal loading protocols: a systematic review of prospective studies. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):359–70.
Yeo IS. Reality of dental implant surface modification: a short literature review. Open Biomed Eng J. 2014;8:114–9.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stadlinger B, Pourmand P, Locher MC, Schulz MC. Systematic review of animal models for the study of implant integration, assessing the influence of material, surface and design. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(Suppl 12):28–36.
Matos GRM. Surface roughness of dental implant and osseointegration. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021;20(1):1–4.
Boyan BD, Bonewald LF, Paschalis EP, Lohmann CH, Rosser J, Cochran DL, et al. Osteoblast-mediated mineral deposition in culture is dependent on surface microtopography. Calcif Tissue Int. 2002;71(6):519–29.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Hirt HP, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;45(2):75–83.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stafford GL. Review found little difference between sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) dental implants and modified surface (SLActive) implants. Evid Based Dent. 2014;15(3):87–8.
Saruta J, Sato N, Ishijima M, Okubo T, Hirota M, Ogawa T. Disproportionate effect of sub-micron topography on osteoconductive capability of titanium. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(16).
Att W, Tsukimura N, Suzuki T, Ogawa T. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22(5):719–28.
Takeuchi K, Saruwatari L, Nakamura HK, Yang JM, Ogawa T. Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;72A(3):296–305.
Tsukimura N, Kojima N, Kubo K, Att W, Takeuchi K, Kameyama Y, et al. The effect of superficial chemistry of titanium on osteoblastic function. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;84(1):108–16.
Ozawa S, Ogawa T, Iida K, Sukotjo C, Hasegawa H, Nishimura RD, et al. Ovariectomy hinders the early stage of bone-implant integration: histomorphometric, biomechanical, and molecular analyses. Bone. 2002;30(1):137–43.
留言 (0)