Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3(2):81–100.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hori N, Att W, Ueno T, Sato N, Yamada M, Saruwatari L, et al. Age-dependent degradation of the protein adsorption capacity of titanium. J Dent Res. 2009;88(7):663–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hori N, Ueno T, Minamikawa H, Iwasa F, Yoshino F, Kimoto K, et al. Electrostatic control of protein adsorption on UV-photofunctionalized titanium. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(10):4175–80.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kitajima H, Hirota M, Iwai T, Mitsudo K, Saruta J, Ogawa T. Synergistic enhancement of protein recruitment and retention via implant surface microtopography and superhydrophilicity in a computational fluid dynamics model. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:15618.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kitajima H, Hirota M, Osawa K, Iwai T, Mitsudo K, Saruta J et al. The effects of a biomimetic hybrid meso- and nano-scale surface topography on blood and protein recruitment in a computational fluid dynamics implant model. Biomimetics (Basel). 2023;8(4).

Kitajima H, Hirota M, Osawa K, Iwai T, Saruta J, Mitsudo K et al. Optimization of blood and protein flow around superhydrophilic implant surfaces by promoting contact hemodynamics. J Prosthodont Res. 2022.

Sugita Y, Saruta J, Taniyama T, Kitajima H, Hirota M, Ikeda T et al. UV-pre-treated and protein-adsorbed titanium implants exhibit enhanced osteoconductivity. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(12).

Davies JE. In vitro modeling of the bone/implant interface. Anat Rec. 1996;245(2):426–45.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11(5):391–401.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kubo K, Att W, Yamada M, Ohmi K, Tsukimura N, Suzuki T, et al. Microtopography of titanium suppresses osteoblastic differentiation but enhances chondroblastic differentiation of rat femoral periosteum-derived cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;87(2):380–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kojima N, Ozawa S, Miyata Y, Hasegawa H, Tanaka Y, Ogawa T. High-throughput gene expression analysis in bone healing around titanium implants by DNA microarray. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(2):173–81.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ogawa T, Nishimura I. Genes differentially expressed in titanium implant healing. J Dent Res. 2006;85(6):566–70.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Komatsu K, Matsuura T, Suzumura T, Ogawa T. Genome-wide transcriptional responses of osteoblasts to different titanium surface topographies. Mater Today Bio. 2023;23:100852.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cooper LF. Biologic determinants of bone formation for osseointegration: clues for future clinical improvements. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(4):439–49.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA, Cooper LF. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In vivo studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13(1):17–29.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schneider GB, Zaharias R, Seabold D, Keller J, Stanford C. Differentiation of preosteoblasts is affected by implant surface microtopographies. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;69(3):462–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saruwatari L, Aita H, Butz F, Nakamura HK, Ouyang J, Yang Y, et al. Osteoblasts generate harder, stiffer, and more delamination-resistant mineralized tissue on titanium than on polystyrene, associated with distinct tissue micro- and ultrastructure. J Bone Min Res. 2005;20(11):2002–16.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;84(5):522–34.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: part 2–review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17(5):544–64.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jokstad A, Sanz M, Ogawa T, Bassi F, Levin L, Wennerberg A, et al. A systematic review of the role of implant design in the rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31:s43–99.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsukimura N, Ueno T, Iwasa F, Minamikawa H, Sugita Y, Ishizaki K, et al. Bone integration capability of alkali- and heat-treated nanobimorphic Ti-15Mo-5Zr-3Al. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(12):4267–77.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ueno T, Tsukimura N, Yamada M, Ogawa T. Enhanced bone-integration capability of alkali- and heat-treated nanopolymorphic titanium in micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy. Biomaterials. 2011;32(30):7297–308.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Uno M, Hayashi M, Ozawa R, Saruta J, Ishigami H, Ogawa T. Mechanical interlocking capacity of Titanium with respect to surface morphology and topographical parameters. J Dentistry Oral Biology. 2020;5(2):1163.

Google Scholar 

Uno M, Ozawa R, Hamajima K, Saruta J, Ishigami H, Ogawa T. Variation in osteoblast retention ability of titanium surfaces with different topographies. J Dentistry Oral Biol. 2020;5(3):1169.

Google Scholar 

Yamada M, Ueno T, Tsukimura N, Ikeda T, Nakagawa K, Hori N, et al. Bone integration capability of nanopolymorphic crystalline hydroxyapatite coated on titanium implants. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:859–73.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Yamada M, Ueno T, Minamikawa H, Ikeda T, Nakagawa K, Ogawa T. Early-stage osseointegration capability of a submicrofeatured titanium surface created by microroughening and anodic oxidation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(9):991–1001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cassinelli C, Morra M, Bruzzone G, Carpi A, Di Santi G, Giardino R, et al. Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 2. In vitro experiments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(1):46–52.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsukimura N, Kojima N, Kubo K, Att W, Takeuchi K, Kameyama Y, et al. The effect of superficial chemistry of titanium on osteoblastic function. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;84(1):108–16.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(1):63–74.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Att W, Ogawa T. Biological aging of implant surfaces and their restoration with ultraviolet light treatment: a novel understanding of osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(4):753–61.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang LC. Clinical applications of photofunctionalization on Dental Implant surfaces: a narrative review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(19).

Lee JH, Ogawa T. The biological aging of titanium implants. Implant Dent. 2012;21(5):415–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ogawa T. UV-photofunctionalization of titanium implants. Oral Craniofac Tissue Eng. 2012;2:151–8.

Google Scholar 

Almas K, Smith S, Kutkut A. What is the best micro and macro dental implant topography? Dent Clin North Am. 2019;63(3):447–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Damiati L, Eales MG, Nobbs AH, Su B, Tsimbouri PM, Salmeron-Sanchez M, et al. Impact of surface topography and coating on osteogenesis and bacterial attachment on titanium implants. J Tissue Eng. 2018;9:2041731418790694.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Coelho PG, Kang BS, Sul YT, Albrektsson T. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28(4):198–206.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jager M, Zilkens C, Zanger K, Krauspe R. Significance of nano- and microtopography for cell-surface interactions in orthopaedic implants. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2007;2007(8):69036.

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mendonca G, Mendonca DB, Aragao FJ, Cooper LF. Advancing dental implant surface technology–from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials. 2008;29(28):3822–35.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rompen E, Domken O, Degidi M, Pontes AE, Piattelli A. The effect of material characteristics, of