Porter, M. E. (2009). A strategy for health care reform—toward a value-based system. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(2), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0904131

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Greenhalgh, J. (2009). The applications of PROs in clinical practice: What are they, do they work, and why? Quality of Life Research, 18(1), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-008-9430-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rivera, S. C., Kyte, D. G., Aiyegbusi, O. L., Slade, A. L., McMullan, C., & Calvert, M. J. (2019). The impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials: A systematic review and critical analysis. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1), 156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1220-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Aiyegbusi, O. L., Isa, F., Kyte, D., Pankhurst, T., Kerecuk, L., Ferguson, J., & Calvert, M. (2020). Patient and clinician opinions of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of patients with rare diseases: A qualitative study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01438-5

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Damman, O. C., Verbiest, M. E. A., Vonk, S. I., Berendse, H. W., Bloem, B. R., de Bruijne, M. C., & Faber, M. J. (2019). Using PROMs during routine medical consultations: The perspectives of people with Parkinson’s disease and their health professionals. Health Expectations, 22(5), 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12899

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

van Muilekom, M. M., Teela, L., van Oers, H. A., van Goudoever, J. B., Grootenhuis, M. A., & Haverman, L. (2022). Patients’ and parents’ perspective on the implementation of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in pediatric clinical practice using the KLIK PROM portal. Quality of Life Research, 31(1), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02950-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feitz, R., van Kooij, Y. E., ter Stege, M. H. P., van der Oest, M. J. W., Souer, J. S., Wouters, R. M., & Hovius, S. E. R. (2021). Closing the loop: A 10-year experience with routine outcome measurements to improve treatment in hand surgery. EFORT Open Reviews, 6(6), 439–450. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210012

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Selles, R. W., Wouters, R. M., Poelstra, R., Van Der Oest, M. J. W., Porsius, J. T., Hovius, S. E. R., & Slijper, H. P. (2020). Routine health outcome measurement: Development, design, and implementation of the hand and wrist cohort. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 146(2), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007008

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Øvretveit, J., Zubkoff, L., Nelson, E. C., Frampton, S., Knudsen, J. L., & Zimlichman, E. (2017). Using patient-reported outcome measurement to improve patient care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 29(6), 874–879. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzx108

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bernstein, D. N., Calfee, R. P., Hammert, W. C., Rozental, T. D., Witkowski, M. L., & Porter, M. E. (2022). Value-based health care in hand surgery: Where are we & where do we go from here? The Journal of Hand Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.06.019

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ambika, M., Raghuraman, G., SaiRamesh, L., & Ayyasamy, A. (2020). Intelligence—based decision support system for diagnosing the incidence of hypertensive type. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 38(2), 1811–1825. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-190143

Article  Google Scholar 

Gleason, F., Feng, K., Herbey, I., Shorten, A., Chu, D. I., & Parmar, A. D. (2021). Patient, nurse, medical assistant, and surgeon perspectives inform the development of a decision support tool for inguinal hernia surgery: a qualitative analysis. The American Journal of Surgery, 222(2), 272–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.01.009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Langford, A. T., Hawley, S. T., Stableford, S., Studts, J. L., & Byrne, M. M. (2020). Development of a plain language decision support tool for cancer clinical trials: Blending health literacy, academic research, and minority patient perspectives. Journal of Cancer Education, 35(3), 454–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-1482-5

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Park, J., Kim, J.-W., Ryu, B., Heo, E., Jung, S. Y., & Yoo, S. (2019). Patient-level prediction of cardio-cerebrovascular events in hypertension using nationwide claims data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), e11757. https://doi.org/10.2196/11757

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

van Vliet, L. M., Harding, R., Bausewein, C., Payne, S., & Higginson, I. J. (2015). How should we manage information needs, family anxiety, depression, and breathlessness for those affected by advanced disease: Development of a Clinical Decision Support Tool using a Delphi design. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 263. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0449-6

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Reitan, I., Dahlin, L. B., & Rosberg, H.-E. (2019). Patient-reported quality of life and hand disability in elderly patients after a traumatic hand injury—a retrospective study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1215-9

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cohen, S. P., Vase, L., & Hooten, W. M. (2021). Chronic pain: An update on burden, best practices, and new advances. The Lancet, 397(10289), 2082–2097. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00393-7

Article  Google Scholar 

American Psychological Association. (2020). Journal Article Reporting Standards—Qualitative Design. Retrieved from www.apastyle.org/jarsAPAStyleJARS. Accessed 1 Apr 2022

de Ridder, W. A., van Kooij, Y. E., Slijper, H. P., Arends, G. R., de Roode, A., MacDermid, J. C., Vermeulen, G. M., Hovius, S. E. R., Selles, R. W., Wouters, R. M.; Hand-Wrist Study Group collaborators‡. (2023) Tailoring and evaluating treatment with the Patient-Specific Needs Evaluation: A Patient-Centered Approach. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011199

Wouters, R. M., De Ridder, W. A., Slijper, H. P., Vermeulen, G. M., Hovius, S. E. R., & Selles, R. W. (2023). The ultrashort mental health screening tool is a valid and reliable measure with added value to support decision-making. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 00, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000002718

Article  Google Scholar 

FESSH & EFSHT. (2023). FESSH program 2023. Presented at the FESSH-EFSHT 2023 Congress, Rimini. Retrieved from https://fessh2023.com/down/2023FESSH_program.pdf. Accessed 19 Jan 2024

Selles, R. W., Andrinopoulou, E.-R., Nijland, R. H., Van Der Vliet, R., Slaman, J., Van Wegen, E. E., & Kwakkel, G. (2021). Computerised patient-specific prediction of the recovery profile of upper limb capacity within stroke services: the next step. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 92(6), 574–581. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-324637

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim, H., Sefcik, J. S., & Bradway, C. (2017). Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: A systematic review. Research in Nursing and Health, 40(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21768

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(5), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119880234

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Article  Google Scholar 

Rapley, T. (2014). Sampling strategies in qualitative research. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 49–63). New York: SAGE Publications.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Sharma, G. (2017). Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. International Journal of Applied Research, 3(7), 749–752.

Google Scholar 

Pharos. (2022). Checklist herkennen laaggeletterdheid en beperkte gezondheidsvaardigheden. Pharos. Retrieved from https://www.pharos.nl/kennisbank/checklist-herkennen-laaggeletterdheid/. Accessed 11 Apr 2022

Staller, K. M. (2021). Big enough? Sampling in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Social Work, 20(4), 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250211024516

Article  Google Scholar 

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Hawker, G. A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T., & French, M. (2011). Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF). Arthritis Care & Research, 63(S11), S240–S252. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20543

Article  Google Scholar 

Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (n.d.). Hoe interpreteer je de SES-WOA-scores en hoe zijn deze bepaald? Hoe interpreteer je de SES-WOA-scores en hoe zijn deze bepaald? Retrieved June 1, 2023, from https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/faq/infoservice/hoe-interpreteer-je-de-ses-woa-scores-en-hoe-zijn-deze-bepaald-

Sundler, A. J., Lindberg, E., Nilsson, C., & Palmér, L. (2019). Qualitative thematic analysis based on descriptive phenomenology. Nursing Open, 6(3), 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.275

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Farmer, T., Robinson, K., Elliott, S. J., & Eyles, J. (2006). Developing and imple