Antal A, Luber B, Brem AK, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2022;7:146–65.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Costa-Ribeiro A, Maux A, Bosford T, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation associated with gait training in Parkinson's disease: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(3):121–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu X, Liu H, Liu Z, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:746797.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Maudrich T, Ragert P, Perrey S, Kenville R. Single-session anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance sport-specific performance in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Stimul. 2022;15(6):1517–29.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yamaguchi T, Moriya K, Tanabe S, Kondo K, Otaka Y, Tanaka S. Transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with attention increases cortical excitability and improves motor learning in healthy volunteers. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17(1):1–13.

Article  Google Scholar 

Berryhill M, Martin D. Cognitive effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy and clinical populations: an overview. J ECT. 2018;34(3):e25–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lattari E, Oliveira BRR, Monteiro Júnior RS, et al. Acute effects of single dose transcranial direct current stimulation on muscle strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2018;13(12):e0209513.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lu P, Hanson NJ, Wen L, Guo F, Tian X. Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances muscle strength of non-dominant knee in healthy young males. Front Physiol. 2021;12:788719.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Machado S, Jansen P, Almeida V, Veldema J. Is tDCS an adjunct ergogenic resource for improving muscular strength and endurance performance? A systematic review. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1127.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hupfeld K, Ketcham C, Schneider H. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the supplementary motor area (SMA) influences performance on motor tasks. Exp Brain Res. 2017;235(3):851–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Corrêa FI, Ledur AC, Uehara L, de Andrade ML, Ferrari Corrêa JC, Fregni F. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with pelvic muscle training in women: randomized, controlled, double-blind, and clinical trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2024;43(4):967–76.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ramezani M, Ehsani F, Taghizadeh Delkhosh C, Masoudian N, Jaberzadeh S. Concurrent multi-session anodal trans-cranial direct current stimulation enhances pelvic floor muscle training effectiveness for female patients with multiple sclerosis suffering from urinary incontinence and pelvic floor dysfunction: a randomized clinical trial study. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(8):1771–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dumoulin C, Cacciari L, Hay-Smith E. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10(10):CD005654.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Woodley S, Lawrenson P, Boyle R, et al. Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;5(5):CD007471.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fitz FF, Missen Paladini L, de Azevedo Ferreira L, Gimenez MM, Tezelli Bortolini MA, Castro RA. Ability to contract the pelvic floor muscles and association with muscle function in incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(11):2337–44.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alouini S, Memic S, Couillandre A. Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence with or without biofeedback or electrostimulation in women: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(5):2789.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Morin A, Léonard G, Gougeon V, et al. Efficacy of transcranial direct-current stimulation in women with provoked vestibulodynia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(6):584.e1–11.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. Consort 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):1–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rich T, Menk JS, Rudser KD, et al. Determining electrode placement for transcranial direct current stimulation: a comparison of EEG- versus TMS-guided methods. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2017;48(6):367–75.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yani M, Wondolowski JH, Eckel SP, et al. Distributed representation of pelvic floor muscles in human motor cortex. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7213.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhao H, Qiao L, Fan D, et al. Modulation of brain activity with noninvasive Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): clinical applications and safety concerns. Front Psychol. 2017;8:685.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bertotto A, Schvartzman R, Uchôa S, Osório Wender MC. Effect of electromyographic biofeedback as an add-on to pelvic floor muscle exercises on neuromuscular outcomes and quality of life in postmenopausal women with stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(8):2142–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arouca M, Duarte TB, Malzone Lott DA, et al. Validation and cultural translation for Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(7):1097–106.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cruz LN, de Almeida Fleck MP, Oliveira MR, et al. Health-related quality of life in Brazil: normative data for the SF-36 in a general population sample in the south of the country. Cien Saude Colet. 2024;18:1911–21.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dall’Agno ML, Ferreira CF, Vargas Ferreira F, Pérez-López FR, Osório Wender MC. Validation of the six-item female sexual function index in middle-aged Brazilian women. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024;41:432–9.

Google Scholar 

Abdo CHN. Female sex ratio: a Brazilian questionnaire to evaluate woman’s sexual activity. Diagn Tratamento. 2009;14(2):89–90.

Google Scholar 

Laycock J, Brown J, Cusack C, et al. Pelvic floor reeducation for stress incontinence: comparing three methods. Br J Commun Nurs. 2001;6(5):230–7.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Fontenele M, Moreira MA, Ribeiro de Moura AC, Barros de Figueiredo V, Driusso P, Nascimento SL. Pelvic floor dysfunction distress is correlated with quality of life, but not with muscle function. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303(1):143–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gimenez M, Fitz FF, de Azevedo Ferreira L, Tezelli Bortolini MA, Silva Lordêlo PV, Castro RA. Pelvic floor muscle function differs between supine and standing positions in women with stress urinary incontinence: an experimental crossover study. J Physiother. 2022;68(1):51–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schneider N, Dagan M, Katz R, et al. Combining transcranial direct current stimulation with a motor-cognitive task: the impact on dual-task walking costs in older adults. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):1–13.

Article  Google Scholar